EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
  • Now Official - Almost Any Government Agency Can break the Law with Impunity


    Back in December we reported that the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill 2019/21 was wending its way through Parliament.


    Today we report that it has received the Royal Assent and is now law.

    View it here, download it here.


    "An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of covert human intelligence sources.
    [1st March 2021]"

    An authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source does not authorise any criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of a covert human intelligence source (but see section 29B for provision for the authorisation of such conduct)

    "29B Covert human intelligence sources: criminal conduct authorisations


  • Ben Habib Launches Lawfare over the NI Protocol


    Ben Habib explains what he is up to - he is taking Boris to task for the Northern Ireland protocol that is currently dividing the Union.

    Today we are writing to the Prime Minister. This government is driving a coach & horses through the Act of Union. We have no option but to take legal action

    Whilst it's good to see initiatives like this that take the preservation of the Union very seriously, surely the point is that Parliament should be taking the lead here?

    The very fact that politicians are now resorting to legal action speaks volumes about the fiction that Parliament is composed of those who represent the views of the people.


    Like / Dislike this video here.

  • The Good Law Project Wins PPE Procurement Case against Government


    The BBC reports:-

    "Matt Hancock acted unlawfully when his department did not reveal details of contracts it had signed during the Covid pandemic, a court has ruled"

    When the Covid pandemic struck the government allegedly threw all its normal procurement processes out of the window as it seemingly fell over itself to place orders for PPE.

    Many questioned the rationale for placing such orders with suppliers who appeared to be manifestly unsuitable under all normal sourcing criteria, but in any event the government was still under a legal obligation to publish details of its procurements within 30 days after the event.

    It appears that this obligation was not fulfilled.

    The Guardian has a slightly fuller report.

    The BMJ also has an excellent report.

    The Crowdfunder site for this case is here, but has not at time of writing been updated with this

  • Dr Fuellmich Serves Cease and Desist Papers on Professor Christian Drosten


    Professor Drosten was the co-author of the Corman-Drosten paper which first described the RT-PCR test protocol for the SARS-Cov-2 virus. That protocol was quickly adopted by the WHO as their recommended test.

    That original paper was critically reviewed in November 2020.

    It pretty much goes without saying that if the test is flawed then so is the whole pandemic-lockdown strategy and quite possibly the pandemic itself.

    Dr Fuelmich has now taken the next logical step - to demand that Professor Drosten recompenses his client for the damage caused to his business

    Never mind this particular business - Governments may fall if this case succeeds.

    Dr Fuellmich is a German lawyer who also practices in California, where class-action lawsuits are possible.

    Read our recent report on his activities.

    In his letter to Professor Drosten he examines five fallacies that he identifies as contributing to the

  • Class Action Covid Lawsuit in the USA?


    Dr Reiner Fuellmich is a German lawyer who also practices in California.

    He is particularly concerned about the relevance of the PCR test when used as a means of assessing cases in the general population, and for the economic and personal damage caused by lock-downs.

    Read about his project (note: this is a German page translated by Google Translate - you may notice a few oddities :) .

    Also, watch this video:


    Like / Dislike this video here.

    Worth keeping an eye on - a successful lawsuit in the USA would have plenty of repercussions elsewhere.


    See our previous article.

  • Environmental Health Trust et al v. Federal Communications Commission


    The EHT court case against the FCC - first report from the hearing in Washington DC.

    The EHT has published an article including two video reports, one assessing the way that the hearing went, the other an audio recording from the hearing itself.

    I found that latter quite revealing - to a laymen such as myself it seems extraordinary that the FCC (which one might have expected to have expertise in telecomms technology) should have relied on the FDA (Federal Food and Drug Administration) to assess the safety of electronic communications radiations. What were they thinking of?

    Anyway, enough of my legally unqualified opinions.

    The case continues, but Judge Robert L. Wilkins is reported to have stated to the FCC "I am inclined to rule against you".

    Read about the case here.

    Landmark Case Against the FCC - Appeal Hearing


    This case reaches the appeals court shortly, and the EHT provides links to all the evidence and to the livestream on Monday 25 January 9:30am EST (14:30 GMT).

    Read all about the Monday hearing.

    Read the original article.

    Read the first report on the appeal.

  • Anna Von Reitz: Plain Speaking for Patriotic Americans (Several Posts)


    Land of the free, home of the brave- the United States of America - or should that be THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

    Anna Von Reitz has spent many years disentangling the legal status of the various versions of the USA, and what a story she tells!

    "Everything is upside down and backward.  The schools don't educate, the doctors don't heal, the lawyers don't defend, and no matter how much people pay in "taxes" it is never enough, and it never manages to fill the potholes"

    I've no idea whether she is right or wrong, but I have the suspicion that she is at least on the right tracks in many places - some things were made to come under the heading "You couldn't make it up".

    Intriguing question - is "the Donald" about to do some disentangling for real?

