Legal

2026-04-20

Before we begin, I offer the standard "Down the Rabbit Hole" introductory advice for those unfamiliar:

I strongly suggest that those new to my site should review the earlier Down the Rabbit Hole series, starting with 1 2 3 and 4. 

That said, let's dive in.

There is a growing body of people who suspect or believe that the current geopolitical and national

2026-04-17

It's been a long time in gestation, ever since the UN became the political arm of the WEF and its Big Pharma "charitable foundations" contributors - by amazing coincidence just in time for the Covid-19 "pandemic"!

Now that everybody has been asleep for the last few years, tired of the brain-numbing pedantry of those who would remotely rule over us from the commanding heights of the United Nations global government without the least shred of accountability, the WHO has contrived to confirm the IHR Amendments and the Pandemic Treaty (not to mention the PABS deal) and thus to gain all necessary powers to impose another pandemic at the sole behest of their Director General, one ever-reliable 

Is There Any Regulator That Isn't Captured by The Industry Supposedly Regulated?

2026-04-11

Safely Mapping the derivation / attribution of Institutional Authority, to identify the conditions under which Institutional Authority can be said to exist, terminate, and remain accountable.

Martin Geddes cut his analysis teeth in IT - the unforgiving logic of computers and computer networks - and now applies the same skills to analysis of how our justice systems - or any system that claims institutional authority - actually measure up under formal analysis.

Over to Martin... 

... And how they may not...

2026-04-03

"Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

"Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

I feel that Martin Geddes might agree. 

"This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

2026-04-02

William Keyte has made it his business to investigate our Constitution, which the Powers that Be have come close to denying exists, let alone publishing its existence and ensuring that at least our law officers understand and respect it. 

In fact, everybody should be educated in it and understand its imports, since it is the bedrock upon which our lawful legal system should be founded. Sadly, it doesn't always seem to be so.

Anyone might think that they want us to forget about it, and to think that Parliament is "sovereign" in this land... or maybe the EU, or the UN, or the WEF, the list goes on.

So who exactly is "sovereign"? Monarchy, Parliament, Judiciary, or the People?

William has set up a couple of websites about the foundations of our legal system.:

2026-04-02

The Bailiff Cometh (with apologies to the Gasman)
"Twas on the Monday morning that the bailiff came to call... "

Firstly, ask for their name , address, and whom they represent. You will need this.

1. Establish your ground - literally:
   "I am giving you verbal notice that I have withdrawn your implied right of access to this property, you are now a trespasser, please leave immediately"
   
   
2. "Before we proceed, I need to establish your jurisdiction. Are you acting as a public servant, or a private contractor for a corporation?" (or other legal entity)
   
   
3. "I require the original wet ink signature on that

2026-03-30

With Graham Moore of the English Constitution Society, and EM Burlingame.

"Every 400 years we have to fight this out ... "

"... the reclamation of the United Kingdom, the English homeland is already happening... "

"... they are mocking us by showing how hollow our rule of law is... "

"... you can reverse all this by King in Council... "

(64 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video

2026-03-28

If even the EU Parliament is kicking back against the EU orthodoxy (Shock! Horror!) that uncontrolled immigration is a boon to the EU, then perhaps nothing is as it was.

Could the EU actually be on course to deal with uncontrolled immigration before the UK?

EU politics just became interesting... 

(10 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-03-28

Del Bigtree has been at the forefront of the movement to call Big Pharma and the medical "regulators" to account, via his Highwire and ICAN journalist platforms.

Following in the footsteps of Dr Andrew Wakefield, who was the first high-profile doctor to challenge the prevailing vaccine orthodoxy that I recall (largely because my wife and I had discussions about vaccinating our own kids at the time) and was roundly vilified for it, Del was perhaps the first major journalist to mount an independent publicly funded challenge to one of the biggest industrial groupings of our time - one might describe it as the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory complex. Or perhaps more accurately the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory-BillandMelindaGatesFoundation complex.

Del was led by the Universe to appoint up-coming lawyer Aaron Siri to depose the "godfather of vaccination", Stanley Plotkin, in a

2026-03-25

Method of mass suppression meets weapon of mass destruction...

More documents published recently with regard to Operation Talla:

Memorandum of Understanding between Care Quality Commission and National Police Chiefs Council
"It's quite astonishing that this document in particular isn't ringing alarm bells in the thoughts and minds of those who are indicating intelligence and objectivity"

14/02/2022 Full Fact: Time sensitive, false claims of live investigation into vaccines
"The contradiction: A system in which recording is

2026-03-21

The military are obligated to disobey an illegal order - but in the military, insubordination may be punished by death according to circumstances...

