EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
  • Public-Party Partnership for Political Ends?


    I seem to be finding more legal cases by the day, and this is another brought to us by the Good Law Project, who have well and truly got the bit between their teeth on holding "our" government to account for their cavalier disregard for their legal responsibilities.

    This one is about their responsibility to keep Conservative Party political messaging out of the government's public messaging. Bearing in mind that the May elections are imminent, this is no minor point.

    It also brings once more into focus something that we may find concerning - the World Economic Forum in partnership with the UN now seems to be running the world's governments, including the Biden administration in the USA and the Boris dictatorship in the UK, as demonstrated by the vacuous WEF slogan "Build Back Better" now also mysteriously endemic across many other "democratic" western

  • Council of Europe Concedes to the ECLJ


    The European Centre for Law and Justice chalks up a notable victory in its efforts to lessen the conflicts of interest at the ECHR.

    "Among the three candidates proposed by the Belgian government was a lawyer employed by George Soros' Open Society, as is often the case. But for the first time in a long time, the Open Society failed to get its candidate elected"

    Don't forget that the UK is still a supporter of the European Court of Human Rights, which is an institution that predates the EU.

    "The Council of Europe governments had been seized following the publication of the ECLJ's report on NGOs and the judges of the ECHR, which revealed that at least 22 of the last 100 ECHR judges are former employees of seven NGOs"

    Is the tide beginning to turn?

    Read the story!

    Sign the Petitions!  (NB: select "ECHR")

  • Good Law Project - Challenges to the Government


    PPE contracts, Market Research contracts, "the culture of cronyism that means top public sector jobs are handed out based on who you know", and other contracts "awarded without competition" (were any contracts awarded through the proper procurement processes one wonders?).

    More examples of alleged cronyism in the award of government contracts related not only to the "pandemic" but to other areas seem to come to light every week now. Is it really just a "conspiracy theory" that such activities are becoming, or have even become, endemic within government?

    The first law of life (and IT): "if it can happen, it will happen".

    The second law: "if they get away with it, they will do it again".

    One can only commend those such as the Good Law Project that are trying to bring these issues to public attention, and are bringing court cases to seek disclosure and recognition of the truth and rectification of the error as far as may be both available and appropriate.

    Read the latest update from

  • Good Law Project Takes the Covid Tests Contract to Court


    The contract in question was placed by the government with Abingdon Health for the supply of rapid antibody tests.

    "The government failed to undertake any transparent or lawful process at all in respect of the award of the contracts"

    "the contract awards led to the grant of unlawful state aid (including Government subsidies for research and components), for which no justification whatsoever has been put forward"

    There is more of course.

    Read the latest update to this case here.


  • Doctors for Covid Ethics Take on the European Medicines Agency


    For the avoidance of doubt, I do not consider this an "April Fool" fabrication.

    PRESS RELEASE: Doctors and Scientists Accuse Medical Regulator of Downplaying COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers

    Sounds serious? That isn't the half of it.

    "Such is the real risk-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 “vaccines”. Either the EMA lacks the subject-matter expertise to appreciate the molecular science of this reality, or it lacks the medical ethics to act accordingly"

    "failure to inform 'vaccine' recipients of the risks and negligible benefits outlined here represents serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights"

    "The Nuremberg Code prohibits human experimentation of the very kind being endorsed and defended by the EMA"

    "We remind the EMA that Nuremberg violations constitute crimes against humanity under the Geneva Convention"

    "For the avoidance of doubt, if your regulatory body does not immediately suspend its “emergency” recommendation of potentially dangerous inadequately tested gene-based “vaccines”, while the matters which we have

  • Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice


    "As families bereaved by Covid-19, we’re campaigning for lessons to be learned as quickly as possible in order to save lives as the virus spikes again around the country "

    "The Government has agreed to order an Inquiry down the line, and that’s the right thing to do. But to get real answers we absolutely need an independent and judge-led Statutory Public Inquiry – where the Government doesn’t get to mark its own homework"

    "Every day the government fails to learn lessons, more families are going through the same loss and trauma"

    "We must hold the government accountable and act to save lives"

    "We have sent a final pre-action letter to the Government informing them that if they don’t take action to initiate a statutory Public Inquiry we will begin legal proceedings to try to secure one"

    This is another campaign to try to use the justice system to persuade the government to set up an urgent and, many would say, much-needed "judge-led" enquiry into the government's handling of the pandemic.

    Already the Simon Dolan case has been refused permission to proceed and the Robin Tilbrook

  • PCP Papers Laid Alleging Pandemic Fraud Against Hancock, Whitty, Vallance & Ferguson


    Finally, it's on.

    After months of preparation, the first legal steps toward bringing the alleged  miscreants to trial for their alleged Covid fraud on the British Isles and on the world are moving forward.

