Legal

2026-07-16

In the 1800s the British and their western allies imported tea and other goods from China. However, China wanted payment in silver, which was in relatively short supply in the West.

So we grew opium poppies in India and shipped opioids to China to sell to the Chinese for silver, which we used to buy their tea, silk etc. The rulers of China objected to this "trade" (some might say "subversion") and tried to outlaw it, so the British and their allies / partners in crime sent their gunboats to subdue the Chinese military and reopen the opium market.

But does the Empire ever give up on lucrative but illegal trade? After all, if one market closes, another can be opened...

(37 minutes) 

Watch this video here.

2026-07-15

Or maybe they simply don't want their teeth pulled? (Don't get me started on the state of modern dentistry) 

Back in May we reported on the Interest of Justice suing the FDA et alfor answers relevant to the roll-out of the Covid so-called "vaccines". Legally required steps were not taken. Allegedly.

"That Defense angle is the spine of the whole thing, and it is where 'vaccine debate' ends and 'federal crime' begins"

"The DoD already admitted the core fact out loud"

The FDA hasn't bothered to respond within the legally required time limit.

Well, if the government set the time limit then maybe it's entitled to ignore it, because who could call them to account? Will it help if a Court would simply set a new time

2026-07-15

The Daily Sceptic reports that the inquiry has uncovered £billions wasted by the NHS on COVID PPE procurement.

As if we didn't already know.

Well it's always good to have a reminder, especially  when there may be an election in the offing. Or not, as the case may be.

Nevertheless, some of the more sceptical among us might consider this a classic limited hangout, admitting as it does the already public knowledge that many well-connected people seem to have made financial killings on PPE contracts (maybe not without connivance in high places) although perhaps (if you could stretch credulity

2026-07-14

It's a bit like the English Civil War in reverse - the Civil War effectively ended with victory for the commercial interests (English and Dutch East India Companies) who invited William of Orange to take over the English throne, cementing the so-called "Glorious Revolution" in place with the new Bill of Rights and a Parliament that creates "Roman Law" (AKA the Statute Book) that has progressively taken over the laws of England, pushing Common law into the background.

Was that when the globalist corporate interests first flexed their muscles to bring about their control over national governments?

Later as the 1700s dawned, Scotland was subdued by the English army, the Ordnance Survey was born, and the Act of Union merged the countries into the political union of Great Britain under the English monarch.

But for whom does this monarch now work?

It's a fascinating argument,

2026-07-12

Can there be so much smoke without a fire?

The Bernician analyses the smoke signals, and reveals a system of revolving doors very reminiscent of those between Big Pharma and our Health Regulators.

Anybody might think the purpose of government is now primarily to launder our tax money to "private enterprise" - not just any enterprise of course, but certainly to those big American enterprises with CIA connections. Of course it's all subject to appropriate restrictions on confidentiality etc but who is to verify the truth of these activities?

What could possibly go wrong?

2026-07-11

That the UK's Covid Inquiry was an exhausting, no expenses spared, root and branch inquiry into the evidence, what failed, what could be done better, and what lessons should be learned for the future, is not in doubt.

But define "evidence", "failed", "better".

Whose evidence?

Who failed to do what?

What would a better result look like and from whose perspective?

HART updates us on what happened to the evidence that they and others submitted.

You can find this evidence at the People's Vaccine Inquiry, because you won't currently find it on the website of the official UK Covid-19 Inquiry. 

"Greater Israel" Takes on a Whole New Meaning

2026-07-10

A fascinating question, but perhaps asked too soon?

I can't see the good Baroness reopening sections of such an expensive inquiry until the new investigations reported by Mark Sextonproduce firm results - until then, it's all speculation.

Still, Mark has written to Baroness Hallett to draw her attention to the new situation - forewarned is forearmed after all. 

We await developments...

(4 minutes)

Read our

2026-07-08

Alert readers will immediately recognise CRN 6029679/21 as the crime number provided by the Metropolitan Police to Mark Sexton and co-complainants in response to their report of suspected crimes committed as part of the official response to the alleged Covid pandemic.

Today may go down in history as the day on which the Covid logjam broke.

The indefatigable Mark Sexton reports on the latest news with regard to Operation Talla under whose auspices police forces across the nation refused to accept complaints about the handling of the Covid crisis.

Before we can ring the bells across the land in celebration of the resumption of law and order for all regardless of rank, there are more steps that need to occur, but perhaps the die is now cast and the direction

2026-07-05

"Violence is never the answer".

Why then might the State reserve to itself the use of violent coercion to control its own citizens?

Nobody wants a violent society -  we are strongest when we work together to common ends, and weakest when we insist on fighting over those matters that divide us. We should accept our differences in good spirit, agree to differ, and work together for our common benefit. Is this not the primary lesson of "diversity"?

Yet if we are offered violence, we are entitled under Common Law (which in my understanding is superior to Statute Law) to defend ourselves. 

One must here qualify that right by accepting that those who would make an arrest (Constabulary or Citizens) are entitled to expect that suspects will cooperate, and if necessary and appropriate may be arrested by use of reasonable force when uncooperative. 

Therefore the right to

2026-07-05

Yes, the "special relationship" is dead.

Perhaps also Scott may like to differentiate between "the British" and "the British Government temporarily in office" in future...

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

(54 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-06-27

This is in effect his testimony.

He has done the hard work and been stone-walled.

It is also his statement of intent.

The Establishment cannot provide an acceptable response.

He isn't stopping... not for anybody.

At last we have somebody who could and may well take the problem by the scruff and shake it out.

The British Public know what to do.

(9 minutes)

Like / Dislike

2026-06-25

Trump is infamous now for not pussy-footing around contentious issues - he confronts them head-on.

Refreshing like a cold shower on a hot day - at last someone in UK politics is saying the unsayable - exactly what the powers that shouldn't be cannot allow, because it risks opening the flood-gates of open public dissent, with consequences no politician can contemplate...

We can't have that, can we?

(13 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-06-24

Alert readers will immediately recognise CRN 6029679/21 as the crime number provided by the Metropolitan Police to Mark Sexton and co-complainants in response to their report of suspected crimes committed as part of the official response to the alleged Covid pandemic.

This document is a reconstruction by Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) which compares the subsequent processing of the complaint from two points of view: (a) from that of the Metropolitan Police and (b) from that of retired police officer and complainant Mark Sexton.

What influence if any did Operation Talla have on the handling of the complaint by the Metropolitan Police?

The Williams Report on the Handling of Gross negligence manslaughter in

2026-06-20

When will those who failed to enforce the law be fired?

Or will our illustrious "representatives" just talk on for ever?

"At the moment victims can apply... "

Enough said.

They are deep in the weeds of bureaucratic process but what we need are actions that underline the immediate need for new management. Firing those on whose patch the crimes were permitted to fester for years is the tone that needs to be established ASAP.

Charges should be pursued where culpable negligence or worse is suspected. The time for jaw jaw is long past.

(29 minutes)