    If Trump is going to do something at the "last minute" to upend the biggest apple-cart the world has ever seen, and if there is truth in Anna's investigations, then will these two likely come together in perfect.synchronicity?

  • The Chinese Communist Party’s "Global Lockdown Fraud"


    News today of an international initiative to request the FBI to investigate the CCP's alleged Covid fraud.

    Now if Biden is eventually inaugurated then this will go straight into the waste bin, and if Trump succeeds then hopefully it hardly needs sending - but - this is an extended document that provides a whole host of relevant information that any lock-down sceptic should be aware of.

    "In the course of our work, we have identified issues of a potentially criminal nature and believe this investigation necessary to ensure the interests of the public have been properly represented by those promoting certain pandemic policies"

    "This letter is meant to call the attention of federal authorities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States (the “Nations”) to multiple points of evidence about the origin and historical precedent of lockdowns; . . ."

    "Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire “science” of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion . . ."

    Read the whole thing on-line (and download if needed). Or use your browser to save the page to your local file system.


  • "Say NO to a Police State"


    Nigel Farage shares some video footage that should give us all pause for reflection about the direction in which our government is taking us.

    "I'm beginning to think that the battle to get back our individual liberty could be an even bigger battle than the battle to get us out of the European Union"


    Like / Dislike this video here.

    Nigel towards the end draws attention to the "covert intelligence bill" currently wending its way quietly through Parliament.

    i don't remember this Bill featuring in any reports from the main-stream media but I may be mistaken.

    We already reported on this in December, but it's good to see Nigel catching up.

  • PCR Claims - The Costs of Lockdown


    "Our mission statement is simple:
    To bring LEGAL JUSTICE to UK citizens for the devastating harm caused by lockdowns to families and businesses"

    I am grateful to Lockdown Sceptics for this link to the PCR Claims site, which is working to establish the legal claims situation, where people and businesses that have incurred damage to their interests due to the unprecedented public restrictions introduced in response to the "pandemic" can submit their evidence of loss to their legal team.

    I'm not sure how that works exactly but it looks well worth following up. It's nigh-on impossible to mount a court case against the government as an individual, but as a group - it could be viable. This is an opportunity for "we the people" to hold the government to account.

    Lead Counsel Jo Rogers:

    ". . . when it becomes known globally, when it becomes an accepted principle (which I believe it is) that the PCR test is not fit for purpose, then the whole house of cards is going to fall down"

    ". . . I really want those individuals to have an option, and what we are aiming to do here is gather evidence, get the evidence now, because there's no point in two years time looking back and thinking "Oh, if only

  • BREXIT - Lawyers for Britain Give their Reaction


    Well, tonight we have lift-off, whatever that may mean.

    Lawyers for Britain give their initial verdict, having had all of a day or so to peruse the vast number of pages comprising the deal.

    Download their preliminary verdict here.

    "Were these threats to materialise, that would be flat contrary to the Act of Union between Great Britain and Ireland and would alter the constitutional status of Northern Ireland within the UK. As such, it would amount to a major breach of the core principle of the Belfast (Good Friday) Agreement that NI’s constitutional status cannot be changed without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland"


    "Given its duties to safeguard the constitution and internal market of the United Kingdom and its specific responsibilities under the Belfast Agreement, the UK government cannot possibly allow these threats to materialise into actuality it is therefore essential for powers to be taken which allow if necessary direct effect to be over-ridden under UK law"

    "The first point to note is that these clauses simply do not, as and when enacted, of themselves break international law. This is because they lay down enabling powers to make regulations which would disapply

  • Dr Popper Takes the Emergency by the Horns


    Dr Pamela Popper, an American Wellness "Guru", is filing legal actions in those American states that are oppressing their populations (not to mention a case against the Federal Government for good measure) by imposing medical tyranny. She explains how her cases differ from those that have been heard and failed to date, and outlines the tactics that work and the tactics that have not worked. Good to see someone taking the fight to the authorities, and she makes a lot of very pertinent points.

    Watch on Bitchute here

    Visit Dr Popper's campaign site.

  • How to Deal with the Police - with Robin Tilbrook & Laura Towler


    Robin Tilbrook, solicitor, Brexit activist and chairman of the English Democrat Party, interviewed by Mark Collett and Laura Towler, makes some very interesting points about the way that we are policed in the UK today.

    After covering the usual point (made more entertainingly here!) about not answering police questions, the interview goes on to cover some of the ways that poiicing has changed in this country since the days of Sir Robert Peel, and how it may be best to behave in the event that you have to deal with the police in any situation that may turn adversarial.

    There is a lot of information here (whatever you may think of the interviewers) and I learned quite a lot. Time well spent.

    Like / Dislike this video here.

    If you liked this video, be aware also of Robin Tilbrook's BlogSpot where he comments on matter legal national and topical.


  • UK - Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill 2019-21


    "A Bill to make provision for, and in connection with, the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of covert human intelligence sources"

    This is an extraordinary Bill.

