Censorship

2026-02-12

Nobody fully understands human history, let alone world history.

There are things that we can see that appear to be left over from previous times which remain tantalisingly beyond our understanding.

There are records on cuneiform tablets that tell of times in ancient Sumer (and elsewhere) which we lack the background knowledge to fully understand.

And current "official" history is clearly deficient in as much as it does not appear to satisfactorily explain the many evident anomalies.

So we are left to conjecture, to surmise, to try to fit together the information scraps that we have into some sort of a coherent narrative.

Clif High has a go at this with his "Dark Hypothesis" which we are advised NOT to read... and he makes some excellent points - just don't read them

2026-02-12

Guernsey? Why Guernsey? 

I don't know, but why not?

"America is among the sickest nations in the world, with 54% of children having a chronic condition"

"... the US Government has reduced the number of mandated childhood vaccine doses from 72 to 17, in line with much of Europe, where children are noticeably healthier"
(NB "Correlation does not prove causation"... but it certainly drops a big hint!)

"... despite Pfizer’s denials, it own data show that it knew perfectly well that vaccines are not confined to the injection site but spread around the body. This is what they were designed to do... "

"Then Pfizer pulled the ‘bait and switch’ scam... What we received (untested) was another product, based on the same design but manufactured in a very different way"

2026-02-11

It must be every spokesperson's fear, that the statements they make in contentious but complex high profile cases may come back to haunt them.

"... a monumental shift that disproves the Trump administration’s narrative that the action it has been taken on the Epstein Files has been made with the aim of providing full transparency"

So did Kash Patel lay himself open to humiliation by an incorrect answer to a question in Congress?

ZeroHedge reports on a day of unredacted viewing.

2026-02-11

Martin Geddes, fresh from his delta-sigma analysis, now turns his thoughts to the function that "attribution" plays in a Court of Law.

Or should play, but apparently doesn't always?

"The degradation itself is the game being played"

"... when you strip these failures down to their atomic elements, they repeatedly reduce to misattribution... "

"... In each case the object is not treated as a hypothesis to be proven, but as a premise to be relied upon..."

Now listen up, this is serious.

2026-02-11

If we care about the way that Justice (in its widest sense) is administered in this country, and maybe if we have an academic approach to such matters, then I guess we should.

If our academic abilities are dodgy but out approach logical, then we probably should.

If our logic is all over the place and we still have implicit faith in our authorities, then I would steer well clear.

That said, Martin Geddes has come up with an analytical approach (the "Delta-Sigma framework") to assess legalistic encounters with our authorities, that clarifies how our approach may be usefully constructed to illuminate the responses provided by authorities to our legitimate queries.

The previously unachievable (due to the huge investment of time and research required) being now achievable by anybody with a practical working knowledge of AI and the tenacity and logical mind necessary to work through the

2026-02-08

Is the Chinese leadership still in dispute?

Perhaps we westerners are too focused on what is visible and known rather than what is not directly evidenced - but absence of evidence is also evidence...

(Ignore the lack of video part-way through... )

(55 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-05

George Galloway reports in his own inimitable way.

"... this may sweep the British Monarchy away...Epstein had the run of Buckingham Palace... "

Hold on to your hats!

(2 hrs 10 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-04

"It is no longer possible to treat the Epstein case as a sexual scandal involving powerful individuals. What has now come to light... has pushed the debate to another level."

"How can one continue to accept the authority of institutions that shielded this level of horror?"

ZeroHedge opines on the effects of the Epstein revelations...

2026-02-04

Ivor Cummins has done a quick appraisal of the Epstein releases - apparently Epstein had his fingers in so many pies that one wonders if any pies remain unmolested?

Over to Ivor:

(22 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-02-03

Is the UK now a lawless State?

If so, when did it become a lawless State?

And what do we do about it?

Depending on your answer to the above first question, questions 2 and 3 now need some urgent attention.

It became clear to me when the State proposed to inflict a novel "warp speed" (and therefore with untested safety record) vaccine for a "novel" pandemic that had no statistically significant effect on the "excess deaths from all causes" statistic officially published, that something didn't add up. Such a course would be in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Codes if only on the grounds that there was no attempt to ensure that everyone who was "offered" the medication had been able to provide informed consent - on the grounds that they had not been informed. 

Indeed various levels of coercion were attempted in the UK with varying degrees of success. The

2026-01-29

The difference between the Trump mindset and the previous prevailing political mindset may be quite simple - Trump doesn't wrap his intentions in pseudo-speak, he tells them like they are.

At least sometimes, with the exception of when he just wants to confuse his adversaries, whoever they may at the time be (work with me here - he's one of a kind after all).

For a politician, speaking the blunt but unpopular truth is big-time heresy. It also might be the first step toward moving politicians from the group responsible for the joke "How do you know when a politician is lying? - When you see his lips move" to a group in which we might actually place some credence in their promises (but don't hold your breath).

At least Mark Carney is apparently joining him (possibly temporarily) in speaking

2026-01-28

"This crisis is far from over... "

(55 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-01-24

Cyntha Koeter of Fall of the Cabal has delved deep into the history, and comes up with a story that sheds some light into a dark corner.

I have not verified the details, but I would trust Cyntha in preference to many others - although who is to say that her brand has not been taken over by the dark forces?

2026-01-23

Did a reverse coup just happen in Beijing?!

Those of our readers who have been following these reports will be aware that Xi Jinping has been elbowed away from the leadership by the expedient of removing his supporters from positions of power. Is Xi JP getting his retribution in now?

Lei brings us up to date with the latest "rumours"...  make of them what you will.

(56 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-01-18

Mark Playne has been interrogating his AI (ChatGPT? He doesn't specify) again. 

This time on the basis of the US, UK and global statistics available that indicate rates of myocarditis occurrence in large (and some small but not statistically significant) populations over pre and post pandemic years.

It's a deep dive and he's clearly picking his questions with care - but how else could this be done? AI is a logical inference machine, not (yet?) a fount of critical thinking. It cannot decide the questions, only the responses.

Proof positive it is not, but it is a red flag indicating the need for further investigation. MHRA JCVI UKHSA are you listening?

See what you think...

...

2026-01-17

How many people live in China? 

Real, not fake, people?

After years of the one-child policy?

After the (reported) horrors of Covid? 

Do the math...

(63 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-01-17

Well, some of us are undoubtedly ahead on this topic, but the majority are probably not.

After all, the Law of the land is a complex topic, made ever more complex every passing year to the point where the legal beagles can run rings around the common person simply by obfuscation, delay, and weaponising of administration to the point where one lifetime is not enough to read up on everything that we would need to know to win a case in court (AI to the rescue?).

The same applies to most MPs, who have to cope with the additional demands from their political party in order to (a) be selected as a candidate and (b) keep the party whip. And maybe also illegal demands to keep them subservient to secret agendas from unelected international bodies or even criminal syndicates.

Ok, most people probably don't accept the latter, but it doesn't matter - Parliament is at best a closed shop that places

2026-01-15

(34 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-01-14

His guest is author Guy Anderson, whose quest to unravel the mystery of the disappearance of one of the largest empires on earth has led him to write the book.

(38 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-01-13

Once again on the subject of AI, and what differentiates AI from humanity, Martin Geddes guides us through the intricacies of humanity's use of artificial intelligence.

This may sound arcane, but it's crucial to understand its limits and to recognise when those limits are overstepped, otherwise we risk AI becoming a control mechanism for the unsuspecting - merely another branch of the brainwashing mass media. There are plenty who would want that.

"... when conscience becomes unsayable, society loses its most important safeguard"

What AI must not decide.