So it's no surprise that refusal of an illegal order is very rarely attempted, and probably even more rarely tolerated. 

Which may explain the suspicion that sailors aboard a certain US aircraft carrier may have been creative about not turning up for battle as ordered in a ship without a functioning sewage system.

Is this the first hint of a more widespread revolt among the military against involvement in a war that some, perhaps many of those who have thought about it, consider illegal?

The Light paper comments.

2026-03-19

Col Wilkerson on the state of the Trump administration....

"... the President must make his decision... in that statutory process - Donald Trump has not used that process a single time... "

So what is the legal basis for the war on Iran?

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-03-15

Yes, it is important, especially if you are on the receiving end of a Summons to appear in Court to answer a charge.

"For a charge to proceed, Criminal Procedure Rule 7.3 requires that the accusation contain sufficient particulars to disclose an offence known to law"

The key word here being "particulars" -  a vague assertion without the said particulars is deemed inadequate.

Martin Geddes illustrates the point.

2026-03-14

The origins and rights of tribes and nations...

"... so i took a female to the location and consummated a function bringing the female energy into the quantum paradigm... never been done in the history of mankind... "

"... when I found a wrong in my system I stopped and fixed it...I stopped and corrected, it's what I do... "

"... the army, the marine corps, the navy, the air force, they are all engaging in privateering... "

(35 minutes)

Like /

2026-03-12

"A civilised society designs its roads for the lost, the frightened, and the mistaken"
"An uncivil one lays traps for them"

Is Martin Geddes writing about those dastardly Russians? Or the inscrutable uncaring Chinese?

Well, no, as it happens.

It's about own beloved (or not) local government, some of whom seem to have taken road "safety" well beyond the limits within which "safety" has hitherto been sensibly confined.

And as one who has indeed cycled the chaotic streets of Shanghai and survived, I can say that the Chinese may have differing standards to ours but their emphasis on safety in street planning goes so far as to give cyclists (they have rather more of them than we do!) their own traffic signals that prevent cyclists from having to mix it with vehicular traffic when navigating through busy road intersections. Maybe we could be similarly

2026-03-07

More legal siege-works from Ian Clayton of Ethical Approach UK with regard to Operation Talla, and the role (if any) of the criminal justice inspectorates in approving or ignoring any constitutional and legal issues that may be relevant.

"The criminal justice inspectorates exist to provide independent scrutiny of the institutions responsible for administering justice"

"Police forces in England and Wales are subject to established statutory duties relating to the recording of crime and complaints"

"The recording of crime is not a discretionary matter"

"The United Kingdom’s constitutional framework recognises that even in circumstances of national emergency, statutory obligations remain binding upon public authorities"

"Where an inspectorate is responsible for independently assessing policing effectiveness and legality, the

2026-03-06

This is possibly one of the longest running legal investigations arising from leaving a vehicle by a roadside that one might hope never to encounter.

As a result, we now know that our UK Justice system isn't what it would have us believe, that it cannot or will not reveal the lawful/legal status of its "Single Justice Procedure" courts if it finds that inconvenient (in apparent conflict with the ECHR rules and indeed reasonable expectation and previous legal practice and precedent).

Has Martin finally drawn a line under his investigations? Time will tell, although given the state of today's world, this question and many others may be about to be swept away under a tsunami of global events.

Read it here whilst you still can.

2026-03-06

The story of the last century (and indeed longer) has been of the ever-onward march of those who would rule the world, and who will stoop to any depths to achieve their aims.

Deceit? What's a little white lie when it advances the cause? Besides, it's necessary if we want to persuade the proletariat that they are doing the right thing for the greater good - our good.

War? No problem - bring in the profits! No need to concern ourselves with the ensuing human misery, it will be forgotten soon enough.

Democracy? Useful for keeping the unsuspecting masses in check, diverted, and too busy with their own lives to worry about ours. Besides, politics (like football) keeps them entertained, and even lets them think that they can control us by voting harder! 

Law and Justice? Essential for keeping the lid on our own illegal but very entertaining activities - we don't want just anybody with a conscience investigating

21:03:45

This is a new topic for Alex Krainer, with whom we are familiar for his expertise in geopolitics.

But this is all about the current parlous state of British "politics".

That he thinks this is huge is significant.

(36 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.