Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Ukraine - Russian Offensive on Kiev

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 68

2026-06-02

The war in Ukraine is heating up.

(55 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

(24 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Is Government a Narcissistic Institution?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 373

2026-06-02

"First, you need to understand DARVO — because It’s happening to you right now"

"DARVO: Deny Attack Reverse Victim and Offender"

Parliament

Well - if we don't like the government, we can vote them out of office - so it's our fault.

Well, no we can't. The candidates at election time are almost invariably selected by the political parties, and then controlled in how they vote by those same political parties. They are not our representatives, they are the political party's representatives.

And when all the political parties somehow support the nonsense (eg:"the green agenda" or "sustainable development") of the oligarchical would-be global government, how do we the electorate avoid these financial sink-holes?

Whilst independent candidates can and do stand, they cannot afford to match the spending of the political parties, who only let us vote so that they can blame us for the results ...

Are we being gaslit?

NHS

It's free (except when it's not).

It's beholden to the government (who appoint the regulatory authorities and pass laws to protect them from competition), not to us the customers.

The customers have become the supplicants. Good luck trying to get redress for inadequate care from any such agency.

The government determines who supplies these agencies and who can work for them.

The government controls (or neglects) whether they provide value for money or effective service.

We pay for it all via taxation regardless of usage, thus overall it is a long long way from being "free". Indeed, governments are notorious for "throwing money" at "our NHS" in futile attempts to improve its outcomes.

The Free Press and Media

Lots of choice here, but frantic attempts to control social media content through ill-defined labels such a "hate speech" and poorly-drafted laws through which financial penalties may be imposed on "social media" companies who permit "legal but hateful" content ...

Result: self-censorship. 

So the government gets the censorship it wants but blames others for it.

One could go on (and on) and I'm sure there are plenty of other examples from public life which our readers may point up for themselves, but the principle is demonstrated.

 

The End Times Incoming? Fulford Report Monday 1st June 2026

Details
Category: Conspiracy
Hits: 518

2026-06-01

As we now know, almost nothing is as it seems.

I can't say that I know any better, or that Ben Fulford knows any better, or that the end of this total confusion will actually arrive any time soon, but there's an air of finality about his report this week that hopefully may indicate that "the end is nigh" - to borrow a phase from the religious placard-wavers of humorous cartoons of earlier, less frantic times.

In truth it's getting hard to see how the total confusion over the implications of actual and imagined world events, and the realignment of global commercial financial and military geopolitics, can continue without some clarity emerging at some point from the welter of competing reports.

Ben may not be 100% correct but he's probably one of the best-informed reporters around, and - well, maybe we shouldn't forget that according to some, "we're watching a movie".

Let us hope so. (Modest subscription required for full access)

 

What's Up With Virology?

Details
Category: Conspiracy
Hits: 409

2026-06-01

Now listen up, this is important.

It's not what you think - or rather, it's all about what you think - subconsciously.

Words are the medium through which communication occurs.

But words come freighted with as many assumptions as meanings, and assumptions are treacherous, especially when not overtly stated. When we argue a topic on shared assumptions, we are unlikely to find much disagreement, but a proper argument about a topic should uncover our conflicting assumptions, or it must fail.

The objective of propaganda is to instil in the general populace certain desired assumptions about a particular topic through endless repetition until the association is firmly wedged into our subconscious.

"Russia Bad - Ukraine Good"

"Left Good - Right Bad" (who even knows what "Left" and "Right" mean anymore?)

"Communist Bad - Fascist Bad" (square this with the previous if you can)

"The NHS - Free at the Point of Use" = "The NHS - Hugely Expensive at Point of Taxation"

Oh good - it's all free! Yippee! 

But how about:

"The NHS - (free) Sales Force for Big Pharma" (but go elsewhere otherwise and pay the tax anyway)

Not looking quite so good now is it?

So is the NHS there to serve the people (customers), or to serve the interests of Big Pharma (suppliers)? 

I'd say it's "two - nil" to Big Pharma - so far ...

But bearing in mind that getting value for money is also taken out of the hands of the people and given to the government, and that it's actually illegal to claim a cure for the Big Pharma money-spinner (cancer) even if you can substantiate such a claim :

Maybe "four - nil".

Sorcery - the casting of spells - is not rocket science - it depends upon precisely this inculcation of erroneous (or untrue overall) assumptions within the minds of the people. 

But there's more ...

Was it all foretold in the Bible ...?

Revelation 18-23 "All Nations were deceived by your φαρμακεiα"
('pharmakeia' in Greek = 'sorcerer' in English!)

Go figure.

 

Professor Angus Dalgleish Speaks on Covid

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 396

2026-06-01

Regular readers will be aware that this site believes (but as always cannot prove beyond all doubt) that the Covid pandemic was a scam.

Nevertheless there is a vast body of opinion that still respects "the Science" and believes that there was a Covid-19 virus (complete with "spike protein") that had to be countered.

Professor Angus Dalgleish explains his view of the conventional "Science" of mRNA "vaccination".

" ... they call it 'long covid' but it actually occurred after the vaccine ... "

Make of this what you will.

I already did, although that was before Prof Dalgleish had his views published.  Let us hope and pray that this video helps others to recognise the ghastly truth.

Also - follow the money ...

(76 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Page 9 of 410