Health

2026-01-15

Anybody who has been following the possibility of a vaccine or vaccines in combination causing autism will be aware that the CDC has historically always said that "vaccines do not cause autism".

That line of reassurance began to fall apart when they had to admit that they had no clinical study that confirmed that position - they only had an assumption that as the question had never been properly examined, there was no causal effect since none had been proven by a clinical study (which would not be in the obvious interests of the vaccine manufacturers to undertake).

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

Still, at least the CDC has now adjusted its advice to reflect the more nuanced thinking.

Maybe one day they will get around to mounting a proper study, although who might actually

2026-01-10

It seems to have all the ingredients - billionaire owners, "compensation" for victims who amongst other conditions "promise not to sue", bankruptcy settlement, relaunch of company under new branding and "new management"...  why am I not reassured?

"... all these drugs that (at best) blur the line between medical and recreational use, that turn doctors (willingly or not) into drug dealers and patients (willingly or not) into addicts. And the fact the ADHD drugs continue to be given out like candy for kids year after year is a national disgrace"

Well, this is in America, but where America goes, the UK frequently follows...

What do you think?

2026-01-04

OK, as a mere male I know my place, which is that I know absolutely nothing about this topic - but it is written by a woman (as far as one can tell these days!), and it strikes me as pretty damned important stuff that every already or soon-to-be adolescent youngster of the fair sex absolutely should know (but these days won't be told).

(BTW Is it really true that male gynaecologists outnumber the ladies (count them)? How does it make any sense at all that maybe up to half of the available gynaecologists lack lived experience to relate to?) 

So,straight on with the article.  And don't be put off by the title - it's not merely about

2025-12-18

Many of us now realise that Big Corporate of all kinds pharmaceutical agricultural petrochemical etc interests work via their "non-profits" and "charitable foundations" to advance the cause of their respective industries, often in collaboration with government "regulators" and "think tanks" and any other interested "independent" NGOs including the United Nations and its diaspora of largely unaccountable "doers of good" like the WEF.

The question that Interest of Justice is now asking is the pertinent one:-

Can this false cornucopia of self-serving corporate-governmental (BTW: is that not the original definition of fascism according to Benito Mussolini?) bodies ever be made to work for the interests of the people, and if so, how?

To make things more

2025-12-15

The Brownstone Institute wades in where lesser mortals fear to tread - on the toes of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

We have mentioned before the view that Big Pharma may not always have been scrupulously honest with us.

Now the Brownstone Institute (surely a name that simply exudes probity integrity and moral rectitude?) weighs in with their views on vaccinology, and finds it, well, less than persuasive.

As always, it falls to us to be the judge of such matters.

2025-12-15

Covid for me was the definitive eye-opener.

What purpose did the tests serve? To identify a "case", or to persuade you that you were (OMG!) infected with consequences too awful to contemplate?

Search as I might, I could not find any published information about the accuracy of the test. Cue "What if it isn't very accurate?"... "What if it's actually a psy-op and will give you false positives galore - who's to know?"

"They wouldn't do that... would they?"

So I looked at the stats - official stats - showing that the deaths were largely among the old with comorbidities, at around their expected lifespan...  and deaths overall were staying within normal statistical expectation...   until 2021 broke alongside the quaxxine campaigns.

"Yes, they do seem to be doing that".

And now for my personal anecdote that proves nothing

2025-12-02

As somebody who faced my mid-life health crisis, and recovered (eventually) through my own efforts and appropriate dietary updates,I am happy to bang the drum for Clive de Carle, here interviewed by Neil Oliver. If you have been grappling with an obstinate condition that has defied conventional treatment, then listen up.

And if you are young and lucky enough to still be in working order and carefree of diet, watch it anyway, because we are all aging (for now) and forewarned is forearmed...

... and stand by for a novel method of motivating your doctor!

(64 minutes)

Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

2025-11-26

Happily this mRNA product was never released to the public as the clinical trial failed on its own terms. The trial results are however alarming.

"In a statement on Halloween 2023, the company promised to release the results by the end of 2023¹. It did not.

Instead, in May 2025, long after its self-imposed deadline, Pfizer quietly updated the 'study results' page for the trial on the clinicaltrials.gov Website with trial’s results."

Alex Berenson

2025-11-26

The NHS is showing its "progressive" tendencies.

Despite the many good people still trying to make this unstable top-heavy unaccountable progressivistic leviathan work for our benefit, its leadership is myopic, management is treated as a specialism in its own right and thus populated by expert managers, and the stench of rank stupidity has become intolerable.

Other than that the NHS is wonderful of course and we wouldn't have it any other way...

2025-11-24

And deservedly so.

No, it was not an "in depth" inquiry, which would have asked the deep questions such as "Why were Prof Ferguson's Covid expected deaths modelling so vastly inflated"? 

Was the supposition that the PCR tests worked infallibly true - to what extent was it not true? All tests produce "false positives" and "false negatives" - was this novel test for a novel virus actually accurate - or was the testing of the (largely asymptomatic) general population actually a good exercise to determine the real rate of "false positives"?

