Legal

2025-05-23

Interest of Justice addresses the FDA's VRBPAC (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee) May 2025 meeting.

"... all 'regulators' (who forgot to regulate safety) are not going to give up the cash cow easily - it’s rigged and the FDA VRBPAC meeting today May 22, 2025 was to justify more covid 'vaccines', not slow them down or stop them"

(Watch the whole 7 hour meeting here 😎)

Read their report here.

"Today, I am putting you on notice: you have a legal, ethical, and personal duty to act"

Watch the section covering the IOJ presentation below.

(4

2025-05-23

Is A I all it's cracked up to be?

Certainly Martin Geddes believes it to be very useful in making sense of legal issues, where exhaustive searches of legal precedent (or even merely of the Statute Book!) are beyond the reach of most.

And yet... on the other side, there are those who believe that an AI that eliminates the need for people to work in their traditional employment may not be in the interests of the population at large.

The Luddites thought similarly when factories introduced automation to handle jobs previously undertaken by humans, but if they had had their way, modern man would look and live much like pre-automation man and thelabour-saving technology that today

2025-05-21

There are days when I seriously wonder how Martin Geddes finds the time to do all that he does across two jurisdictions as well as produce more articles than I can keep up with.

This is his latest update on the UK Courts (real or fictional?) situation, which is about to hit the High Court as an application for judicial review.

The silence from his accusers is golden in so far as it provides him with the evidence upon which his next legal move will be based - although I suspect that it's unlikely to do his personal finances much good.

It's a nuanced situation, since if the purported Court isn't a real Court then what is to stop the High Court from saying that it's nothing to do with them, and passing it on to the alleged miscreants at Cumbria Police to investigate?

This could run and run

2025-05-20

Reiner Fuellmich is imprisoned in Germany following an extraordinary trial on what amounts to technical accounting charges concerning the funding of the original Corona Investigative Committee, which undertook the first major investigation of the Coronavirus 'pandemic', culminating in a Grand Jury of Public Opinion.

His trial is widely regarded as a stitch-up intended to silence him by keeping him behind bars.

This presentation featuring his defence lawyer provides in depth insight into the conduct of the trial.

(74 minutes) 

Like / Dislike this video

2025-05-19

Martin Geddes (with a little help from AI) relates his lawful activities to uncover lawless Courts to the ever evolving nature of warfare: warfare is conducted by lawfare before ever it comes to force of arms.

"We are now in an era of metawarfare, where the battlefield is not fixed, but disputed—because the war is about what the war is"

"Victory belongs to whoever defines the conflict"

"... To 'win' at lawfare is... to compel the opposition to cease their opposition to truth"

At one level this is obvious, and is evidenced by the oath of witnesses:

"I swear (/ affirm etc) to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth"  

Update from Martin

2025-05-16

Lambeth Council have been taken to Court by a residents group for ignoring their views on an LTN proposal.

" 'Lambeth council chose to spend public funds fighting the very community it exists to serve, rather than sitting down with us to find a workable, locally supported solution,' the group’s spokesperson said."

I wonder what problem it was that required a solution ?

"...the judge said in his judgement on Friday that the council was guilty of a 'masterclass in selective partial reporting' in how it reported the outcome of the library consultation... "

"... it was easier to sustain the cross-party political consensus on climate, via air pollution scare stories, and local chapters of a few dozen Friends of the Earth activists, against practically zero organised opposition at the local level"

Ah, so the problem was that nobody was

2025-05-15

Martin Geddes' quest to get to the bottom of his strange "prosecution" for parking his van in darkest Cumbria has elicited a remarkable response from the person in charge of "Legal and Professional Services, Central Legal Operations", at "HM Courts and Tribunal Service".

You just have to read this, otherwise you wouldn't believe that a senior Barrister in high position would be capable of such a legally inadequate reply.

But in mitigation, perhaps the said respondent hasn't caught up with the AI revolution yet? I suspect that running the FOIA through an appropriate AI would have prompted a rather different response...

2025-05-14

This follows on from this previous article, and a separate appeal for assistance (I don't normally carry appeals for donations because my job is to inform and not to raise money, even for worthy others - I have to have a policy on this for consistency and reputation and that is my policy).

Martin Geddes is personally involved (not as a parent) in a case of child abduction, under colour of law in an apparently legal process, but which upon critical examination can appear to break all the rules in the legal rulebook.

"What many believe to be a system of neutral adjudication is, in reality, a machine that can be co-opted to launder unlawful actions through a veneer of procedural legitimacy"

2025-05-12

The Family courts in current form are a relatively recent innovation. Their main claim to fame appears to be that they can deny that age-old legal maxim that "justice must be seen to be done" (in order save those involved in their proceedings from embarrassment) by excluding members of the public and/or by imposing reporting restrictions on journalists.

