Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Legal

  • Geddes vs Secretary of State for Justice - A Briefing

    2026-04-21

    It has been a long and winding road from Appleby Horse Fair to the High Court.

    The background.

    Martin now takes his assertion to the High Court, having previously exhausted other avenues in his search for clarification of the basic legality of the "Court" that sought to try his original "offence".

    Sounds simple enough, but answers forthcoming have there been none.

    In ordinary parlance, one might say that he has been given the run-around at every turn.

    Will this time be different?

     

  • The Covid-19 Assault on the World - Part 3 - the Department of Defense Problem

    2026-04-21

    Part 3 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (the DoD problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

    "Citizen Petition Series, Part 3 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

    See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

     

  • The Covid-19 Assault on the World - Part 2 - the Gene Therapy Problem

    2026-04-21

    Part 2 of Interest of Justice petition to the FDA (the Gene Therapy problem) to explain the highly irregular Covid-19 vaccination programmes.

    "Citizen Petition Series, Part 2 of 7 — Docket FDA-2025-P-1807 (click to open the public docket)"

    See the full series here, starting with Part 1.

     

  • Seven Part Exposé of the Covid-19 Assault on the World

    2026-04-21

    Interest of Justice have petitioned the FDA to explain themselves with regard to the apparently highly irregular Covid-19 "vaccination" programmes.

    The FDA response is already well outside the legal time limit of 180 days, and IoJ is going public.

    "Citizen Petition FDA-2025-P-1807 is not a normal citizen petition."

    The FDA requires every concern to be submitted within a single filing...   so that is what IoJ submitted.

    "Most citizen petitions at FDA run five to fifteen pages. This one runs well over one hundred and thirty pages of primary filing"

    Don't worry, this article doesn't cover the whole thing - IoJ has split the story into seven parts for publication. 

    This

    ...
  • Down the Rabbit Hole into the Deep Woo!

    2026-04-20

    Before we begin, I offer the standard "Down the Rabbit Hole" introductory advice for those unfamiliar:

    I strongly suggest that those new to my site should review the earlier Down the Rabbit Hole series, starting with 1 2 3 and 4

    That said, let's dive in.


    There is a growing body of people who suspect or believe that the current geopolitical and national

    ...
  • WHO Pandemic Treaty Carried On Regardless?

    2026-04-17

    It's been a long time in gestation, ever since the UN became the political arm of the WEF and its Big Pharma "charitable foundations" contributors - by amazing coincidence just in time for the Covid-19 "pandemic"!

    Now that everybody has been asleep for the last few years, tired of the brain-numbing pedantry of those who would remotely rule over us from the commanding heights of the United Nations global government without the least shred of accountability, the WHO has contrived to confirm the IHR Amendments and the Pandemic Treaty (not to mention the PABS deal) and thus to gain all necessary powers to impose another pandemic at the sole behest of their Director General, one ever-reliable 

    Is There Any Regulator That Isn't Captured by The Industry Supposedly Regulated?

    2026-04-15

    The "precautionary principle" is supposed to be foundational in regulatory matters, yet even to the casual observer it would seem that it is honoured more in the breach than in the observance.

    In matters medical, controversial assertions about the efficacy of treatments seem to have been going on for ever without any clear resolution in sight, and in matters concerning electrical / electronic radiation much the same comment applies.

    In matters legal we might also observe a lack of effective regulation - how can it possibly be ethical to prosecute anybody for offering a cure for a deadly disease without first ascertaining whether that cure actually works?

    So in the age of all things "smart" which invariably rely on devices

    ...
  • Safety-Critical Architecture for Institutional Authority

    2026-04-11

    Safely Mapping the derivation / attribution of Institutional Authority, to identify the conditions under which Institutional Authority can be said to exist, terminate, and remain accountable.

    Martin Geddes cut his analysis teeth in IT - the unforgiving logic of computers and computer networks - and now applies the same skills to analysis of how our justice systems - or any system that claims institutional authority - actually measure up under formal analysis.

    Over to Martin... 

    ... And how they may not...

     

  • The Self-Sustaining Bureaucracy

    2026-04-03

    "Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

    "Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

    I feel that Martin Geddes might agree

    "This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

    ...
  • The Occulted English / British Constitution

    2026-04-02

    William Keyte has made it his business to investigate our Constitution, which the Powers that Be have come close to denying exists, let alone publishing its existence and ensuring that at least our law officers understand and respect it. 

    In fact, everybody should be educated in it and understand its imports, since it is the bedrock upon which our lawful legal system should be founded. Sadly, it doesn't always seem to be so.

    Anyone might think that they want us to forget about it, and to think that Parliament is "sovereign" in this land... or maybe the EU, or the UN, or the WEF, the list goes on.

    So who exactly is "sovereign"? Monarchy, Parliament, Judiciary, or the People?

    William has set up a couple of websites about the foundations of our legal system.:

    ...
  • Could You Put Assumed Authority in its Rightful Place?

    2026-04-02

    The Bailiff Cometh (with apologies to the Gasman)
    "Twas on the Monday morning that the bailiff came to call... "

    Firstly, ask for their name , address, and whom they represent. You will need this.

