2024-03-16
Undoubtedly - but which "Old" and which "New"?
And will the "New" be an improvement on the disappearing "Old"?
And importantly, who is to judge?
I would also ask - did the "Old" actually exist? (Or did we merely perceive it to exist?)
Many people today are having their perceptions shaken, on a scale from "not a lot" to "OMG!", to the extent that if we could, it might be useful to be able to grade the upset level on some sort of measurable scale, much like the Richter scale is used to indicate the force of an earthquake.
And "earthquake" is an appropriate metaphor for occasions when our whole world-view is being inexorably revealed to be substantially the reverse of the truth.
What we previously perceived was what "those behind the curtain" wished us to perceive, whereas what we are now beginning to perceive is the motivations revealed by the actions of the rich and powerful, actions which clearly point the finger both at their true motivations and at "those behind the curtain".
So far we can deduce with some clarity that whereas we believed in our innocence that the world was run by governments elected by the people to look after the people, we can now see that in fact the world has been run by clandestine interests (central bankers, intelligence agencies, secret societies, and who knows who or what else) in the interests of a global criminal mafia (no names, no pack drill!) whose interests include (as a minimum) global domination, population reduction, and imprisonment / enslavement of the survivors.
Ridiculous?
Our perception of ridiculousness depends upon our motivation. Mao, Pol Pot, etc seem ridiculous to us only because their motivations were so different to ours.
But remember, we are only just starting on this journey, and we don't (will we ever?) know where it will end ... so keep an open mind, distrust all authorities and experts, and keep your own counsel.
And watch this video!
(30 minutes)