In addition to his other clashes with officialdom, Martin Geddes has now become involved in Family Court cases, this time in the US.

"The problem is systemic and ideological."

He is not impressed - nor is his ChatGPT...

2025-05-10

Our readers may already be familiar with the original Corona Investigative Committee set up by Dr Reiner Fuellmich and others back in 2020.

The EU Parliament evidently likes to take its time, but prompted by the indefatigable MEP Christine Anderson, the said parliament has now mustered sufficient support for the project to be birthed. It's been a long time in gestation, and will no doubt encounter all manner of unavoidable delays and misunderstandings before ever it can publish some sort of agreed version of the truth.

They could do worse than follow the pioneering work of Dr Fuellmich (currently sentenced to prison in Germany for his pains), whose CIC has

2025-05-09

Martin Geddes is as indefatigable as anyone, but is finding it absurdly difficult to answer this question.

In reality, t's not a question you can expect a Court to answer - they are bound to say "of course it does" and "we are justice", even if (God forbid) they are all crooks masquerading as a Court.

So he has been researching the possible avenues by which he might get a valid answer from the "justice system".

"... the justice system has no incentive to make the truth discoverable. Complexity is its shield. Obscurity is its fortress"

Has he succeeded?

"My bundle for the High Court is nearly complete — over 150 pages in total"

Well, it's evidently complicated...   even with

2025-05-09

These legal notices are in respect of the USA, not the UK (although similar considerations may apply in the UK, I doubt very much if they would be identical).

I am not qualified in law and this is not legal advice!

This does agree with my understanding of the legal principle that a Legal Notice not rebutted is accepted as true.

Getting the acknowledgement of the parties concerned seems unlikely to be as straightforward as one might wish.

However, if upheld, the ramifications would be enormous...

2025-05-09

This unbelievable report shows how far German Justice has been corrupted. 

Free Reiner!

2025-05-07

Interest of Justice went to court in Costa Rica to challenge the Costa Rica health authorities' disregard of the Nuremberg Codes in their handling of the Covid "pandemic".

We now have an interim update from the Costa Rica Supreme Court, that is not amused by the fact the the WHO has not complied with the timeline set by the Court for production of requested data, potentially placing the Costa Rica Immunization Coordinator in Contempt of  Court.

"... after 5 years of relentless legal battle through Costa Rica's maze-like court system, we've finally reached a critical breakthrough. The TOP judges just slammed the Immunization Coordinator for failing to respond yesterday after WHO's stunning silence on our inquiries.

2025-05-07

Germany may just have stopped the asylum inflow at source - their novel solution?

Don't let them in.

Will the UK follow suit?

It is highly likely that Germany's neighbours will also do similarly as they will have to cope with the backflush. If you can't get into Germany then you will have to go elsewhere or stay where you are.

Eugyppius reports.

Yes, the EU pips are beginning to squeak.

And if mighty Germany can do it... well, the European Court of Justice or even the ECHR may well have something to say about it. 

As may the Commission - I'm sure there are EU rules that this will contravene? But putting Germany on the naughty step may prove tricky

2025-05-07

(6 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-05-07

Fascism is one of those words which student protesters hurl at protestees (is there such a word? I don't see why not) with whom they imagine that they disagree. And it is true that words can morph through constant misuse to mean something quite different to their original purpose, although Humpty Dumpty might not agree.

One might in passing expect students to be better informed, but these days, rightly or wrongly, we don't.

"Fascism" as a word was used back in the day by Mussolini, "Il Duce", and has its etymological root in the

2025-05-04

The system of political parties creates an over-mighty Commons that does not work for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of vested interests.

Representative government is only representative of those who control the political parties.Those who control the political parties control the country. 

Who asked for Ed Milliband and the Climate Change agenda?

Who asked for fluoridation of our water supplies?

Who asked for the uncritical welcoming of migrants of all cultures and none who arrive in our country by illegal means?

Who asked for "Diversity and Inclusion" and "Gender Dysphoria"?

Who asked for the depopulation of Gaza and the destruction of the Ukraine in an unwinnable war?

Who asked

2025-05-02

What has the old BBC Micro got to do with Martin Geddes' legal work?

It's all down to achieving the correct mindset, one that enables logical thought and analysis regardless of human emotion, location, time or space.

Of course no mindset can last for ever - the inner human gets hungry, the lights eventually go out, and the parking lot beckons, but while it lasts it is all-consuming attention to detail.

But will the results ever see the light of a genuine court?