2025-05-23

Is A I all it's cracked up to be?

Certainly Martin Geddes believes it to be very useful in making sense of legal issues, where exhaustive searches of legal precedent (or even merely of the Statute Book!) are beyond the reach of most.

And yet... on the other side, there are those who believe that an AI that eliminates the need for people to work in their traditional employment may not be in the interests of the population at large.

The Luddites thought similarly when factories introduced automation to handle jobs previously undertaken by humans, but if they had had their way, modern man would look and live much like pre-automation man and thelabour-saving technology that today

2025-05-19

Martin Geddes (with a little help from AI) relates his lawful activities to uncover lawless Courts to the ever evolving nature of warfare: warfare is conducted by lawfare before ever it comes to force of arms.

"We are now in an era of metawarfare, where the battlefield is not fixed, but disputed—because the war is about what the war is"

"Victory belongs to whoever defines the conflict"

"... To 'win' at lawfare is... to compel the opposition to cease their opposition to truth"

At one level this is obvious, and is evidenced by the oath of witnesses:

"I swear (/ affirm etc) to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"  

Whither the World Post 2024?

2025-05-17

"The Lord is not whispering any more... "

In a startling address, His Holyness addresses the need to awake, and points up 2025 as the year of the Return of the Lord, the greatest moment in history.

"... the call to awaken is not gentle... "

"This is the hour to wake up"

Yes, it's a bit apocalyptic, but that makes a refreshing change from the traditional bland pronouncements of clergy of many denominations who tend to be either ahead of or behind the curve of unfolding events.

"Repentance is not just for the world, it is for the church, it is for the pastors who have grown silent... the call is not for someone else, it is for you, it is for me... "

It's not a bad speech, even if it does have the hallmarks of being delivered by an AI. In consequence some may feel that it lacks

2025-05-16

So what exactly is Trump up to in Arabia?

They seem to be surprisingly Trumpish toward him if you ask me.

And I don't think it's simply because the size of his ego impresses them...

Investor's Daily (PKA "Fortune and Freedom" - this is not financial advice!) has a suggestion that perhaps makes much more sense...

2025-05-15

Martin Geddes' quest to get to the bottom of his strange "prosecution" for parking his van in darkest Cumbria has elicited a remarkable response from the person in charge of "Legal and Professional Services, Central Legal Operations", at "HM Courts and Tribunal Service".

You just have to read this, otherwise you wouldn't believe that a senior Barrister in high position would be capable of such a legally inadequate reply.

But in mitigation, perhaps the said respondent hasn't caught up with the AI revolution yet? I suspect that running the FOIA through an appropriate AI would have prompted a rather different response...

2025-05-12

The Family courts in current form are a relatively recent innovation. Their main claim to fame appears to be that they can deny that age-old legal maxim that "justice must be seen to be done" (in order save those involved in their proceedings from embarrassment) by excluding members of the public and/or by imposing reporting restrictions on journalists.

In addition to his other clashes with officialdom, Martin Geddes has now become involved in Family Court cases, this time in the US.

"The problem is systemic and ideological."

He is not impressed - nor is his ChatGPT...

2025-05-09

Martin Geddes is as indefatigable as anyone, but is finding it absurdly difficult to answer this question.

In reality, t's not a question you can expect a Court to answer - they are bound to say "of course it does" and "we are justice", even if (God forbid) they are all crooks masquerading as a Court.

So he has been researching the possible avenues by which he might get a valid answer from the "justice system".

"... the justice system has no incentive to make the truth discoverable. Complexity is its shield. Obscurity is its fortress"

Has he succeeded?

"My bundle for the High Court is nearly complete — over 150 pages in total"

Well, it's evidently complicated...   even with

2025-05-08

Martin Geddes offers his AI's take on 5th generation warfare (all very peculiar).

We are well into Orwellian territory now. It is the war against mind-control, the war against unthinking compliance, against habitual deference to those who assert authority, and against the worldview within which we grew up (and into which we were indoctrinated).

Everyone is on this battlefield whether or not we realise it. 

Only those of us prepared to think the unthinkable will survive it.

Everything we have been told is up for challenge and rethinking, individual by individual.

Nobody can rethink everything, but understanding the necessity, and making a start, will likely be enough.

Make of it what you will

2025-05-07

Fascism is one of those words which student protesters hurl at protestees (is there such a word? I don't see why not) with whom they imagine that they disagree. And it is true that words can morph through constant misuse to mean something quite different to their original purpose, although Humpty Dumpty might not agree.

One might in passing expect students to be better informed, but these days, rightly or wrongly, we don't.

