Legal

2025-02-18

This harks back to our 2023 report concerning the then UK Digital Identity and Attributes Trust Framework beta version (0.3) updated 11th January 2023 (CBDC / Citizen Id by whatever means?).

As explained in that video,this was an unremarkable update to a previous Act, introduced as a administrative update that didn't require Parliament to vote upon it.

If you didn't watch that, I suggest you watch it now.

We've had a lot of water beneath the Parliamentary bridge since then, yet it seems that the Labour Government for whatever reason decided in December 2024 to make a proper Bill out of it, even though the consultations on the areas covered by the

2025-02-16

Martin Geddes is now making so much use of AI that his productivity of articles is hard to keep up with!

Whether or not this particular article was AI-enabled, it is admirably laid out and clearly explains the precise alleged infractions of the law that pertain to the way that the case against him has been handled.

Now one might think that this is in point of fact a pretty trivial case, so pay up shut up and get on with life - but that isn't so. If the police themselves are not operating lawfully then that really is a very serious issue, and they need to be taken to task.

Martin has documented the whole argument very thoroughly and provided copy of his responses - I don't doubt that anybody in similar

2025-02-13

Martin Geddes (yes, he again) now summarises (with a little help from ChatGPT) just why he considers that Durham County Council may be outside the law in terms of its council tax enforcement processes.

That isn't at all to say that all councils are similarly suspect - I have no details - but nor can I rule it out, especially as many of them, like CDOS (see the article) will be members of the CIVEA (Civil Enforcement Association) and may be thought likely to have similar systems to Durham CC.

"These assaults on the public appear to be war crimes (as enemy combatants), crimes against humanity, and terrorist attacks — so fall under international human rights law and military jurisdiction"

Is Your Council Tax Enforcement Really Fraudulent?

Whatever the truth of all this is, it is also true

2025-02-12

Elon Musk's DOGE is showing how to deal with those on the take.

As part of its investigations into Government Efficiency it will investigate those who have somehow appeared to acquire huge wealth despite being on salaries that could not have produced such wealth.

Now it's quite possible these days to buy and sell crypto (Bitcoin for example) at precisely the right time, and make a fortune, but it's not exactly commonplace.

So employees of agencies which misspent government funds, and who appear to have acquired wealth beyond scope of salary, would, bearing in mind the public interest, seem to have little potential for any automatic benefit of the doubt, and should be nicely asked to account for their good fortune. As always, they do not have to comply with a polite request if they do not so wish, but those who have good explanations could set the investigators minds at rest. The burden of proof still rests with any potential

2025-02-12

This Bill, currently wending its way through Parliament, looks set to reach the Statute Book just as soon as their Lordships have finished with it and passed it on to the Monarch for his Royal Assent.

Given that the Labour Party has a stonking majority in the Commons, there will be no delaying its arrival before their Lordships.

Given also the Government's obsession with ultimately centralising all powers of any note unto itself, it's no surprise that this bill is long on rhetoric and very very short on devolution (after all, if it started devolving powers to, say, parents, there would be a chaotic free-for-all and the government would have nothing to do except twiddle its thumbs and dream of powers forsaken).

Let us in the interests of brevity quote directly from the government's own "Policy Summary Notes" document:

The ambitions of

2025-02-10

Or should that be the Public in the cross-hairs?

Or, given that the Big Tech companies may have been creations of the CIA, might it be that the government merely wants access to the data to which the CIA already has access?

These days it's necessary to cover all the angles.

The story is that the UK Government wants access to the encrypted data that Apple holds on their customer's behalf - all you iPhone and Mac users, pay attention!

I wonder how that plays out against the Data Protection laws? I'm sure somebody has thought that one through.

Besides, surely only criminals would deny the government this information?

Still, if you must keep certain information secret, don't put on the internet.

2025-02-02

Freedom is to have a choice about everything we do, with the proviso that we don't do anything to the detriment of the freedoms of others.

It is in effect freedom of choice. To choose where we go on holiday, to choose for whom we work, to choose our careers (should we be so fortunate as to understand what sort of career we both want and are suited for), to choose by mutual agreement those whom we will marry - or to choose celibacy.

Nobody doubts that of all these freedoms, some choices may actually be mutually incompatible (we in England cannot travel to the Isle of Man by train) but that's life. Some may turn out later to be incompatible (too many marriages do end in divorce) but the principle is that in the end there should be nobody to blame for our successes or failures but ourselves. We are here to make errors and to learn from them.

Of course governments of all hues and proclivities like to control (ie: limit) our freedoms so that we do what they

2025-01-31

: Russell-Jay: Gould promotes his legal grammar which many no doubt find confusing, but in this video he relates the story of how he learned about legal grammar, in the courtroom.

Hopefully we can find a few more understandings of this clicking into place whilst we watch it.

Bon voyage ..!

(16 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

See also: What is the Truth? 

2025-01-30

Following on from the earlier Brick in the Wall communication (which of course we all watched mulled and eventually fully understood), this video starts by reviewing the Trump "inauguration".

"... they had to break that because there is no corporate and there is no spirit within the corporate..."

"... unfortunately the general public is not aware of the joke... "

Is nothing is as it appears?

I suspect so. The style of delivery is demanding of his viewers, but if we want the truth we need to work at it, as it has been forever obscured beneath multiple layers of fiction.

