2026-04-05

Professor Jiang provides his predictions. Based in China, so possibly influenced by the CCP?

It's a bit long at 33 minutes and his presentation style smacks of hectoring, but if he has confidence in his analysis then I guess that comes with the territory.

As nobody seems to have a good handle on where this is going, maybe he is worth a half-hour of our time.

"Human research presented by AI tools"

Oh, and he thinks that the war is maybe "designed to fail"...

"... it is a 30 - 35% probability and the consequences are dire... "

Actually this may be the more important video by far if you accept his conclusions...

(33 minutes)

Like /Dislike this video here. 

2026-04-03

"He contended that the concentration of land ownership was the primary mechanism by which wealth extracted from productive labour accumulated in the hands of those who produced nothing"

Our readers who follow investment matters may recognise association with the 18½ year Real Estate Cycle which links the rise in real estate values with preceding investments in infrastructure. This link was recognised by 1879 when "Henry George published 'Progress and Poverty', an examination of why economic depressions occurred and why poverty persisted alongside industrial growth" 

For some reason the Education Curriculum taught in American schools prior to 1901 was changed to exclude not only this information... but how the problem might be avoided by a change to shift the burden of taxation to those who had actually accumulated the wealth to pay it.

No

2026-04-03

"Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

"Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

I feel that Martin Geddes might agree. 

"This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

2026-04-03

Barbara Boyd explains the Iran war from the viewpoint of Promethean Action.

It's certainly a multifaceted war, but which facet is the driver?

(13 minutes)

2026-04-02

Other renditions:

Not A Space Agency

Never A Straight Answer

No Authentic Space Adventures

I'm sure you can think of more...

Cyntha Koeter isn't impressed.

All of which begs more questions:   

Were the Russians in on it too?

Was Yuri Gagarin really the first man in space?

Did the Chinese really fly a robot or two to the moon?

...

2026-04-02

Here's a thought googling in from left field... 

Will Zionist Israel now jump ship to subvert the BRICS? Well, America isn't looking too good anymore as a means of global domination, so maybe the next century will be BRICS dominated. If Zionism (which is after all a global movement) isn't destroyed but still harbours dreams of Greater Israel and global domination, then BRICS is the obvious target.

And if the state of Israel by some mischance doesn't survive the Trump war, it wouldn't surprise me if it decided to rebuild "Zion" elsewhere, Ukraine maybe - I guess that might also satisfy Mr Putin's requirement for a "non-aligned" buffer state on his borders. I would be surprised if the Mossad hasn't been inserting its subversive operatives within the BRICS bureaucracy for some years now, or at least since the first Trump presidency.

And Epstein? He can

2026-04-02

William Keyte has made it his business to investigate our Constitution, which the Powers that Be have come close to denying exists, let alone publishing its existence and ensuring that at least our law officers understand and respect it. 

In fact, everybody should be educated in it and understand its imports, since it is the bedrock upon which our lawful legal system should be founded. Sadly, it doesn't always seem to be so.

Anyone might think that they want us to forget about it, and to think that Parliament is "sovereign" in this land... or maybe the EU, or the UN, or the WEF, the list goes on.

So who exactly is "sovereign"? Monarchy, Parliament, Judiciary, or the People?

William has set up a couple of websites about the foundations of our legal system.:

2026-04-02

The Bailiff Cometh (with apologies to the Gasman)
"Twas on the Monday morning that the bailiff came to call... "

Firstly, ask for their name , address, and whom they represent. You will need this.

1. Establish your ground - literally:
   "I am giving you verbal notice that I have withdrawn your implied right of access to this property, you are now a trespasser, please leave immediately"
   
   
2. "Before we proceed, I need to establish your jurisdiction. Are you acting as a public servant, or a private contractor for a corporation?" (or other legal entity)
   
   
3. "I require the original wet ink signature on that

2026-04-02

With "the Donald" seemingly morphed into Captain Belligerent and apparently intent on talking Bigger than his Boots (on the ground), Bill Bonner shares his thoughts on the decline of empires, from the Mongol to the American, and the Ottoman and British (and European) in between. 

Post-war Britain outsourced both its empire and its navy to the Zionist-USA, even going so far as to deliberately destroy its own capability (TSR2, Harrier) lest they should embarrass us by out-performing our "friends" (shouldn't that be "rebels"?) across the pond. Loss of control ensued, along with the UN, WEF, Bilderberg Group etc.

Now Bill Bonner shares his thoughts on how this could impact our future opportunities (NB: This is not financial advice!).

So will the next empire be Russian or Chinese? Whose turn is it? And who will be pulling their strings behind the

2026-04-01

Lei explains the latest political manoeuvrings in China. So what is Wen Jiabao up to?

(58 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-04-01

And Jacob Nordangård has followed it all the way.

From the (apparently ananymous) author behind the "Lies are Unbekoming" Substack, if you want a very readable article outlining the story behind the WEF and Davos then this should be on your list.

So what is "Lies are Unbekoming" all about?

"... everything we were told about Covid and vaccines was wrong... what else have they lied to me about?

Four years and over a thousand articles later, the answer turns out to be: almost everything" 

And you can probably delete the "almost" bit without significantly affecting accuracy.

2026-04-01

Once upon a time, "banking" was all about allowing people to save their money (ie: the unspent wealth that they had created, the ability to buy the produce of others in the market) and lend it temporarily to those who need in effect to borrow money from their future production to buy the current produce of others. This was a genuine service that also allowed market sellers to sell their produce to those who did not yet have enough money to buy it. It thus avoided both deflation and inflation and was a genuine win-win situation.

Within limits of course. To keep the money supply in balance with the quantities of produce available in the market (and thus avoid inflation), only the money earned in the market (but not yet  spent to buy goods) should be loaned out.

These days though (and for many years past) bankers (supremely facilitated by electronics) have become expert at lending out fake money (ie: not representing any production available in the market and therefore inflationary in effect) and

2026-03-31

Plenty, one might think, given the growing scepticism about "pandemics", their "partnership" with the WEF, their funding from Big Pharma (eg: the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their GAVI vaccine interests) and the cessation of funding from the United States of America.

Plus the odd lawsuit that seem to be proliferating in the USA and the Netherlands to call the industry to account.

The Brownstone Institute suspects that all things considered, the time is now right for a significant level of reform to be agreed upon so that its role for the future can be more in line with its original objectives, rather than the consolidation of medical control under a centralised global body that accepts too much funding (and associated conflicts of interest) from corporate bodies (and their affiliated "charitable foundations") and exerts too much authority over national medical issues whilst