If a mere IT retiree such as myself could think to ask such simple but revealing questions, what does that say about the good Baroness

2025-11-22

Monsanto is infamous for the herbicide Glyphosate, which is widely used for the wheat harvest.

Monsanto eventually sold the rights to Glyphosate to Bayer, who was also subsequently sued.

"Dogs have the highest rate of cancer rate of any mammals... "

Glyphosate was withdrawn from retail sale in the UK a while ago, but is still available for commercial sale to farmers, who use it (but not exclusively) on grain crops (wheat, oats, barley etc).

"Wisner outlines Monsanto’s malice and blatant disregard for human safety as demonstrated in their own documents and even in their statements and behavior during the trial"

Bread cake pasta and pastry lovers take note!

It's also almost impossible these

2025-11-21

The CDC admits:

‘No Evidence’ to Support Claim that Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism.

A first halting step (through gritted teeth?!) toward the truth?

Whilst that statement doesn't imply that some vaccines do or may cause autism, it does open the door to investigating whether any of the poisons that they commonly include in a vaccine may well potentially cause autism.

Who will take up this hot potato?

If you are a parent, or anyone else considering vaccination, you now have slightly more grounded information to work with.

2025-11-18

Brownstone Institute (Maryanne Demasi) reports on that other strategy alleged by some to wreak havoc with out health:- statins.

Everybody these days (at least above a certain age) it seems is "advised" to take statins as a preventative "because cholesterol" (and maybe because it's more dosh into the pockets of Big Pharma).

This is controversial, as cholesterol is a somewhat oversimplified term with various versions and shades of effects. It's natural, and we would die without it.

My own rule now is that my body simply cannot be unwell due to a lack of pharmaceutical products, which have only been invented in the blink of the last 100 years or so.

We know such products are not

2025-10-29

This is yet another hardy perennial which hasn't been investigated for ever, but when such an investigation does slip through, the scent of whitewash liberally applied tends toward the hazardous.

We were reporting on this back in 2020 but the original video has somehow been removed.

Still, this prior article gives the official FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's then views on the need for a health and safety approach to the 5G roll-out.

As there has seemingly been no official progress that hasn't been accused of whitewash, it's obviously time to review the situation. The WHO has

2025-10-12

Released today, a 2½ hr video for those who like their boredom monotone.

Dr Joseph Sansone comments and links.

I won't repeat all the arguments here, it's become too tedious, but you can watch the video below, and there is plenty more background at Interest of Justice, and on our own Covid menu page.

(2 hrs 31 mins)

2025-10-12

Feeling stressed out? Bad Day histrionics? Can't cope?

Well, if you're like me (you do have two arms, two legs, a head with two eyes, two ears, one nose etc?) then maybe this is for you.

Listening to the right music can work wonders with your mood, putting you up for dancing like a Dervish, waltzing around the ballroom, working up a brisk concentration, or just plain letting go for a blessed interlude where thoughts quieten and (if you want) relaxation rules.

It needn't stop you working (I'm listening as I write this) but it does calm and soothe to excellent effect. Try it when you go to bed and you'll likely wake up as relaxed as you have never been (and your ailments may have measurably improved to boot!).

...

2025-10-09

Alert readers may notice the additional quote in our site masthead!

Clif High is an extraordinary polymath of vast learning and exceptional life experience. Following his teachings is also an exceptional experience, by which perhaps many may be unpersuaded, but which I find logically compelling as his notions fit in well with my intuitive (yet not so far very practical!) understanding of how this universe works.

The critical question (which perhaps Science as we know it gets backwards) is:

"Which acts as foundation for the other: consciousness or 3-dimensional matter?"

You may agree I think that the question is fundamental!

If consciousness is the foundation of matter, then it follows that if we wish to understand matter then we must first understand consciousness, whereas if somehow consciousness arises from matter then we must first understand the material

2025-10-09

Did Wilhelm Reich photograph living viruses in the 1930s?

Regular readers will be familiar with our (and Mike Yeadon's) suggestion that modern-day viruses are a hoax put about by the industry in order to justify injecting the healthy with their products - the healthy being a much larger population than the already sick, and thus present the potential for bigger profits by several orders of magnitude!

If Wilhelm was photographing live viruses in vivo, (and destroying them with pin-point accuracy by bio resonance!) doesn't that prove us wrong?

Unlikely for several reasons - but primarily that Big Pharma went to some trouble to ensure that his discoveries were never to be developed, because they would have made the pharmaceutical industry obsolete. Big Pharma's version of virology isn't based on Wilhelm Reich's research, so if his story is correct, their's is BS.

2025-09-27

Is there more to learn from the Covid Experience, or have we reached the bottom of the sack of horrors already / at last / so soon?

We have featured articles on the incoming population implosion already, but it's pertinent to ask whether the C jabs have contributed to this sudden reversal of human birth rates - despite the misgivings of those who may have vested time and money in pharmaceutical interests.

If we don't ask, we don't find out. A cheery but unsupported assurance that the quaxxines couldn't possibly be to blame doesn't cut the mustard any more (if it ever did - remember Thalidomide -  as it seems nobody else cares to).

So could an injection based on novel technology and rushed to market "at warp speed", and then only given approval for emergency use, possibly cause adverse effects on