Legal

2025-05-16

Lambeth Council have been taken to Court by a residents group for ignoring their views on an LTN proposal.

" 'Lambeth council chose to spend public funds fighting the very community it exists to serve, rather than sitting down with us to find a workable, locally supported solution,' the group’s spokesperson said."

I wonder what problem it was that required a solution ?

"...the judge said in his judgement on Friday that the council was guilty of a 'masterclass in selective partial reporting' in how it reported the outcome of the library consultation... "

"... it was easier to sustain the cross-party political consensus on climate, via air pollution scare stories, and local chapters of a few dozen Friends of the Earth activists, against practically zero organised opposition at the local level"

Ah, so the problem was that nobody was

2025-05-15

Martin Geddes' quest to get to the bottom of his strange "prosecution" for parking his van in darkest Cumbria has elicited a remarkable response from the person in charge of "Legal and Professional Services, Central Legal Operations", at "HM Courts and Tribunal Service".

You just have to read this, otherwise you wouldn't believe that a senior Barrister in high position would be capable of such a legally inadequate reply.

But in mitigation, perhaps the said respondent hasn't caught up with the AI revolution yet? I suspect that running the FOIA through an appropriate AI would have prompted a rather different response...

2025-05-14

This follows on from this previous article, and a separate appeal for assistance (I don't normally carry appeals for donations because my job is to inform and not to raise money, even for worthy others - I have to have a policy on this for consistency and reputation and that is my policy).

Martin Geddes is personally involved (not as a parent) in a case of child abduction, under colour of law in an apparently legal process, but which upon critical examination can appear to break all the rules in the legal rulebook.

"What many believe to be a system of neutral adjudication is, in reality, a machine that can be co-opted to launder unlawful actions through a veneer of procedural legitimacy"

2025-05-12

The Family courts in current form are a relatively recent innovation. Their main claim to fame appears to be that they can deny that age-old legal maxim that "justice must be seen to be done" (in order save those involved in their proceedings from embarrassment) by excluding members of the public and/or by imposing reporting restrictions on journalists.

In addition to his other clashes with officialdom, Martin Geddes has now become involved in Family Court cases, this time in the US.

"The problem is systemic and ideological."

He is not impressed - nor is his ChatGPT...

2025-05-10

Our readers may already be familiar with the original Corona Investigative Committee set up by Dr Reiner Fuellmich and others back in 2020.

The EU Parliament evidently likes to take its time, but prompted by the indefatigable MEP Christine Anderson, the said parliament has now mustered sufficient support for the project to be birthed. It's been a long time in gestation, and will no doubt encounter all manner of unavoidable delays and misunderstandings before ever it can publish some sort of agreed version of the truth.

They could do worse than follow the pioneering work of Dr Fuellmich (currently sentenced to prison in Germany for his pains), whose CIC has

2025-05-09

Martin Geddes is as indefatigable as anyone, but is finding it absurdly difficult to answer this question.

In reality, t's not a question you can expect a Court to answer - they are bound to say "of course it does" and "we are justice", even if (God forbid) they are all crooks masquerading as a Court.

So he has been researching the possible avenues by which he might get a valid answer from the "justice system".

"... the justice system has no incentive to make the truth discoverable. Complexity is its shield. Obscurity is its fortress"

Has he succeeded?

"My bundle for the High Court is nearly complete — over 150 pages in total"

Well, it's evidently complicated...   even with

2025-05-09

These legal notices are in respect of the USA, not the UK (although similar considerations may apply in the UK, I doubt very much if they would be identical).

I am not qualified in law and this is not legal advice!

This does agree with my understanding of the legal principle that a Legal Notice not rebutted is accepted as true.

Getting the acknowledgement of the parties concerned seems unlikely to be as straightforward as one might wish.

However, if upheld, the ramifications would be enormous...

2025-05-09

This unbelievable report shows how far German Justice has been corrupted. 

Free Reiner!

2025-05-07

Interest of Justice went to court in Costa Rica to challenge the Costa Rica health authorities' disregard of the Nuremberg Codes in their handling of the Covid "pandemic".

We now have an interim update from the Costa Rica Supreme Court, that is not amused by the fact the the WHO has not complied with the timeline set by the Court for production of requested data, potentially placing the Costa Rica Immunization Coordinator in Contempt of  Court.

"... after 5 years of relentless legal battle through Costa Rica's maze-like court system, we've finally reached a critical breakthrough. The TOP judges just slammed the Immunization Coordinator for failing to respond yesterday after WHO's stunning silence on our inquiries.

2025-05-07

Germany may just have stopped the asylum inflow at source - their novel solution?