    Basically it introduces one law for the governed, another for the governors' covert agents.

    "Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) are crucial in preventing and safeguarding victims from many serious crimes . . . "

    "The Bill provides an express power to authorise CHIS to participate in conduct which would otherwise constitute a criminal offence"

    "This is not a new capability; the Bill provides a clear legal basis for a longstanding tactic which is vital for national security and the prevention and detection of crime
    (in other words they have been doing this for years so don't worry, nothing to see here)

    "Only the intelligence agencies, NCA, police, HMRC, HM Forces and ten other public authorities will be able to authorise criminal conduct"

    Of course it includes provision for "safeguards":

    "The Bill requires the Investigatory Powers Commissioner to keep under review public authorities’ use of the power and to include information on criminal conduct authorisations in his annual

  • Supreme Courts Reject Lawsuits


    1. The Supreme Court of the United States has denied the request by the state of Texas to sue the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin over alleged election irregularities that would risk the outcome of the presidential election and thus deny voters in Texas a free and fair election.

    2. The UK Supreme Court similarly declined to hear Simon Dolan's appeal for a judicial review into UK Lockdowns.

    Nineteen Republican state attorneys general backed Texas in the US lawsuit whilst twenty Democrat state attorneys backed the defendant states. The Epoch Times has the story.

    (Breaking news: The Texas lawsuit will be retooled to be filed in the four states noted above plus Arizona and Nevada)

    With regard to the UK case, Simon Dolan remarks that this "means that unelected Judges have set a precedent which now makes it impossible to challenge the Government’s use of the Public Health Act 1984 to trample over Civil Liberties and to emasculate Parliament in the process".

    By criticising us for having a ‘Rolling Judicial Review’

  • European Arrest Warrant to Continue Post Brexit?


    Some of us have been concerned for many years now that our perfidious Parliament will allow the EAW (European Arrest Warrant) to live on well beyond its Brexit end-by date.

    Torquil Dick-Erikson writing for Brexit Watch now discloses the confirmation that as far as HMG is concerned "There is no intention for extradition to any EU jurisdiction after the end of transition period to be made subject to a court ruling that there is a prima facie case".

    There you have it. i don't doubt that the EAW will be "renegotiated" post "Brexit" and repackaged to look a little more like a new arrangement, but the fundamentals will remain the same.

    So much for Habeas Corpus and our freedom from arrest and imprisonment without trial for prolonged, maybe indefinitely prolonged, periods. We can still be summarily arrested and shipped abroad to the jurisdiction that we are supposedly leaving next month, without any need to be charged with an offence or to have any prima facie case demonstrated.

    This is not independence, this is maintaining the EU's power to ship off anybody of whom they don't approve out of the UK where they can do no mischief, for what amounts to "as long as they like".

    Do read the

  • British Law and Democracy Further Eroded?


    Jonathan Saxty writing for Brexit Watch draws our attention to the differences that the Swiss canton system bestows upon Swiss democracy, as compared to our own system.

    He also draws attention to the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) Bill  that "affords police – and other public bodies – the power to forgive crimes committed in the interests of national security, preventing or detecting crime or disorder, and for economic reasons".

    For economic reasons???

    "The Bill provides an express power to authorise CHIS to participate in conduct which would otherwise constitute a criminal offence"

    "This is not a new capability; the Bill provides a clear legal basis for a longstanding tactic which is vital for national security and the prevention and detection of crime"

    "Any authorisation for criminal conduct must be necessary and proportionate and compatible with obligations under the European Convention on Human

  • The US Election Process - Biden or Trump?


    For those wondering about the state of the US Presidential Election (and who isn't?), this video walks us through the remaining process. It's a fascinating crash summary of the US electoral process alongside the legal manoeuvering.

    How will this process play out?

    Will it deliver President Biden or President Trump?

    The video Is a bit of a ding-dong  between opposing positions, doesn't shy away from any of the legal and real world issues, and does predict an outcome with a good measure of confidence - very interesting (70 minutes):


    Well, Youtube strikes again - but you can watch it here anyway.

  • "Don't Talk to the Police"


    First let me get my disclaimer in - I am not legally qualified and I am not offering any legal advice here - you take any action on the basis of videos or links on this page entirely on your own responsibility.

    However, this just has to be the most eloquent fast-talking and hilarious "legal advice" that you will ever hear should the time come when your "collar gets felt by the plod". Get your retribution in first - watch it now!

    This is not to denigrate the police force of any country - it is simply to state the speaker's straightforward lawyerly opinion. OK, he is an American lawyer, but do you think that this in itself is significant?

    Watch (46 minutes of spectacularly fast-talking) and see if you don't agree:


    Like / Dislike this video here.

    If you are looking for more UK-centric advice, you may find this site appropriate - but note - this is not a recommendation, I have no idea whether their advice is good or bad.

    See also these official sites: