Legal

2024-02-10

"Under this law, authorities in London have granted themselves the power to surveil, harass, and ultimately imprison any British citizens they wish on similarly suspicionless grounds"

The National Security Act 2023 is now law (since July 2023).

One might be forgiven for thinking that we are at war, but with whom?

Perhaps not yet with Russia (although it does get an honourable mention) but that may simply be for want of trying, or perhaps outright incompetence. Don't encourage them.

Perhaps with Tucker Carlson? Certainly there are those who might hope so.

Or perhaps the EU is suspected of infiltrating its agents in a bid to

2024-02-10

Further to Martin's project to expose the lack of legitimacy of the Traffic Penalty Tribunals, he has summarised the state of play as he sees it in a handy reference document.

"The hearing was unfair as it demonstrated the TPT does not have a duty to uphold the law, or act as a court of law, but instead to bows to the opinion of the DVLA"

"The omission of this crucial information constitutes a form of fraud, leading to entrapment"

"The hearing was unfair as the TPT knowingly acted to aid NCC in committing a conversion tort against MG"

The conclusion that I draw is that these tribunals have neither lawful nor legal standing and are simply...

2024-02-08

Ivor Cummins - dogged as ever, has put together this remarkable piece which (a) shows what the WHO is up to, and (b) notes what exactly the Irish government has to do in order to agree to their plans...

Life is about to get very interesting.

(12 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-08

Martin Geddes is nothing if not persistent - but persistence is a virtue.

The panoply of legalese that is ranged against us is nothing if not seemingly impenetrable, and we don't in general have the time or the inclination to sort our way through the entanglements in order to establish the path back to honesty and integrity, so it falls to a few stalwarts who do muster the time and inclination, and are gracious to publish their results for our benefit.

They deserve our support.

Of course that doesn't absolve us of our responsibility to take on the challenges ourselves - in actuality it does the reverse - but it does give us a relatively clear road-map to guide us in so doing.

This is his latest update on his legal tussle with the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, where he is

2024-02-06

I'm not sure about "Nuremberg Tribunal", but the message is clear enough, and the LaRouche Organization singles out the United States and the United Kingdom as primary supporting players behind the stance of the government of Israel and its apparently disproportionate attacks on Gaza.

As always, the waters of argument are muddied by the sheer volume of issues and weight of past history, but the ICJ's preliminary ruling was clear enough, stopping short of a direct verdict of genocide but making clear that all parties should pull back from the brink and permit essential supplies and humanitarian aid.

The reverse appears to have happened, with western governments doubling down on attacks and cutting funding to the UNRWA which is traditionally responsible for bringing aid and humanitarian support to Gaza.

"...

2024-02-06

Martin Geddes continues his siege of Durham County Council, bringing up the legal Trebuchet to fling his Estoppel Notice to the miscreants cowering in their Council Offices.

Which elicited a response that was essentially as expected.

Which in turn enabled him to deliver what he believes should be the coup de grâce.

This would mean an end to any further court actions, so it may be some time before we hear any further news on this front, since it will probably

2024-02-06

Once upon a time (and not so long ago) judges in Britain declared that freedom of speech without the freedom to offend was not worth having.

But under what circumstances does one man's "hate speech" override another's "freedom of speech"? It's a question that our parents/grandparents would not have understood, but with which we today must grapple.

Back in the day, Britain's judiciary used to take a robust view on people who decided to be offended by mere words. Provided that there was no incitement to commit a crime, Joe/Jemima Citizen was invited to take the rough with the smooth and grow a thick skin. It's a clear and unambiguous approach that used to put everyone on an equal footing in law, and facilitated full and frank discussion around many topics that some believe have become treacherous legal minefields

2024-02-03

Message (2nd February) - a recording of Reiner speaking (I assume by telephone since he is held for trial) from Germany.

An interesting update on his trial, and the circumstances that led up to it.

"Only one of these two narratives can be true"

(6 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-02-03

Yes, this is new news of past events, but sometimes we need a reminder of just how "our" Government operates, and no doubt still operates.

If the government would wish to reduce wasteful expenditure that clearly lies within their power to control, then maybe ensuring that their procurement systems are protected from interference, and prosecuting those who did interfere "pour décourager les autres" would be a good place to start.

And the excuse that "there was no time because it was an emergency" does not wash.

In any emergency, the very last thing you need is product that isn't fit for purpose, so the procurement rules on quality control should have been tightened up and rigorously enforced.

2024-01-25

There comes a time when we must call out stupidity, especially when it is clearly part of an unstated agenda, and thus deliberate.

"... pro-abortion MPs, Stella Creasy and Diana Johnson, have tabled two extreme abortion up to birth amendments in an attempt to hijack the Government’s flagship Criminal Justice Bill"

The "abortion debate", characterised slightly less than fully appropriately by the slogan "my body my choice" has been pushed for many years, but when parliamentarians try to insert changes to the rules (to push the envelope into the range of viable births) via amendments to other Bills, and the RCOG decide to discipline medics who report illegal abortions to the relevant authorities, something is clearly adrift with the nation's moral compass, not to mention its legal compass and medical compass.