    "In addition to the charges of fraud by false representation and non-disclosure, in material breaches of sections 2 and 3 of the Fraud Act 2006, we are informally applying for a declaration, under the inherent powers of the court, which states that autopsies are to be carried out for all alleged COVID deaths, which will be held as evidence in the forthcoming trial, on the ground that we have expert witness testimony of the falsification of death certificates, as per UK Government policy"

    "We are also asking for a moratorium on the UK flu and COVID ‘vaccinations’ programmes to be declared for period of at least 90 days, in order to definitively establish whether it is COVID-19 or ‘vaccines’ that are killing people at a minimum mortality rate of 377 per 100,000 healthy adults, as per the leaked WHO approved ‘vaccine’ safety study which we are adducing into evidence"

    Read all about it!

    For more details,

  • Covid-1984 Case Update - March 2021 - The Bernician


    The Bernician has been working for some time on the legal aspects of the Covid "pandemic", but actual legal action has so far not been forthcoming. Clearly if you want to take such powerful vested interests to court on such serious charges, you had better get your case straight.

    Add to that the understandable reluctance of any court to hear such a case effectively against a current government, which if proven would probably bring that government down.

    So I have no idea how all this will turn out, but I find this attempt to bring this case to court a worthwhile attempt as it will put the courts in the position of having to come clean about how they will handle matters.

    So this is the latest sitrep - worth a hearing (even if only to hear his interesting comments about Boris Johnson):


    Like / Dislike this podcast here.

    Follow the

  • ECLJ intervenes at the Inter-American Court of Human Rights


    The ECLJ intervenes as amicus curiae in this case pending before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

    The problem is not new - it is the long-standing tendency of the Open Society Foundations (George Soros to you and me) to be involved in funding judicial appointees who then participate in cases which are by no means unrelated to the policies of the Foundations, leading many to feel that the impartial judgement of the court may be compromised by a conflict of interest. The ECLJ has reported on similar situations in European courts.

    This is a well recognised age-old problem for which the very phrase "conflict of interest" was devised.

    The tradition in courts is of course for such persons to recuse themselves from the proceedings, although if the court itself receives such funding it is difficult to see how such conflict could be avoided.

    Read the story here.

  • Is the Governance of America Returning to its Roots?


    This site has previously ventured somewhat timidly into the tangled history of the governance of theUnited States, by way of setting the scene for events which may now be in train to finally wrest political control back to the American people - the much quoted but also much subverted "government of the people, by the people, and for the people". If you didn't read that already, I would suggest doing so, although it is not a prerequisite.

    As far as I am able to understand, following the American Civil War (and maybe even earlier), the previous Congress was effectively discontinued and its powers assumed by agencies of contracted foreign powers - the English Monarchy, the Vatican, and the City of London (work with my limited understanding here). They in turn subcontracted these duties to corporations formed for the purpose.

    "Not only have the foxes been in charge of the hen house and eating well for the past 175 years, they've been

  • The Corona Investigative Committee Strikes Back!


    Sadly this title doesn't capture the immediacy of a certain Star Wars film title, but it will have to suffice.

    We have reported before on Dr Fuellmich and his campaign to find out the truth behind the pandemic narrative that swept the world in 2020, and his Committee has now published their unambiguous and uncompromising report:

    "The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal"

    "... a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic"

    "Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic"

    "... those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages"

    "I will now explain to you how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this biggest tort case ever, the corona fraud scandal, which has meanwhile unfolded into probably the greatest crime against humanity ever committed"

    This is a tour de

  • Now Official - Almost Any Government Agency Can break the Law with Impunity


    Back in December we reported that the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill 2019/21 was wending its way through Parliament.


    Today we report that it has received the Royal Assent and is now law.

    View it here, download it here.


    "An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, the authorisation of criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of covert human intelligence sources.
    [1st March 2021]"

    An authorisation for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source does not authorise any criminal conduct in the course of, or otherwise in connection with, the conduct of a covert human intelligence source (but see section 29B for provision for the authorisation of such conduct)

    "29B Covert human intelligence sources: criminal conduct authorisations


  • Ben Habib Launches Lawfare over the NI Protocol


    Ben Habib explains what he is up to - he is taking Boris to task for the Northern Ireland protocol that is currently dividing the Union.

    Today we are writing to the Prime Minister. This government is driving a coach & horses through the Act of Union. We have no option but to take legal action

    Whilst it's good to see initiatives like this that take the preservation of the Union very seriously, surely the point is that Parliament should be taking the lead here?

    The very fact that politicians are now resorting to legal action speaks volumes about the fiction that Parliament is composed of those who represent the views of the people.


    Like / Dislike this video here.

