Legal

2023-01-07

As always, he makes the unanswerable case.

Our MPs are complicit in their absence. They are complicit in the ongoing fake vaccination programme, even though there is clearly no cause for it that has not been long discredited.

Will they be complicit in the next restrictions? 

We need to go back to first principles.

What will it take?

(15 minutes)

2023-01-06

"Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent"

"He trusts the Swiss judicial system, is confident that the Truth will come to light, and sends a message of hope that justice will indeed prevail"

Reiner Fuellmich continues his work with the ICIC.

"This is the most important case that I can imagine..."

(28 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

2022-11-17

"This action is against 388 federal officers in their official capacities which include President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr, Vice President Kamala Harris, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Michael Richard Pence (“Respondents”)... "

"Respondents were properly warned and were requested to make an investigation into a highly covert swift and powerful enemy, as stated below, seeking to destroy the Constitution and the United States"

"... During this Proceeding over 100 members of U.S. Congress claimed factual evidence that the said election was rigged. The refusal of the Respondents to investigate this congressional claim (the enemy) is an act of treason and fraud by Respondents"

"Due to the fact that this case represents a national security breach on a unprecedented level like never before seen seriously damaging and violating XXX and coincidently effects every citizen of the U.S.A. and courts of

2022-11-17

We thought it would never happen, but maybe elections (no matter how badly run) do matter after all.

The "national emergency" that turned out to be for a virus that was no more deadly than the annual flu has been relentlessly extended every time it threatened to expire, for no obvious reason (other than to prolong the legal ability to push vaccines under an Emergency Use Authorisation).

"The Senate passed a measure in a 62–36 bipartisan vote to end the emergency, which was initially declared on March 13, 2020"

...thus putting them on a collision course with "President" Biden, who has threatened a veto. I wouldn't doubt that the new House of Representatives will align with the Senate on this issue, so we'll see how long the Pretendency holds out.

High time.

2022-11-11

It's always good to hear of a successful skirmish against the mighty (anti-)social media cartels, and even better on the all-too-rare occasion when the protagonist is actually a member of the political classes, in this case MEP Christine Anderson. She has been putting Ms van der Leyen, Albert Boura (Pfizer) et al through the wringerof the EU parliamentary committee system.

Who would have thought that a Parliamentary Committee could cause such upset? This may even be something that the EU does better than our own "mother of parliaments" in the UK, where the debate on vaccine safety was confidently talked out by those with ears and minds tight closed. 

Well, YouTube considered

2022-11-10

Child sexual education has been taken over by the State without so much as a by-your-leave from the electorate.

Want to know more?

Public Child Protection Wales has taken the bull by the horns with a 30-hour podcast-athon! Well, what else is to be done when you need funds to feed the lawyers?

Nov 5th 30hr Podcast-athon to help raise funds for Public Child Protection Wales

Round 2 Fundraiser for PCP Wales  (10 hrs 51 minutes)

(NB: The gaps in the hours listed below are not found on Rumble)

...

2022-10-20

"But as is said, freedom is not given, it is taken. And, we must take back our freedoms"

"... the people in the spotlight are too busy talking to listen"

"[Russell created the Quantum Grammar and Claim of the Life system so that we have a chance to learn how to live in peace by communicating in a mathematically certifiable construct... "

"FOR THE COMPREHENSION OF THE BAD-HOMBRES-RUNNING-SHOWS-DONE IS WITH THE CITIZENS’-CORRECTION BY THE [A]WAKE"   ( ... it's up to us, guys & gals)

"FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE VOID-NEED-WARS IS WITH THE STUDY OF THE HIS-STORY-FICTION WITH THE VACATE-PSYOP-PROPAGANDA BY THE STUDENT" (... do your research - history is propaganda)

"FOR THE START OF THIS OUR-STORY/MY-STORY IS WITH THE CLAIM OF THE LIFE BY THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL:

2022-10-19

Language can be a beast.

