Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2024-05-21

Roland Angle, board Chairman of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, talks about why the destruction of the twin towers has lost none of its contentious attributes in the nearly 23 years since it happened in 2001.

On the one hand we have the official government enquiry which attributed the collapse of the three World Trade Centre buildings (WTC1 WTC2 WTC7) to fire, and on the other hand we have the professional qualified engineers that were (and are still) adamant that fire alone could not possibly account for the observed collapses - and indeed that video evidence strongly suggests that they fell into their own footprint as a result of controlled demolition.

We have covered the events of 9/11 and the subsequent controversies previously, but the official narrative remains the official narrative, and this review with Roland Angle may help introduce  those who may not yet be familiar to the story.

" ... it was an attack on the World Trade Centre to draw us into war"

" ... when the reports came out, it's 13,500 pages on the twin towers ... the report didn't actually give an analysis of why the buildings collapsed ... the part that they were tasked to do they actually did not answer "

(69 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.