    1. Establish your ground - literally:
      "I am giving you verbal notice that I have withdrawn your implied right of access to this property, you are now a trespasser, please leave immediately"

    2. "Before we proceed, I need to establish your jurisdiction. Are you acting as a public servant, or a private contractor for a corporation?" (or other legal entity)

    3. "I require the original wet ink signature on that
    ...
  • Rich Investigates British Home Rule

    2026-03-30

    With Graham Moore of the English Constitution Society, and EM Burlingame.

    "Every 400 years we have to fight this out ... "

    "... the reclamation of the United Kingdom, the English homeland is already happening... "

    "... they are mocking us by showing how hollow our rule of law is... "

    "... you can reverse all this by King in Council... "

    (64 minutes) 

    Like / Dislike this video

    ...
  • EU Parliament Rebels!

    2026-03-28

    If even the EU Parliament is kicking back against the EU orthodoxy (Shock! Horror!) that uncontrolled immigration is a boon to the EU, then perhaps nothing is as it was.

    Could the EU actually be on course to deal with uncontrolled immigration before the UK?

    EU politics just became interesting... 

    (10 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • Why Vaccine Companies can Kill with Impunity

    2026-03-28

    Del Bigtree has been at the forefront of the movement to call Big Pharma and the medical "regulators" to account, via his Highwire and ICAN journalist platforms.

    Following in the footsteps of Dr Andrew Wakefield, who was the first high-profile doctor to challenge the prevailing vaccine orthodoxy that I recall (largely because my wife and I had discussions about vaccinating our own kids at the time) and was roundly vilified for it, Del was perhaps the first major journalist to mount an independent publicly funded challenge to one of the biggest industrial groupings of our time - one might describe it as the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory complex. Or perhaps more accurately the pharmaceutical-medico-industrial-regulatory-BillandMelindaGatesFoundation complex.

    Del was led by the Universe to appoint up-coming lawyer Aaron Siri to depose the "godfather of vaccination", Stanley Plotkin, in a

    ...
  • Operation Talla Documentation - Ethical Approach UK - March 2026

    2026-03-25

    Method of mass suppression meets weapon of mass destruction...

    More documents published recently with regard to Operation Talla:

    Memorandum of Understanding between Care Quality Commission and National Police Chiefs Council
    "It's quite astonishing that this document in particular isn't ringing alarm bells in the thoughts and minds of those who are indicating intelligence and objectivity"

    14/02/2022 Full Fact: Time sensitive, false claims of live investigation into vaccines
    "The contradiction: A system in which recording is

    ...
  • The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

    2026-03-21

    The military are obligated to disobey an illegal order - but in the military, insubordination may be punished by death according to circumstances...

    So it's no surprise that refusal of an illegal order is very rarely attempted, and probably even more rarely tolerated. 

    Which may explain the suspicion that sailors aboard a certain US aircraft carrier may have been creative about not turning up for battle as ordered in a ship without a functioning sewage system.

    Is this the first hint of a more widespread revolt among the military against involvement in a war that some, perhaps many of those who have thought about it, consider illegal?

    The Light paper comments.

     

     

  • Trump in Trouble?

    2026-03-19

    Col Wilkerson on the state of the Trump administration....

    "... the President must make his decision... in that statutory process - Donald Trump has not used that process a single time... "

    So what is the legal basis for the war on Iran?

    (30 minutes)

    Like / Dislike this video here.

     

  • Criminal Procedure Rule 7.3

    2026-03-15

    Yes, it is important, especially if you are on the receiving end of a Summons to appear in Court to answer a charge.

    "For a charge to proceed, Criminal Procedure Rule 7.3 requires that the accusation contain sufficient particulars to disclose an offence known to law"

    The key word here being "particulars" -  a vague assertion without the said particulars is deemed inadequate.

    Martin Geddes illustrates the point.

     

  • Oh Canada, Oh World of Nations, Oh Military Commanders - Wherefore Art Thou?!

    2026-03-14

    The origins and rights of tribes and nations...

    "... so i took a female to the location and consummated a function bringing the female energy into the quantum paradigm... never been done in the history of mankind... "

    "... when I found a wrong in my system I stopped and fixed it...I stopped and corrected, it's what I do... "

    "... the army, the marine corps, the navy, the air force, they are all engaging in privateering... "

    (35 minutes)

    Like /

    ...
  • From Horse and Trap to Car and Trap?

    2026-03-12

    "A civilised society designs its roads for the lost, the frightened, and the mistaken"
    "An uncivil one lays traps for them"

    Is Martin Geddes writing about those dastardly Russians? Or the inscrutable uncaring Chinese?

    Well, no, as it happens.

    It's about own beloved (or not) local government, some of whom seem to have taken road "safety" well beyond the limits within which "safety" has hitherto been sensibly confined.

    And as one who has indeed cycled the chaotic streets of Shanghai and survived, I can say that the Chinese may have differing standards to ours but their emphasis on safety in street planning goes so far as to give cyclists (they have rather more of them than we do!) their own traffic signals that prevent cyclists from having to mix it with vehicular traffic when navigating through busy road intersections. Maybe we could be similarly

    ...