  • The Good Law Project Wins PPE Procurement Case against Government


    The BBC reports:-

    "Matt Hancock acted unlawfully when his department did not reveal details of contracts it had signed during the Covid pandemic, a court has ruled"

    When the Covid pandemic struck the government allegedly threw all its normal procurement processes out of the window as it seemingly fell over itself to place orders for PPE.

    Many questioned the rationale for placing such orders with suppliers who appeared to be manifestly unsuitable under all normal sourcing criteria, but in any event the government was still under a legal obligation to publish details of its procurements within 30 days after the event.

    It appears that this obligation was not fulfilled.

    The Guardian has a slightly fuller report.

    The BMJ also has an excellent report.

    The Crowdfunder site for this case is here, but has not at time of writing been updated with this

  • Dr Fuellmich Serves Cease and Desist Papers on Professor Christian Drosten


    Professor Drosten was the co-author of the Corman-Drosten paper which first described the RT-PCR test protocol for the SARS-Cov-2 virus. That protocol was quickly adopted by the WHO as their recommended test.

    That original paper was critically reviewed in November 2020.

    It pretty much goes without saying that if the test is flawed then so is the whole pandemic-lockdown strategy and quite possibly the pandemic itself.

    Dr Fuelmich has now taken the next logical step - to demand that Professor Drosten recompenses his client for the damage caused to his business

    Never mind this particular business - Governments may fall if this case succeeds.

    Dr Fuellmich is a German lawyer who also practices in California, where class-action lawsuits are possible.

    Read our recent report on his activities.

    In his letter to Professor Drosten he examines five fallacies that he identifies as contributing to the

  • Class Action Covid Lawsuit in the USA?


    Dr Reiner Fuellmich is a German lawyer who also practices in California.

    He is particularly concerned about the relevance of the PCR test when used as a means of assessing cases in the general population, and for the economic and personal damage caused by lock-downs.

    Read about his project (note: this is a German page translated by Google Translate - you may notice a few oddities :) .

    Also, watch this video:


    Like / Dislike this video here.

    Worth keeping an eye on - a successful lawsuit in the USA would have plenty of repercussions elsewhere.


    See our previous article.

  • Environmental Health Trust et al v. Federal Communications Commission


    The EHT court case against the FCC - first report from the hearing in Washington DC.

    The EHT has published an article including two video reports, one assessing the way that the hearing went, the other an audio recording from the hearing itself.

    I found that latter quite revealing - to a laymen such as myself it seems extraordinary that the FCC (which one might have expected to have expertise in telecomms technology) should have relied on the FDA (Federal Food and Drug Administration) to assess the safety of electronic communications radiations. What were they thinking of?

    Anyway, enough of my legally unqualified opinions.

    The case continues, but Judge Robert L. Wilkins is reported to have stated to the FCC "I am inclined to rule against you".

    Read about the case here.

    Landmark Case Against the FCC - Appeal Hearing


    This case reaches the appeals court shortly, and the EHT provides links to all the evidence and to the livestream on Monday 25 January 9:30am EST (14:30 GMT).

    Read all about the Monday hearing.

    Read the original article.

    Read the first report on the appeal.

  • Anna Von Reitz: Plain Speaking for Patriotic Americans (Several Posts)


    Land of the free, home of the brave- the United States of America - or should that be THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

    Anna Von Reitz has spent many years disentangling the legal status of the various versions of the USA, and what a story she tells!

    "Everything is upside down and backward.  The schools don't educate, the doctors don't heal, the lawyers don't defend, and no matter how much people pay in "taxes" it is never enough, and it never manages to fill the potholes"

    I've no idea whether she is right or wrong, but I have the suspicion that she is at least on the right tracks in many places - some things were made to come under the heading "You couldn't make it up".

    Intriguing question - is "the Donald" about to do some disentangling for real?

    If Trump is going to do something at the "last minute" to upend the biggest apple-cart the world has ever seen, and if there is truth in Anna's investigations, then will these two likely come together in perfect.synchronicity?

  • The Chinese Communist Party’s "Global Lockdown Fraud"


    News today of an international initiative to request the FBI to investigate the CCP's alleged Covid fraud.

    Now if Biden is eventually inaugurated then this will go straight into the waste bin, and if Trump succeeds then hopefully it hardly needs sending - but - this is an extended document that provides a whole host of relevant information that any lock-down sceptic should be aware of.

    "In the course of our work, we have identified issues of a potentially criminal nature and believe this investigation necessary to ensure the interests of the public have been properly represented by those promoting certain pandemic policies"

    "This letter is meant to call the attention of federal authorities in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States (the “Nations”) to multiple points of evidence about the origin and historical precedent of lockdowns; . . ."

    "Given the gravity of the decisions being made, we cannot ignore the possibility that the entire “science” of COVID-19 lockdowns has been a fraud of unprecedented proportion . . ."

    Read the whole thing on-line (and download if needed). Or use your browser to save the page to your local file system.