Legal

2026-02-06

It's now well-known that the price of gold and silver fell suddenly and dramatically lat week.

"Major institutions used illegal tactics in precious metals markets... "

So - who gets arrested? Who goes to jail?

Oh, I forgot, they don't get to go to jail, they just get fined.

So lets's get this straight: ordinary investors lose out, the banks who profited pay a fine out of their illegal "winnings", and the government gets a windfall fine...

No of course the system isn't rigged. It's all legal and above board.

(21 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Trials work on the basis of legal assumptions, which should be challenged - if you can recognise them.

Readers may also like to note that it would seem that British Justice isn't always as compliant with legal necessities as one might wish. Martin Geddes documents

2026-02-03

Is the UK now a lawless State?

If so, when did it become a lawless State?

And what do we do about it?

Depending on your answer to the above first question, questions 2 and 3 now need some urgent attention.

It became clear to me when the State proposed to inflict a novel "warp speed" (and therefore with untested safety record) vaccine for a "novel" pandemic that had no statistically significant effect on the "excess deaths from all causes" statistic officially published, that something didn't add up. Such a course would be in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Codes if only on the grounds that there was no attempt to ensure that everyone who was "offered" the medication had been able to provide informed consent - on the grounds that they had not been informed. 

Indeed various levels of coercion were attempted in the UK with varying degrees of success. The

2026-01-30

We have been covering the unfolding silence from the authorities on Operation Talla.

Martin Geddes has documented the silence and apparent evasion of the responsible authorities in his quest to establish the legality of the "court" that fined him under the SJP (Single Justice Procedure) for an alleged motoring offence.

It is clear from the investigations undertaken by Ian Clayton of Ethical Approach UK that the authorities relevant to Operation Talla also have nothing relevant to say in response to his direct enquiries.

To remind our readers, Operation Talla was used by the Police forces across the land to refuse to accept reports from the public alleging instances of harm from the acceptance of the Covid vaccines, despite the Metropolitan Police Service initially issuing a crime number (6029679/21) for investigation.

According to law, if a crime report has been made then it must be investigated, which the

free2026-01-25

The UN has abolished itself? A bold claim that requires a bold critical thinker to make it.

Step forward Yanis Varoufakis, scourge of the EU at the time of the "Greek bail-out" (of the EU banks!) , economist, author, and supporter of "the left" (ie: his Left which would actually support the interests of the populace).

"... the United Nations annulled itself when it approved of that resolution...  "

(40 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2026-01-24

Ethical Approach UK has published more documents relevant to Operation Talla.

It's clear that there are constitutional implications that may need to be addressed, but which may perhaps be difficult in current circumstances as set up by officialdom.

"What emerges is not a single policy, but a system - one inwhich speech, regulation and policing converge in ways thatweaken the rule of law and suppress lawful and very often,
necessary dissent, in the public interest"  
policing_hurty_words.pdf

"... while a serious criminal complaint remained unresolved and subject to disputed handling by the Metropolitan Police, the SRA engaged in contemporaneous communications with a third-party media organisation..."

2026-01-21

An interesting report from Dr Rachel Nicoll in the Daily Sceptic today.

Not because it breaks new scientific knowledge but because of what it reveals about our "authorities".

Dr Myhill made the "mistake" of advocating well-established remedies for respiratory complaints for Covid patients, and in consequence was hauled before the GMC, evidently not to explain herself, but to be silenced by being struck off.

But the GMC continued, taking her to court.

Where she was exonerated. Reportedly for the 43rd time. 

"No longer can doctors act in the best interests of their patient with proper informed consent"

"... the GMC is the oldest regulatory body in the world. If it

2026-01-20

Interest of Justice are marking the countdown to the US leaving the globalist governance caravan.

And instigating appropriate lawsuits.

"Nobody voted on it. No legislature ratified it. The UN General Assembly didn’t debate it. It was signed by two men — Guterres and Schwab — and announced in a press release."

And pointing out that under the UN-WEF "partnership" agreement, the unaccountable UN became the political arm of the unaccountable WEF.

2026-01-18

Elon Musk. Who else?

A lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft that makes the Trump lawsuit against the BBC look trivial.

"In Musk’s telling, OpenAI used the nonprofit identity to get off the ground, then pivoted toward for-profit structures and a deep partnership with Microsoft that fundamentally changed who the company served"

Is the ownership of another AI product really that important? If it was launched by public funding of a proposed "non-profit" project, then how come it's now a commercial product? Does that not amount to fraud?

I suppose it may depend upon how we define the term "non-profit"... 

And we could be about to find out.

2026-01-18

Schwab gone, Trump in, record attendance of the Great and the (not so) Good!

What could possibly go wrong?

