Legal

2025-11-11

Sky News has the story.

From the BBC Charter:

"To provide impartial news and information to help people understand andengage with the world around them: the BBC should provide duly accurate andimpartial news, current affairs and factual programming to build people’sunderstanding of all parts of the United Kingdom and of the wider world. Its contentshould be provided to the highest editorial standards. It should offer a range anddepth of analysis and content not widely available from other United Kingdom newsproviders, using the highest calibre presenters and journalists, and championingfreedom of expression, so that all audiences can engage fully

2025-11-09

Reiner is a German lawyer, licensed to practise in California, the original co-founder and the drive behind the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany that did so much work to expose the circumstances behind the Covid "pandemic", work which was brought to a head with a public on-line Grand Jury trial AKA the Covid Court of Public Opinion.

I'm sure that he would agree that this was a mammoth but necessary undertaking to expose the multiple frauds upon which "the pandemic" rested. If it's not covered by the Committee's work, then it's not relevant.

Following this he was detained (some might say kidnapped) in Mexico when he went there to renew his passport, andwas extradited to Germany for trial, not on the grounds of his

2025-11-05

Graham Moore of the English Constitution Party reports from outside the Crown Court in (I believe) Chester, where he was contesting the result of the Runcorn and Helsby by-election.

Even if he wins the case he won't be expected to become the elected MP, but he does believe that the count was fixed, and the Court may or may not agree.

Count fixing is clearly a serious matter, and this case is of huge interest. If a count can be fixed in one constituency, it could be fixed anywhere. I doubt that we have heard the last of this.

(8 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-11-02

Operation Talla was either:

• the UK's national coordinated policing response to the COVID19 pandemicie: one UK police force working together (sic) under one national operation, or
• individual police forces working operationally independently in accord with national statute and NPCC guidance

"The contradiction could not be more striking. The Home Secretary explicitly celebrated centralisation; the NPCC later denied it existed"

(NPCC: National Police Chiefs' Council)

I suppose we might say that the NPCC's guidance to the Chief Constables was just that - guidance - and so still compliant with the law, but when does "guidance" stray into "instruction"? When

2025-10-23

"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do"

Did it affect the recent Runcorn and Helsby by-election?

Could this determine the outcome of a General Election?

Perhaps on 5th November (fittingly?) we may find out.

(17 minutes)

Like / Dislike this

2025-10-18

Martin Geddes has documented exactly the apparent current policy to replace Justice in this country by a theatrical simulation devoid of due process.

Ethical Approach UK has now nailed this obfuscation as an illegal act which should be prosecuted.

"... the Octavian Principle is not abstract history but a living, often used, institutional risk to modern Britain"

"... where an act is intended to override or bypass the proper administration of justice and has a natural tendency to do so, the offence of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice is made out. "

"Courts have held that even indirect acts, such as creating false accounts, pressuring witnesses, or obstructing investigative procedures, satisfy this test"

It even has a name, after the Roman Emperor Octavian:

...

2025-10-12

Martin updates us on the sorry story (The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair) that exposes the charades that our "system of justice" deploys to bamboozle and exhaust us into compliance with its illegal and unlawful demands.

Illegal because they do not reference real Courts as laid down by law (even where such real Courts may exist!) and unlawful because they are essentially fraudulent, and fraud vitiates everything.

This is his public record of these unfathomable framings, and how the system seeks at every turn to to evade its responsibilities and prevent a challenge from being heard in a real court. Perhaps they really do have something to hide?

Martin 's Public Record.

2025-10-11

This might set the proverbial cat amongst the pigeons. Perhaps it should be banned as offensive to all wrong-thinking people who make it their business to be egregiously put out by anything that they disagree with?

But the truth is that it reinforces that ancient but excellent principle of British Justice that many thought had been abandoned years ago (although nobody quite knew when exactly... ).

“The right to freedom of expression, if it is a right worth having, must include the right to express views that offend, shock or disturb"

Pass me my smelling salts! 

Still, all may not be completely unfettered:

“A person who acts so as to cause harassment, alarm or distress to another may commit an offence”

Now "harassment"

2025-10-09

Come on Martin Geddes, don't hang back, tell us what you really think.

"Proof now follows punishment. Judicial names have become decorative. Mercy and proportionality are excised as inefficiencies. The law that once restrained power now operationalises extraction"

But they'd never get away with it!

"In the vocabulary of legality, it all sounds reasonable. In the language of conscience, it is extortion with paperwork"

So Justice is now subordinate to Jim Hacker's Department of Administrative Affairs?

"Yes, Prime Minister, it's so much more convenient and streamlined... "

2025-10-09

The country has always run on lawful consent.

No consent, no obligation.

