Legal

2023-03-18

Martin Geddes reviews the state of life in Britain under the depredations of the unconstitutional state officials, that further their ambitions by controlling our perceptions rather than by implementing our constitutional rights.

"the craven adherence to rules over conscience is how evil spreads and scales"

"So far no council has been able to prove a lawful obligation to pay; they cannot, since it is debt slavery"

"... in practise we have been ensnared and enslaved via legalese and administrative law, which treats us as commercial vessels rather than living and breathing creatures"

"This was done on health and safety grounds, with zero evidence being offered, despite the law demanding evidence in order to prevent exactly this kind of arbitrary exercise of power"

"It is increasingly commonplace for the state to steal our

2023-03-18

We made a brief comment previously on the Sunak Northern Ireland Protocol agreement (the "WIndsor" agreement) but now we have a rather ore complete assessment of what it means, courtesy of Global Britain. No, it isn't good news for our future independence, but is that what you were expecting?

"There was a break in Johnson’s deal, imperfect as that was. We had the legal right to rip it up. Now Sunak’s deal cannot easily be broken as the EU authority over Northern Ireland and critically the sole authority of its Court of Justice will be embedded in international law"

So one of the major safeguards for our independence has been cut away, leaving the way open for as much future harassment as the EU sees fit to

2023-03-15

No ifs, no buts, according to the ECLJ. 

"This principle was reaffirmed in the aftermath of World War II, after doctors were convicted at Nuremberg for euthanizing disabled people. This principle does not provide for any exceptions to euthanasia"

"The decriminalization of euthanasia is not only a systematic violation of human rights, but also an extremely serious cultural and legal regression"

They point out the European Convention on Human Rights (Article 2): "No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally".

The ECLJ is mounting a campaign to  remind the UN of its responsibility to support the right to life, especially for the vulnerable, the elderly, and/or the disabled.

2023-03-12

"BREAKING NEWS: Emergency injunction and tribunal order was served to WHO and all Criminal Defendants listed below to immediately cease and desist a criminal conspiracy to commit war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and to arrest and incarcerate these criminal defendants"

(The International Tribunal is separate from the International Criminal Court, which despite representations has so far, to my knowledge, failed to act).

The list of alleged criminal defendants is long global and inclusive, and the initiative seems to result from action taken by Pascal Najadi in Switzerland.

"SO ORDERED NATURAL AND COMMON LAW TRIBUNAL FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND JUSTICE

Blaine, WA 98230

Pfizer in Court in Texas for Its neither Safe nor Effective Vaccines

2023-03-09

In the light of the Hancock WhatsApps, Mark Sexton is once again demanding that our Police take action on the Covid Crimes - investigate and prosecute as necessary.

The bland suggestion that there is no evidence of crime cannot be accepted.

"We are calling for Sir Mark Rowley commissioner of the Metropolitan police to reopen and fully investigate crime number 6029679/21 - the biggest crime perpetrated against the British people. We will not be ignored or silenced until the police do the job we pay them to do"

Quite so.

To jog Sir Mark's memory, lest he also be infected with the prevailing institutional amnesia on this topic, this is the crime number in question:

2023-02-25

We've been seeing a lot of Richard Vobes recently, but that's because he's exploring topics of which we really should be aware.

Here he is with constitutional experts William Keyte (again) and Justin Walker (Hardwick Alliance) (again) to talk about the Coronation Oath, which, together with Magna Carta 1215 and Common Law, form the bedrock of our constitutional system of law.

What Oath will King Charles swear on his coronation, and how will it sit in relation to the Oaths of previous monarchs? How will this affect his duties as monarch and his relationship with Parliament? Will it even be made public?

Or will it open the door wide to effective (if unlawful) Parliamentary tyranny?

Why is this important (indeed vital for the future of our nation), and what about his relationship with the WEF?

It turns out that there is a lot to unpack here, some of which perhaps isn't

2023-02-25

Winter isn't over yet, but it is starting afresh for Andrew Stephenson.

As I have no firsthand knowledge of the case I will leave it to Martin Geddes (no, I'm not part of his team, but he does write excellent material so I find it hard not to feature his work) to explain.

Suffice it to say that it demonstrates the way in which corporate powers have seemingly tuned their use of obfuscation and complexity to turn the idea of a fair trial on its head.

Thus effectively weaponising the judicial system against the individual.

Martin doesn't specify the type of court involved here, merely stating that it was a civil case.

Worth reading.

2023-01-28

As tragic events continue to unfold globally, NATO (still!) pushes WW3 via the Ukraine, and the UK political parties (still!) plumb ever greater depths of incoherence, it remains appropriate to remind ourselves of matters spiritual.

For those of you who have not yet sussed our Rolling submenu (craftily hidden beneath the Latest main menu item!) I would direct you towards Martin Geddes, who is very generously chronicling his own journey towards the spiritual so that we too may benefit from his experiences.

I think you may agree that it is no mean thing to open up your personal journey to public inspection as Martin has done - and continues to do - and I salute him for it.

What has TV licensing to do with matters spiritual? Maybe it's symptomatic of the basic need to distinguish right from wrong, fraud from honest endeavour, and generosity

2023-02-22

Where America leads, the UK follows.

This treaty has been subject to much (conflicting) reporting of late, but this is the latest.

The WHO Director-General (currently Tedros) can unilaterally declare a pandemic.

Member states of the WHO would then be obliged by treaty to implement all measures dictated by the WHO.

(14 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2023-02-20

We have reported on this case previously - very previously - but we perhaps didn't expect such a protracted delay in taking this forward.

