2026-04-06

Maybe Central Casting is having to work overtime.

Plenty to get one's teeth into in this episode of the End of the World that We Once Knew.

What to believe? Your guess is as good as mine, but the outstanding truth appears to be that the Israeli-US axis of war is getting the worst of the "negotiations" with Iran, and Russia retains its position as possibly the most sane and consistent power on the planet.

Of course it could all be a vast Movie...   and perhaps the longest running production of our civilisation. It does seem to have that quality of real unrealism that good movies trade on, and certainly enough suspense to keep us on the edge of our seats.

Let us pray that no actors were harmed in its making...  (modest subscription required for full

2026-04-06

This is one where medical bureaucrats maybe really do place a tick in a box.

But is there a vaccine for it? Tricky this - if it's spread by ticks then will a face-mask suffice in crowded pubs (as public spaces will come to be called in the absence of the real thing)?

Will the bureaucrats all be guilty of spreading the disease without knowing it? Will further pandemic measures have to be invented to stop them?

And how could we survive the agonising wait for a vaccine, even if developed at warp speed, in our modern bureaucracy-ridden society? 

Indeed, how could a properly-regulated vaccine ever be developed without a veritable orgy of box-ticking?

Something will have to give.

Sit down before you read

2026-04-06

Mind the gap.

Mind the facts.

Mind the games.

Mind the illusions.

Mind games.

Mind the geopolitics.

Mind the money.

Mind the geopolitical illusions.

Mind the monetary illusions.

Mind over matter.

Mind over humanity.

Mind over sorcery.

However deep we go, are there more depths to plumb, more heights to scale?

2026-04-05

Professor Jiang provides his predictions. Based in China, so possibly influenced by the CCP?

"Human research presented by AI tools"

Oh, and he thinks that the war is maybe "designed to fail"...

"... it is a 30 - 35% probability and the consequences are dire... "

Actually this may be the more important video by far if you accept his conclusions...

(33 minutes)

Like /

2026-04-05

But what to do about it?

Well...   before we can think about that, we need to understand what is going on. Whether it's the job, the household, the "niceties" of legal life, or the kids on top of all of the above...

Martin Geddes has some words of wisdom that might help us, if only we could clear a calm space in our day to read and understand what he has to say.

Make of this what you will.

2026-04-04

The subjugation of Iran into the American / British Empire?

The destruction of Israel?

The destruction of American monetary and military hegemony?

The establishment of Greater Israel?

Given that we have mostly unreliable reports about what is actually going on in the Gulf, it's hard to know.

But help is at hand from a seasoned (and much reviled) veteran of British independent political thought who most certainly has a better grasp of such matters than I.

Make of this what you will.

2026-04-04

This follows on from Questions for the Medic Who Claims that You are a Suitable Case for Treatment.

"Once you see how the vocabulary operates, you will start noticing it everywhere — in your doctor’s office, in news reports, in the diagnosis you or someone you love may have already received"

Truly the spells under which we labour are all in the words used - words that presuppose notions that "they' want us to believe but of which we should be very wary. 

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not out to get you!

Four more topic-specific notions of which to be

2026-04-02

Following on from our recent article Could You Put Assumed Authority in its Rightful Place? which might help to deal with an unlawful legal challenge, there is scope for some companion article along the lines of "Could You Challenge your Medical Treatment Plan?". Most people (myself included prior to 2000) simply assume that "doctor knows best", but is that true?

It has always been problematic to me that it is illegal for anybody (except our NHS of course) to claim that they can cure cancer. How then is a cure to be found? Only by contributing to cancer research charities, who have been researching fruitlessly for my entire lifetime - perhaps if they had started looking elsewhere than in our wallets they might have had more success.

Then I developed urticaria and subsequently asthma. To be met with prescriptions for steroids /  inhalers that suppressed

2026-04-04

Covid, Covid, Wherefore Art Thou, Covid?

It's been a while since Covid stirred its stumps and got out of its sickbed once more to (they hope) scare the plebs silly again.

But there is hope! A New Variant! Cicada! Lord be Praised!

Will we have face masks, silly rules "for our safety", and kids sitting 2 metres apart from each other, again?

Will we have "non-essential" business closures, bankruptcies and Covid Warden busybodies "advising" us what we can and can't do, again?

And will the usual suspects in government and officialdom be caught out breaking their own arbitrary rules that they have inflicted on everybody else, again?

And will they be dishing urgent government contracts regardless of cost to their mates and chums who just happen to be on a fast-track procurement lane for things such as masks, tests, hospital

2026-04-03

It's not even a Secret Society, despite the video headline.

Nor is it Party Politics - you don't have to be member to be "influenced" by this society.