Don't let them in.

Will the UK follow suit?

It is highly likely that Germany's neighbours will also do similarly as they will have to cope with the backflush. If you can't get into Germany then you will have to go elsewhere or stay where you are.

Eugyppius reports.

Yes, the EU pips are beginning to squeak.

And if mighty Germany can do it... well, the European Court of Justice or even the ECHR may well have something to say about it. 

As may the Commission - I'm sure there are EU rules that this will contravene? But putting Germany on the naughty step may prove tricky

2025-05-07

(6 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-05-07

Fascism is one of those words which student protesters hurl at protestees (is there such a word? I don't see why not) with whom they imagine that they disagree. And it is true that words can morph through constant misuse to mean something quite different to their original purpose, although Humpty Dumpty might not agree.

One might in passing expect students to be better informed, but these days, rightly or wrongly, we don't.

"Fascism" as a word was used back in the day by Mussolini, "Il Duce", and has its etymological root in the

2025-05-04

The system of political parties creates an over-mighty Commons that does not work for the benefit of the people, but for the benefit of vested interests.

Representative government is only representative of those who control the political parties.Those who control the political parties control the country. 

Who asked for Ed Milliband and the Climate Change agenda?

Who asked for fluoridation of our water supplies?

Who asked for the uncritical welcoming of migrants of all cultures and none who arrive in our country by illegal means?

Who asked for "Diversity and Inclusion" and "Gender Dysphoria"?

Who asked for the depopulation of Gaza and the destruction of the Ukraine in an unwinnable war?

Who asked

2025-05-02

What has the old BBC Micro got to do with Martin Geddes' legal work?

It's all down to achieving the correct mindset, one that enables logical thought and analysis regardless of human emotion, location, time or space.

Of course no mindset can last for ever - the inner human gets hungry, the lights eventually go out, and the parking lot beckons, but while it lasts it is all-consuming attention to detail.

But will the results ever see the light of a genuine court?

2025-05-01

The British Military are now hopefully being stirred into action on behalf of the people.

"In  the event of a belligerent occupation by a tyrannical government the military can step in and must step in to defend its people"  Law of War Manual 11.3

Now where did I hear that already ..?

(18 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-04-29

Dr David Starkey argues that we need a new anchor for our English state.

"English is a very new language... "

"Jarrow is the intellectual centre of Europe..."

"How can we have a notion of education that doesn't involve .. the idea of cultural transmission?"

" We peculiarly are a country based in history... "

"We do have a Constitution... one of the most profound and creative in the world... "

Plus an excoriating summary of our 'modern' politics post 1997.

(65 minutes)

Like / Dislike

2025-04-29

This article summarises the problems with the trial held in the Göttingen Court.

We have reported on Dr Fuellmich's activities ever since he started the Corona Investigative Committee, and we continue to bring what we must now call his illegal persecution by criminal elements within the German Courts system to your attention.

Malone News reports.

2025-04-25

In what may turn out to be a last hurrah for the deep state, Dr Reiner Fuellmich, of the original Corona Investigative Committee, who did so much to investigate and bring to light the circumstances behind the Coronavirus pandemic, has been convicted following a questionable trial where the rule of law appears to have been contorted beyond reason simply in order to ensure his conviction.

See the Covid Court of Public Opinion:

2025-04-23

As a committed nationalist brought up in the United Kingdom with a dual Parliament (House of Commons, House of Lords) under the Monarchy, I have deplored the proliferation of devolved parliaments for the other nations that cohabit within the UK. It was always going to divide allegiances as a step towards a "Europe of the regions" for which almost nobody in the country was ever clamouring. There was no popular support, but plenty of politicians wanted it - after all, it was more "jobs for the boys".

So in principle I have never supported the idea that the UK needs yet another talking-shop where politicians can leverage "local grievances" - largely manufactured for the purpose. And if the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly are anything to go by, I'm a long way from being convinced that they work in any way better than the Westminster versions.

But there is one possibility that might under the right circumstances gain my support...

(15

2025-04-23

Martin Geddes has been waging his one man legal crusade to expose and ultimately invalidate the legal mechanisms that are used to bewilder the unprepared, who are "taken to court" by a due-process-free system (= "taken to the cleaners").

"... no process has authority unless it first proves its standing in truth. This is the difference between tyranny and order..."

"I have asked the AI engine to reverse engineer the implied doctrine I am working with, so that others can see how I am working, and adapt and improve it"

Not to mention using it for themselves.

"This elevates the use of AI above mere productivity... it becomes a high-level thinking partner"

So if you feel like taking on a challenge...