Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

A Concise History of the "Climate Change" Dogma

Details: Category: Green; Published: 15 January 2025; Hits: 14

2025-01-15

Well, it's certainly an opportune time to review how we got here on a number of fronts, so here is a very useful summary of all the major features of these so far unproven assertions.

"If you still buy into the man-made global warming narrative and are willing to surrender your sovereignty, not just for yourself, but for your family, your community, and your country, to a group of elitist globalists who fear you, then that's truly something"

"If CO₂ were responsible for trapping heat in Earth’s atmosphere, we would see a direct, measurable correlation between CO₂ concentrations and global temperatures. But we don’t"

"The Earth is a self-regulating, closed system. When temperature increases, CO₂ is released from oceans, permafrost, and soil, but it’s the temperature that initiates the release, not the other way around"

OK, the earth is by no means a "closed system" as it accepts copious amounts of heat and light directly from the sun, and radiates the same overnight back into space. Otherwise the statement seems to be substantially correct if we can ignore fluctuations in the earth's and sun's output from one year to the next. Of course that would be extremely unwise as there is no reason to suppose that either's output is consistent - but the climate catastrophists make exactly that supposition too, so we are simply arguing on like basis.

"The push for carbon taxes, energy controls, and global governance isn’t about saving the planet, it’s about creating a new system of control, where elites dictate the flow of energy and, by extension, control economies and governments"

Proof of motivation is supposedly hard to come by, but there is Biblical support for supposing that actions betray motivation (and it's simply common sense).

"The High Court Judge said that the Government’s distribution of An Inconvenient Truth to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children"

This is an excellent article that covers most of the salient points - hopeless rate of successful predictions, cyclical inconsistency in those predictions, and co-option of the political classes to (sadly successfully) indoctrinate our schoolchildren with their unproven nonsense.

Climate Change must be the most complex "science" known to man, with vast numbers of interacting variables that defy the 80 - 20 rule (that 20% of them are significant and the remainder are not), for many of which we may have no accurate historical records to guide us.

It certainly is not yet "settled" - indeed, according to the scientific method, science is never settled, it's only temporarily agreed upon until a better theory can find acceptance. Thus was Newton's theory of gravitation superseded by Einstein's theory of relativity, which I suspect is now in its turn due for obsolescence when the next theory that better fits the known facts comes along.

One thing is for sure - Climate Change is infinitely more complex than gravitation.

Worth perusing!

Covid Control - Evidence of Global Military Management

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 15 January 2025; Hits: 6

2025-01-15

It appears that there is evidence that the Covid "pandemic" was staged as (or became) a secret unacknowledged military operation, at least in all NATO countries.

So maybe we were secretly at war with somebody somewhere ... but it was judged expedient not to alert the public.

From the unified response of the anglosphere countries that involved ditching the long-prepared pandemic response plans in favour of measures that had previously been almost universally discredited (lockdown of the fit and able, universal masking, anti-social distancing etc), it was reasonably obvious that something untoward was afoot, although it wasn't at all clear that this was a military operation. Nor is it clear to this day whether that military operation could be in any way justified.

The Brownstone Institute reviews the evidence.

The Climate and Nature Bill

Details: Category: Green; Published: 14 January 2025; Hits: 77

2025-01-14

Shortly to get its second reading in Parliament, this is another Bill to usurp the power of legislation to drive the Climate Change project, removing our essential freedoms, and forcing our obedience to WEF-UN inspired NGOs and assorted other busy-bodies who would compel our compliance "for our safety" - all whilst bypassing the need for further legislation.

Welcome to the New World Climate Emergency Dictatorship.

It's yet another way to tell us that it's all totally democratic because we voted these numskulls into office, so now we must do as they say.

The fact that whichever main party we voted for at summer 2024 General Election we were going to get a government dominated (by whatever means) by the UN-WEF global bureaucracy is neither here nor there - in practical terms we didn't get the choice.

We had to have a referendum before we could leave the clammy embrace of the EU - I submit that the measures being put about to secure Climate Safety are an order of magnitude more significant than leaving of the EU, therefore we must have at least a referendum on these proposals, a mere private members bill slipped through Parliament on the nod is totally inadequate.

We may end up cold, and hungry for some sort of familiar nutritious food (if we have the power to cook it) but we wlll have been "saved" from a massive temperature rise (of 1.5^oC) - according to "our" politicians that all somehow seem to agree with the UN-WEF partnership.

(21 minutes)

(Yes, I know this guy is party political, but at least his party does seem to be well-grounded in logic and evidence)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Once you have sampled some the inevitable verbiage, you may wish to review Words Matter, or Word Matters; it's a Humpty Dumpty world at heart these days.

See also: "The Path to Net Zero" - a report by the Climate Assembly UK. You can argue that they are somehow "representative" of the people, but they are not democratic representatives, they are more aptly described as a focus group - in the UK, last I heard, we use elections to choose our representatives.

The danger that unrepresentative groups such as Climate Assembly UK and the UN's bodies such as the IPCC will be used by ministers and courts to enforce unpopular measures inferred but not specified under the provisions of the Climate and Nature Bill should be recognised. That would be the equivalent of handing carte blanche to powers external to the UK, a situation that has already been tested through our now terminated membership of the EU, and found wanting.

Note: Lastly, even the Climate Catastrophists recognise that the authoritarian path to "climate safety" isn't necessarily the most appropriate route to take.

Fulford Report - Monday 13 January 2025 - War in LA?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 13 January 2025; Hits: 38

2025-01-13

Of course the prime focus this week is on the fires in LA - the similarities with the fires in Maui at Lahaina being noted.

The difference of course is that the victims in Maui were not from the affluent classes, so maybe the motivations were more complex ...

An informative article this week, as usual covering multiple topics.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

The Covid Jabs Evidence of Harms Explained in Comprehensible Bites

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 12 January 2025; Hits: 54

2025-01-12

This site has maintained that the Covid "pandemic" was a hoax from beginning to end.

Why? Because "they" went to absurd lengths to fix the statistics to make it appear so. If there was a real pandemic, why the need?

Dr Yeadon even believes that the whole "science" of virology is unproven, which would set the cat amongst the pigeons big time. I don't go as far as to assert that, since I don't have the evidence, but I suspect that he's right ...

There is so much apparently wrong with the Covid jabs that we might feel non-plussed about where to start.

Dr Mike Yeadon (whom I have followed since 2020) has done a lot of good work in this area, and you can find his substack here.

James Roguski has also set up a series of recent articles which address the evidence of the harms on his substack here - a nice list of topics to peruse, all handily in one place, plus a mine of relevant information, just don't try to absorb it all at once!

(41 minutes)

Feel free to dip in and read as often or whenever you wish.

There are many others, but how much time do you have?

Lastly, some believe that the pandemic was a ruse to commit heinous crime - I say this to indicate that greater legal minds than mine believe this to be so, and have reported their accusations with evidence to the police.

This case covers much common ground with Mark Sexton's case that was also submitted to the police for investigation. To my knowledge neither case has yet come to anything although they were linked to ensure that each has a full set of evidence. The long grass is clearly working overtime now.

Page 1 of 185