But did we not consent to Parliament doing as it wanted when we participated at the last election?

Well, there's the rub. The nub of the problem.

We as a population may have expressed a wish (assuming that the election result wasn't fiddled, as it now appears the US elections were at times fiddled), but how to refute UN-WEF policies when all major parties support the same? It would require a monumental public awakening to get everyone to spoil their ballot and declare "None of these thank you".

So such "consent" is at best dodgy, and in practice impractical. And even if we may be presumed to vote on the basis of politicians pre-election promises and manifestos, we all know how well carried through those promises turn out to be post-election.

Ofcom and the Inversion of Regulation

2025-09-30

Black Belt Barrister lays out Digital Id for those who don't quite get it yet...

Good points all. The Data Protection Act may come in useful...

(18 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-09-30

It's a long time (unless you are our Judicial System) since we heard from my Dazolam, but somehow she still sees to be lost amid the long grasses much favoured by Obfu Scation and Avo Idance and their like, who perhaps cannot be removed on account of possible breaches of their inalienable human rights and must thus be granted Indefinite Leave to Remain regardless of their obvious incompatibility with modern British Values (whatever they may now be).

Some believe that in order to avoid the ever-growing possibility - nay likelihood - of violence, even civil war, breaking out between competing factions within the new glorious diversity of Modern UK (MUK), moves must now be put in hand to deal with the pathetic remnants of population who still support the outmoded so-called "British values", such as "fair play" "tolerance", "freedom of speech" "freedom of association" even "freedom to protest"(!), and waste their time in absurd traditional

2025-09-29

Where are we in Britain now? How did we get here? How do we recover from here?

Watch, listen, take note. He's the only man I know who can place our current political travails in a proper historical context. If we don't understand the context, then we can't map a proper way back to sanity, we can only tear down what we have ...  but what would we do then?

We need to avoid making the same mistakes all over again.

Nobody explains this like David Starkey. If we really have to have a "National Treasure", then he gets my vote!

(1 hr 55 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-23

Interest of Justice are looking into it.

"This isn't charity. It's a criminal conspiracy to bypass democratic governance through public-private partnerships that violate fundamental principles of fiduciary duty and public trust"

"This extraordinary situation means nations must commit to unknown obligations while Gates' position remains secured regardless of outcome"

"Gates Foundation's $912 million pledge—matching its 2022 donation—strategically positions him to control outcomes regardless of how PABS negotiations conclude"

"When the International Finance Corporation promotes public-private partnerships with 'a fiduciary duty to act in the client's best interest,' they acknowledge the legal principle while violating it. The 'client' in global health should be humanity, not pharmaceutical companies or private

2025-09-23

Gilbert and Sullivan had the legal profession weighed up years ago... but sadly the current Lord Chancellor (Lady Chancellor?) fares little better than in those bygone days of yore. being unable to provide a simple and satisfactory response to a letter from Martin Geddes.

But in truth the song seems to have far wider application today, being of a piece with our current world, in turmoil on every front!

(3 hectic minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-20

In Nov 2024 Interest of Justice presented evidence on the Covid jabs from expert witnesses to the Costa Rica Constitutional Chamber.

"After ignoring our formal disputes against their experimental COVID programs, WHO finally sent our case to member states—triggering this unprecedented government hearing about WHO's role in global medical fraud. Costa Rica's Vice President invited us specifically for our expertise on the IHR amendments and pandemic treaty"

Read the full announcement here.

"This case pulled back the curtain on global corruption"

(48 minutes)

2025-09-15

Nigel Farage is "preparing for power" (where have we heard that before?!).

And he has a man to lead that process - Danny Kruger, newly joined from the failing Conservative and Unionist Party.

The video featured today covers this announcement. It was an interesting announcement, although it did little more than set out a few ambiguous hints and tips that may or may not produce fruit in due course.

We on this site don't do party politics, but this is an appropriate occasion for us to draw out a few pertinent points of relevance to the UK political scene.

(70 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-09-14

Martin Geddes has been exploring a few of these tunnels for some time. No doubt there are more to be explored in due course, if not under due process...

Still, his prior explorations enable him to recognise the tell-tale evasions that seem to be required to enable them all. So if one can be collapsed, so can they all.

"Running the whole file through AI has only confirmed what was already clear: the state is not administering justice, it is engaged in systematic racketeering and financial harvesting of travellers"

"This is not just predatory taxation or 'bad government.' It is flat-out treason: bypassing the constitution of the land, enabling fraud under colour of law, and laundering theft through sham tribunals"

"Compared to the ordinary mob, this racket is worse — because it cloaks itself in legitimacy and systematically denies remedy"

Costa Rica Destroys WHO's Competence at "Nuremberg" Hearing