As anyone who has ever written an email can probably attest, the meaning that we attribute to that email can be completely misinterpreted by the recipient. It turns out that words and phrases can mean different things to different people, and misunderstandings are consequently not uncommon, even without the assistance of Google Translate.

Part of the problem is context - if I say something in the course of a conversation, the listener will automatically try to understand it in that context. Emails may not provide that luxury.

Part of the problem may be cultural, as words can have different meanings or even nuances for different cultures.

Sometimes it's just sloppy sentence construction, as in "alumni of academia like John Hopkins" - where its unclear from the grammar whether the qualification "like John Hopkins" applies to "academia" or to "alumni".

...

2022-10-14

Firstly, the Council of Europe is not to be confused with the European Council (which is the EU's highest committee of Heads of State).

The Council of Europe was formed in 1949 (well before the EU) to promote democracy and human rights, and it boasts a Parliamentary Assembly. The UK retains its membership of the Council of Europe.

"This Assembly retains at least one important prerogative, that of electing the judges to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)"

A prerogative that may not have been always conscientiously exercised.

Of course, the Covid pandemic has left its mark on this

2022-10-04

Martin Geddes is in effect sharing his journey of awakening with us, and I am grateful to him for opening his heart and mind to us, for that makes it easier for us to understand our own progress and the progress of those near and dear to us.

It's not always simple. Here he is talking of the difference between contracts (so beloved of our legal beagles that they seek to entangle us in acres of notorious fine print hidden behind a tick-box before we can so much as order a bar of soap on-line) and covenants.

Various dictionaries seem to consider that a covenant is a contract, but nuances are important here.

The original Covenant (as far back as written records reveal) is probably the Biblical covenant between God and his biblical families and peoples,

2022-10-01

James Harvey has been making a name for himself (Students Against Tyranny, Voice of Wales, UNN) by taking the weapon of publicity to the authorities, and if you have a mind to spend a half hour listening to this interview you will learn how some of those who were arrested at the 2020 Covid demonstrations experienced our police and judicial systems.

It's an interview that makes a pleasant change from the polemics of the commentators, and brings out the human aspects of these experiences in a manner that I found quite engaging.

Our future is safe with young people like these.

And it's not all bad news!

(32 minutes)

2022-09-27

I found this article of interest, not because I am fascinated by the complexities of law but because it seems that these largely unknown unrecognised and unacknowledged complexities may be cause for serious concern, given that the ostensible function of a court is to achieve justice.

I'm sure there is a lot more here than meets the eye, but some of the historical developments noted certainly provide an interesting glimpse of the legal mindset as it has evolved over the years.

I'm sure that this website holds many more items of interest for those that wish to explore further.

Canon 3228 : The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Whilst

2022-09-27

We first reported on this from the viewpoint of Reiner himself, so today we redress the balance by bringing you Viviane Fischer's explanation of the rift.

A sorry tale indeed, and one that should never have been allowed to fester for so long.

As always, it's your judgement that counts.

(10 minutes) German with English subtitles

And here, Reiner responds more directly to Viviane's assertions. The subtitling seems to be by AI and is tricky to follow, but you do get the gist... 

Reiner Fuellmich Leaves the Corona Committee!!

2022-09-23

So what's new you ask?

And anyway, the UK isn't demanding coerced injections any more...   but if any employer in the UK is so doing (or tries it on once more), the law (according to "down under") is on your side.

No, it's not really anything new, but it is a new twist that potentially evens the argument. Instead of arguing against your possibly remote and effectively faceless employer, you can argue with the person waiting to inject you.

This could even the odds up considerably.

Of course the Australian precedent may not be recognised in a UK Court, but coerced medical intervention (especially with a needle) has always been considered assault and battery under Common Law (in my understanding).

So ask the person wielding the needle their identity and tell them that you are being coerced to take the jab, pointing out that they will be guilty of assault if they do