Given their openly declared policies of murdering those that they consider useless, one must ask how they got away with advocating such policies, policies that were clearly unchristian in an officially Christian country, and indeed illegal in both Christian and unchristian countries where incitement to murder is an offence (although technically they are not inciting anybody to do anything other than pass ill-advised laws that would have the effect of making what was already a crime legally acceptable - maybe that should be a crime too, although it's unclear whether MPs' activities in Parliament can be prosecuted in the Courts). 

But one does have to ask whether this Society itself is as deep as it goes, or whether there are other hidden hands that guide it to implement such policies on behalf of hitherto

2026-04-03

Well, Easter is upon us, so to end the week on a lighthearted speculation on what has been, might have been, and may yet be to come, we invoke the spirit of King Arthur to pique our curiosity and free us of our group-think by the noble arts of critical and "outside the box" thinking. Enjoy!

(12 minutes)

Like /Dislike this video here. 

2026-04-03

"He contended that the concentration of land ownership was the primary mechanism by which wealth extracted from productive labour accumulated in the hands of those who produced nothing"

Our readers who follow investment matters may recognise association with the 18½ year Real Estate Cycle which links the rise in real estate values with preceding investments in infrastructure. This link was recognised by 1879 when "Henry George published 'Progress and Poverty', an examination of why economic depressions occurred and why poverty persisted alongside industrial growth" 

For some reason the Education Curriculum taught in American schools prior to 1901 was changed to exclude not only this information... but how the problem might be avoided by a change to shift the burden of taxation to those who had actually accumulated the wealth to pay it.

No

2026-04-03

"Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

"Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

I feel that Martin Geddes might agree. 

"This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

2026-04-03

Barbara Boyd explains the Iran war from the viewpoint of Promethean Action.

It's certainly a multifaceted war, but which facet is the driver?

(13 minutes)

2026-04-02

Other renditions:

Not A Space Agency

Never A Straight Answer

No Authentic Space Adventures

I'm sure you can think of more...

Cyntha Koeter isn't impressed.

All of which begs more questions:   

Were the Russians in on it too?

Was Yuri Gagarin really the first man in space?

Did the Chinese really fly a robot or two to the moon?

...

2026-04-02

Here's a thought googling in from left field... 

Will Zionist Israel now jump ship to subvert the BRICS? Well, America isn't looking too good anymore as a means of global domination, so maybe the next century will be BRICS dominated. If Zionism (which is after all a global movement) isn't destroyed but still harbours dreams of Greater Israel and global domination, then BRICS is the obvious target.

And if the state of Israel by some mischance doesn't survive the Trump war, it wouldn't surprise me if it decided to rebuild "Zion" elsewhere, Ukraine maybe - I guess that might also satisfy Mr Putin's requirement for a "non-aligned" buffer state on his borders. I would be surprised if the Mossad hasn't been inserting its subversive operatives within the BRICS bureaucracy for some years now, or at least since the first Trump presidency.

And Epstein? He can

2026-04-02

William Keyte has made it his business to investigate our Constitution, which the Powers that Be have come close to denying exists, let alone publishing its existence and ensuring that at least our law officers understand and respect it. 

In fact, everybody should be educated in it and understand its imports, since it is the bedrock upon which our lawful legal system should be founded. Sadly, it doesn't always seem to be so.

Anyone might think that they want us to forget about it, and to think that Parliament is "sovereign" in this land... or maybe the EU, or the UN, or the WEF, the list goes on.

So who exactly is "sovereign"? Monarchy, Parliament, Judiciary, or the People?

William has set up a couple of websites about the foundations of our legal system.:

2026-04-02

The Bailiff Cometh (with apologies to the Gasman)
"Twas on the Monday morning that the bailiff came to call... "

Firstly, ask for their name , address, and whom they represent. You will need this.

1. Establish your ground - literally:
   "I am giving you verbal notice that I have withdrawn your implied right of access to this property, you are now a trespasser, please leave immediately"
   
   
2. "Before we proceed, I need to establish your jurisdiction. Are you acting as a public servant, or a private contractor for a corporation?" (or other legal entity)
   
   
3. "I require the original wet ink signature on that

2026-04-02

With "the Donald" seemingly morphed into Captain Belligerent and apparently intent on talking Bigger than his Boots (on the ground), Bill Bonner shares his thoughts on the decline of empires, from the Mongol to the American, and the Ottoman and British (and European) in between. 

Post-war Britain outsourced both its empire and its navy to the Zionist-USA, even going so far as to deliberately destroy its own capability (TSR2, Harrier) lest they should embarrass us by out-performing our "friends" (shouldn't that be "rebels"?) across the pond. Loss of control ensued, along with the UN, WEF, Bilderberg Group etc.

Now Bill Bonner shares his thoughts on how this could impact our future opportunities (NB: This is not financial advice!).

So will the next empire be Russian or Chinese? Whose turn is it? And who will be pulling their strings behind the

2026-04-01

Lei explains the latest political manoeuvrings in China. So what is Wen Jiabao up to?

(58 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.