2026-01-17

This is a wide-ranging discussion that covers a lot of ground.

As a quick hour that looks at the western world's predilection with increased government control and financial developments that all seem to be designed to control and take advantage of the general population...

What's the common denominator?

The expansion of Corporate Control over everything, especially over their regulators and lawmakers.

"... If we are going to have a digital prison we would prefer to have Silicon Valley rather than China..."

Fairly typical of the way in which the real argument is shifted from 'do we want a digital prison?' to "wouldn't we prefer our own home-grown prison?'.

You are sure to make new observations about how our increasingly automated and controlling world is

2026-01-17

Well, some of us are undoubtedly ahead on this topic, but the majority are probably not.

After all, the Law of the land is a complex topic, made ever more complex every passing year to the point where the legal beagles can run rings around the common person simply by obfuscation, delay, and weaponising of administration to the point where one lifetime is not enough to read up on everything that we would need to know to win a case in court (AI to the rescue?).

The same applies to most MPs, who have to cope with the additional demands from their political party in order to (a) be selected as a candidate and (b) keep the party whip. And maybe also illegal demands to keep them subservient to secret agendas from unelected international bodies or even criminal syndicates.

Ok, most people probably don't accept the latter, but it doesn't matter - Parliament is at best a closed shop that places

2026-01-12

Maybe "When it's an mRNA 'vaccine'"? Or perhaps when the FDA doesn't know how to apply its own definition to obtain the only permitted answer?

Not "Newspeak", Good Lord no!

"Screwspeak" perhaps - or maybe "ScrewYouSpeak" - we can never have enough new words to describe the devious subterfuges that officialdom adopts to try to wriggle out of stating the absurdly obvious can we?

At this point the man or woman on the Clapham Omnibus will simply observe that the Emperor is linguistically naked.

Or maybe this is simply "soft disclosure"...

2026-01-10

It is easy, and in many ways inevitable, that past tragedies fade from our attention. Priorities and circumstances change, life takes new turns. We must move on.

Yet there are recent eventsstill that have not yet been dealt with, that cannot be allowed to be forgotten, until the truth has been recognised, the record has been corrected, and indeed the lessons have actually been learned. Moving on whilst these events remain denied is not an option.

Unacknowledged crimes, like Jacob Marley's chains, will not fade of their own accord unless and until the truth is exposed, faced, and yes, dealt with.

Mark Attwood and his guest remembrancers provide timely

2026-01-10

It seems that there is more to Operation Talla than meets the eye.

Firstly a couple of notes which seem to have previously evaded my attention:

Oct 25 - Martin Hewitt's Speech and the Treachery Behind Britain's "One UK Police Force"

Jan 2026 - We Are Living at the Point Where the Augustan Model Is Overextended

Secondly, the extension of Operation Talla as a blueprint for the "European Democracy Shield".

"The world thinks 'Operation Talla'... ended when the masks came off. They are wrong. In 2026, the command

2026-01-05

We can all have an opinion about Trump's actions, but what does the law say?

Which law?

Well, he's in America now, so it will have to be American law.

And there's plenty of precedents it seems...

2026-01-04

Hmmm...

Maybe there's more to this than meets the eye?

On the face of it he has kidnapped a head of state ...   but was that "head of state" properly elected?

Would that make any difference? I guess it's complicated...

(14 minutes)Worth listening to however. 

2026-01-01

Are legal "costs" now on occasion indistinguishable from fines?

Especially perhaps if the Justice system doesn't like you?

Martin Geddes, in his quest to establish the authenticity of the SJP (Single Justice Procedure) which is routinely used to try defendants all across the country, has been handed what he assesses as an exorbitant award of "legal costs" against himself, and suspects that he is in effect being punished for his temerity in challenging the system.

He is in effect being charged for a refusal to engage.

It's a bit like you call to see your doctor's receptionist to make an appointment, but he has no appointments available, and the receptionist charges you for giving you that information.

Do you agree?

2025-12-31

It can now be seen to be true.

The law is for the containment/exploitation of the masses, not for their protection from their rulers.

Martin Geddes has lifted the lid on the situation in the UK. When push comes to shove and the UK Justice Department is asked politely to justify the authority of their courts, their only response is evasion. If they had an answer, they only had to produce it. They have not.

Follow our reporting on this long saga here.

Mark Sexton and Ian Clayton have lifted the lid on "

2025-12-28

If we didn't know it before, we do now.

Auntie Beeb looks to be in serious dooh-dah.

And that's without even mentioning any impact from "the Donald"'s incoming lawsuit...
... even those who love the BBC and dislike Trump may be considering that they don't want to contribute to his costs/damages payments should he win, as doesn't seem unlikely given that the trial is to be held in Florida.