Perhaps we should have.

Anyway, we do finally have an update, even if it follows a similar fate to Mark Sexton's submission to the Metropolitan Police.

Of course that is not the end of the matter - an appeal is now in train. Mark Sexton's submissions never even got before a judge, so this does represent progress, of a sort.

The judicial system itself is now in the dock of public opinion.

"... it

2023-02-19

It's never too late to learn a new word, and "semiotics" is today's opportunity!

So all you smug intellectuals who already knew it can now look down your noses at me in confident superiority - and provided you limit your pride to your comparative knowledge of linguistics, then I demur not.

So why do I mention this apparently random word here? Well, it appears in the latest contribution to our understanding of the Woke, the Gender dysphoria, and the Transgender indoctrination ideologies that so infect our public institutions these days, in diametric opposition that eternal bedrock of our civilised humanity, the family.

Until now(/recently?) the propagation and upbringing of the human race has been

2023-02-14

The Western media companies like to portray Russia as the aggressor in the Ukraine - but is that so?

As ever, the true situation seems to be more complicated, or perhaps less reported.

Mike Whitney writing for Global Research paints a different picture that certainly adds additional nuance to the situation, or even overturns the western narrative completely:

"... has anyone in the western media reported on the fact that Putin invoked UN Article 51 before he launched the Special Military Operation?"

"No, they haven’t, because to do so, would be an admission that Putin’s military operation complies with international law"

Worth reading.

2023-02-14

Sasha Latypova delivers 25 minutes on the results of her investigations into who exactly was pulling the strings of the warp-speed vaccines, and how it went.

We have noted her work previously, but it is worth repeating as she reveals processes methods and controlling interests hugely at variance with our reasonable expectations.

At 24:25: Pfizer's declaration in court: "We did not defraud the government. We delivered the fraud that the government ordered"

(25 minutes)

2023-02-12

77th Brigade - Oh what a tangled web the government has woven.

"Countering Covid misinformation" was evidently a pastime endemic across media, social media, and government, none of which seems to have had a robust lawful basis in the traditional British sense of supporting our freedom of speech; nevertheless the government seems to have deemed that none of that was enough to suppress contrary opinions so they would have to utilise the army - despite that being explicitly a forbidden tactic absent the consent of Parliament.

Nevertheless questions were it seems asked in Parliament - so if Parliament was aware and yet did nothing, does that constitute implied consent?

Perhaps nobody knew what the appropriate constitutional provisions were and how a correct challenge should be made? Or were they all too busy working from home?

Nor was this solely an exercise in support of the pandemic in any case - "77th

2023-02-11

As previously reported, The Court of Appeal was to hear the case for a judicial review of the Govenment's bland but allegedly baseless assurances that the 5G roll-out poses no threats to human health on 6/7th February.

That hearing did take place and an account of the hearing by the barrister for the claimants has been published, outlining the submissions to the Court.

"On 6 and 7 February 2023 the Administrative Court heard the judicial review of the Secretary of State’s alleged failure to address the evidence of risks to human health posed by 5G technology"

"At the hearing the government argued that there is no duty to inform the public of any risks at all, because it essentially denies that there are any risks from the increased exposures or new form of radiation frequency to be used in 5G

2023-02-10

"If you’ve suffered loss or injury because of Covid Measures in the UK, you may have a claim against the UK Government for causing these harms" (cacuk.uk)

Mina Dew explains the legal case to UNN's Anthony Webber.

"Their case is different from other Covid cases. First, they challenge the pretext of a pandemic, based on available mortality data. They also highlight that the government's "response" always assumed vaccination was the answer. They challenge that assumption too!

"As well as seeking compensation and declaratory relief, they want to use this case to effect positive changes in our laws and in society, specifically:

"To prove that vaccines must never be mandatory (they are “unavoidably unsafe” according to US

2023-02-10

We have become accustomed of late to the to-and-fro between Parliament and the Free Speech lobby, with scarcely a week going by without some development or other making the news.

So it is this week too:

(a) "these malicious powers to electronically monitor protestors were defeated in the House of Lords" (Big Brother Watch newsletter 09/02/2023) re: the provision for ankle-tagging protesters contained in the government's Public Order Bill

(b) The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Bill as approved by the Commons will make employers "liable for harassment of their employees by members of the public that they come into contact with while doing their jobs" in addition to "harassment by other employees". What could possibly go wrong?

Of course, nobody but nobody will say the truth - that all these provisions and bills are in their entirety unnecessary, unwanted

2023-02-09

This is a follow-on presentation from the original interview, but extended to review differences between the various nations of the United Kingdom. And other matters...

"... the second part of the millenium was all about replacing, obfuscating, and confusing all of that with a new system of governance through elected parties... "

"... there's a lot of mischaracterisation of medieval England that's been going on here... "

"... they are meant to be refusing Royal Assent to any Bills of Parliament... that would be repugnant to the constitution and the liberties of the people"

"... the very fact that we now know this is empowering in itself... "

Fascinating!

...

2023-02-08

How far has our system of government, including separation of powers (download), fallen?

Some would say a considerable distance further than most of us realise.

That is for most circumstances understandable - few people in the UK make a study of constitutional law and not very many overall get dragged through the courts to find out the hard way.

However, with our executive branch getting ever more overbearing in nature, as exemplified by the coercion attempted in the name of "Covid", it's certainly time to take stock and work out whether they really have the powers to order us around that they claim, Covid or no Covid.

"The corruption has become so systemic and normalised that it is quite a shock to realise how far we have fallen"

...