"Fascism" as a word was used back in the day by Mussolini, "Il Duce", and has its etymological root in the

2025-05-02

What has the old BBC Micro got to do with Martin Geddes' legal work?

It's all down to achieving the correct mindset, one that enables logical thought and analysis regardless of human emotion, location, time or space.

Of course no mindset can last for ever - the inner human gets hungry, the lights eventually go out, and the parking lot beckons, but while it lasts it is all-consuming attention to detail.

But will the results ever see the light of a genuine court?

2025-04-25

Martin Geddes isn't happy to solve the immediate problem, he wants to delve deeper to identify and resolve the underlying cause(s) so that the problem or family of problems will not happen again (or if it does it will fail safely - you can tell he cut his teeth in IT!).

That in principle is simple enough in the context of IT, although IT is now infamous for being constructed of many layers of abstraction, with appropriate software to manage the operation of each layer.

When I started in IT it was possible to understand almost every layer and how it worked... but nowadays nobody understands more than a few - those that are of special significance for the individual. The rest can wait until we are forced to grapple with an unfamiliar error message!

Real-world systems are also multi-layered, even a trip to the shops may involve operating the garage, getting the car out, navigating and driving and operating the car's controls (three or more quite distinct

2025-04-23

Martin Geddes has been waging his one man legal crusade to expose and ultimately invalidate the legal mechanisms that are used to bewilder the unprepared, who are "taken to court" by a due-process-free system (= "taken to the cleaners").

"... no process has authority unless it first proves its standing in truth. This is the difference between tyranny and order..."

"I have asked the AI engine to reverse engineer the implied doctrine I am working with, so that others can see how I am working, and adapt and improve it"

Not to mention using it for themselves.

"This elevates the use of AI above mere productivity... it becomes a high-level thinking partner"

So if you feel like taking on a challenge...

2025-04-22

I've never heard of Perplexity.ai, but it sounds like it might be appropriately named.

Patrick Wood (of Technocracy News) explains what he asked it for and what he got.

" ... they don't want my voice heard anywhere on the internet ... "

Maybe there's something in this AI lark after all...

2025-04-21

First we reported that Martin Geddes has had some success in training his AI to be more responsive to matters spiritual - and now he's not the only one.

This time it's Mark Playne, who has persuaded his AI to come clean about the COVID scamdemic - so pin back your ears and hear what Mark has to say to Richard Vobes on this topic.

Then read his bookon how he did it, it's very revealing!

(49 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-04-19

We touched on this topic recently, but it's probably worth another airing to expand upon some of the practical aspects of "training" your AI in matters doctrinal.

Apparently it can be done, at least up to a point.

"The outputs I am getting from AI are noticeably deeper and more helpful than other people, as I have trained it in foundational doctrine. My AI is now skeptical of official narratives and control structures"

Heck, if Martin can do it, why can't we all?!

Well, perhaps we can.

Especially as we can all access his training materials.

2025-04-17

What does the future hold for man in an AI world?

Will we all be "enhanced" through injected nanobot interfaces to a global AI-powered controller, becoming little more than an obedient node on the Internet of Things?

Or will we leverage our human consciousness to out-think and out-compete AI to the point that we don't need it?

Or could we harness AI to do what it does best - crunching the data and leaving no logical avenue unexplored - whilst we learn how to train it, how to use it to construct the output that we want in a more effective and efficient manner?

Man and AI in perfect symbiosis?

It helps to ask the right question!

Martin Geddes reviews.

2025-04-07

We have featured a number of articles on the topic of AI, notably as used by Martin Geddes to formulate his arguments more comprehensively than he would have been able to do unaided in the same time-frame.

Today we have another contribution to the topic, this time from Cyntha of FallCabal fame, whose approach is from a different perspective. 

Can both be right?

As always, it depends...  

If we recognise the limitations of AI, and use it accordingly for its analysis and presentation skills, then perhaps it can excel, yet if we expect it to exercise human judgement, we may be disappointed. It isn't a living breathing being with hard-fought life experience to match.

We "know"

2025-04-03

Martin Geddes strikes again, this time looking at the aspects of judicial "quality control" within the Family Courts system in the US.

With a twist - AI does the analysis, thus minimising the effect of any pre-existing perceptions on his part.

The result...  well, best read for yourself.

I have little doubt that a similar result would ensue from a UK analysis. Clearly this needs to be urgently progressed.

2025-04-02

UK Column Talks with Catherine Austin Fitts about the onward march towards the digital panopticon, seemingly being supported by the Trump regime in the USA.

There's a lot of topics covered here, and some timely reminders that Trump's installation as President isn't necessarily going to halt stuff in its tracks.

Still, despite the Administration's frantic activity, it's still early days...

(43 minutes)