So without wishing to get entangled in the weeds of the abortion controversy per se (I am after all merely an ignorant male father who

2024-01-24

It seems that "the times, they are a-changing".

We all know that lawfare is an inordinately slow process, and slowed ever further by the byzantine complexity of much of today's (not to mention yesterday's) legislation.

Still, a trucker's a trucker, a man's a man, and a victory is a victory for a' that (yes,it's Burrrrns week!).

"... the decision to issue the Proclamation does not bear the hallmarks of reasonableness – justification, transparency and intelligibility... "

Ouch.

Still, two years to establish that does seem excessive, bearing in mind the draconian nature of the repression.

Will Jones reports in the Daily

2024-01-23

When is an owner not an owner?

It's a relevant question in these fraught financial times.

If the banking system goes belly up (and who would bet against it?) what do we get left with?

Do we own the stocks and bonds in our pension schemes?

Do our pension funds own the stocks and bonds held within their schemes?

The world runs on faith in our financial systems, but are these systems worthy of our trust?

"... the customers assets are taken without the knowledge of the customers, transported... free of payment... used by somebody else and put at risk... "

"... a derivative is a financial contract written about the behaviour of something else... "

"... you are 'not exposed' to the failure of a counterparty

2024-01-19

I guess this is a topic in which a large number of motorists will have an interest - if not today, then tomorrow!

With "Low Emission" zones proliferating like the proverbial rabbits, there cannot be many who will never run foul of some restriction or other - even when well signed, it can be well-nigh impossible to scan all the street furniture, identify all the signs, then read and understand them, whilst simultaneously taking care to avoid rear-ending the vehicle in front.

So Martin, having been picked out for driving his (not commercial) van in an area where only private cars are permitted free passage, has decided to contest the claimed infraction on the basis that his van is a private conveyance in all significant respects and is therefore permitted free passage.

Of course, as he digs deeper he uncovers more issues... which seem as if they may have parallels with the Council Tax situation. Quelle surprise!

LaRouchePAC Addresses the State of World Events

2024-01-13

The latest legal exchange between Mr Geddes and the Chief Executive of Durham County Council makes interesting reading (previous reports here).

"This act moves me 2/3 of the way through the three notice estoppel process. This process, once complete, prevents Durham County Council from making any future claim that a council tax liability order exists and that there is an enforceable debt"

Not quite the full works yet, but getting there...

2024-01-12

British barrister Professor Malcolm Shaw KC represents Israel at the ICJ.

(3 hrs 11 mins)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2024-01-11

Irish lawyer Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC is reportedly part of South Africa’s legal team that has lodged an application against Israel, with respect to their actions in Gaza, in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague.

The allegation is "genocide".

This is her address to the ICJ.

(30 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2024-01-10

From the Ministerial Foreword by the Rt Hon Steve Barclay:

"I have learnt that farming is fundamental to the UK’s rural economy, the environment and of course our food security"

"... I am setting out the biggest upgrade to farming schemes since the UK has had the freedom to design our own schemes"

We voted "Leave" in 2016.

The original Agricultural Transition Plan was published in 2020.

By comparison, Covid struck in January-ish 2020, the Coronavirus Act 2020 (348 pages) had received the Royal Assent by July 2020. 

"... we need to see universal adoption of farming regulatory standards and at least 70% of farmers

2024-01-07

What is the "Occult"? That which is hidden. 

How are things hidden? Behind something else.

Behind what exactly? Behind any one or more of a whole list of items and factors (limited only by the imagination of the sorcerer) that prevent us from seeing it. Including distraction to ensure that the subject pays no attention to the reality...

Fortunately, Alan of Salisbury is at hand to explain.

It's a long list, but presented in two parts, each from a different standpoint - which is required if you are trying to uncover the full situation.

(50 minutes) Part 1: The original presentation:

Like / Dislike this video

2024-01-06

In the aftermath of the Covid imbroglio (not to mention the Nuremberg trials) we are now aware I think that our medical profession (egged on by sundry "experts" government officials and other agencies) fell very short of advising everybody of the real risks of the "emergency use authorisation" "vaccines", with consequences that they seem very keen not to explore.

So it is indeed (as it always was) up to "we the patients" to ask the right questions when we are offered a treatment by "our" NHS, or by any other health practitioner.

But - what are the right questions?

Inevitably perhaps, it's not as clear-cut as we might like, and I doubt very much if anybody is taught about this in school these days (nor were we in my schooldays either). But not asking the right questions (and not recognising unsatisfactory answers!) can have severe life-changing consequences - and it won't be much consolation to be told that that consequence is "very