We are facing the deepest Challenge of the Assumptions! 

Still, one can begin to piece together certain

2025-01-28

The Brownstone Institute reviews a number of "the Donald" 's executive orders that have slapped a wide-ranging communications ban on the US public health bureaucracies.

One might speculate that investigative measures may follow in due course, with consequences that only a few outside of the medical-pharmaceutical-public-health bureaucracies may foresee.

"One Health, as newly embraced by the CDC, amounts to a radical transformation of the basis of social order itself, under the guidance of god-like scientists who alone know how to structure the best life for all living things"

"How it came to be that our main engines of public health came to be captured in whole by such a crazed ideology would require a deep and expansive investigation"

"Now Dr.... heads the agency he defied. He remains in that position until the man once called a “fringe epidemiologist” by the previous head of NIH takes

2025-01-28

This is the latest article from Martin Geddes.

If you only ever read one of his articles, read this one, very carefully, and watch the linked video.

The wheels of justice grind slow, but they grind to dust. But these particular wheels will likely grind much faster than anybody is prepared for - if my understanding is correct.

It illuminates cartels in a whole new light.

Maybe there was a reason that Trump wanted TikTok reinstated in America.

I am no lawyer, and this is not legal advice. Please do your own due diligence.

2025-01-27

A everybody no doubt realises, Baroness Hallett's "Covid Inquiry Module 4" hearings grind on, succumbing to handy confusions over terminology which would be unacceptable in a school debating society.

Are the differences between Process 1 and Process 2 the same as the differences between Processes A and B?

I suppose it depends on how closely and confidently you were able to attend and decipher the long and rambling question.

"The inquiry has thus enabled a situation where the primary failing of the MHRA has apparently been denied. The truth can now be dismissed as yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ "

Happily for us mere mortals, the Perseus Group (who they?) has form in questioning the response of the UK medical regulators to the Covid alleged pandemic, and

2025-01-27

No, apparently his case has not fallen by the wayside, it is progressing on the basis of factual discovery.

Of course that means a delay whilst the necessary facts are discovered, and brought before the Court, but hey, that can't be too difficult for our safety-conscious no-stones-unturned medical-pharmaceutical-political complex can it? 

They have been given 3 days (until tomorrow 28th January).

Place your bets now...

2025-01-27

Martin Geddes provokes our little grey cells once more.

His journey from matters material/commercial through matters legal and on to matters spiritual has been a fascinating tale, and has exposed how he considers that the matters legal may conflict with both the spiritual and the inappropriate implementation of the legal.

Javier Milei encapsulated the folly of trying to legislate for every possibility when he noted "the infinite expansion of the aberrant state" in his recent address to Davos 2025, although he probably had more in mind than just rules and regulations (the State being very prone these days to extend its reach into control of matters parental and much else besides).

Jesus himself set the scene where the Bible records

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-18

This guy isn't the most straightforward to understand, but I suspect nor is he to be ignored.

In a world that seems increasingly likely governed by a fraudulent system centred on the United Nations, we are overdue a Great Reset away from the current legal jurisdiction of the Law of the Sea, toward a simpler law of the land.

Exactly how this may play out has so far defeated my understanding, but in principle I warm to it.

Given the events due to start tomorrow (19th and 20th January) in DC, it would rather stretch belief to blithely assume that this is unrelated.

(10 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-01-10

"We have not had a Republic since at least 1871.. "

"We the people have been brainwashed, programmed, tricked... "

"... NO! We are the government, 'We the People'... "

" How do you have a Territory get a Statehood? Here's the checklist... "

" They were able by November 2010 to get the Republic restored "

"... he was on President Biden's clemency list... "  

(57 minutes)

2025-01-08

A tale of incompetence, or of deliberate obfuscation?

We may never know, but it's a salutary story that leaves Canada...  well, apparently in some sort of legal limbo (don't quote me, I'm not a constitutional lawyer!).

If this could happen to Canada, what other prior colonies might be similarly affected?

And how might this affect the coming changes that 2025/6 may or may not bring forth?

Not to mention anybody with a "Canadian passport"?

(49 minutes)

2024-12-27

Can AI be useful in challenging the iniquities of the current allegedly fake legal system?

The Law is a monstrous edifice of common law accepted principles, parliamentary statutes, regulations, judges, barristers, regulators, codes of conduct which may or may not be legally binding, all given force by case law (a statute does not become law until the courts have ruled on relevant cases).

Oh, and ignorance of the law is no excuse!

So the man or woman on the Clapham omnibus may feel that the odds in court are stacked against him/her. How to understand it all? How to identify the weak points in a case? How to present those points in the best way to achieve a just and successful outcome?How to devise tactics appropriate to the circumstances? How to find the time to understand it all, or even find a competent and trustworthy lawyer (should such be affordable)?

...

2024-12-18

Interest of Justice reports that Costa Rica is holding Huawei accountable in the Courts for "alleged corruption and misconduct" in relation to its 5G network.

"By addressing corruption and cybersecurity risks associated with 5G networks, Costa Rica is proving that even a small nation can take on powerful entities to safeguard its people and principles"

"... accusations include fraud, bribery, influence peddling, and actions against the public treasury related to contracts for 3G and 5G deployment"

"The Chinese Embassy in Costa Rica swiftly condemned these actions, labeling the allegations against Huawei as “irresponsible and unfounded”

Read the full story.