Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
Our World, and How to Leave It
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 90
2024-03-14
Our world has seemed to be run by those who manipulate the money supply in order to impoverish the poor and enrich the rich. The scam is run on long timescales, typically longer than the average lifetime, possibly longer than many lifetimes ... thus providing a degree of protection from the intelligent human who never experiences the full progression until his old age, at which point he/she is typically retired and feeling too old to do anything about it.
In this interview, Michael O'Bernicia tells the story of how he came to not only discover and analyse the age-old scam, but also to devise and implement the antidote that he suggests will put an end to it.
In some ways the Universal Community Trust has similarities to Michael Tellinger's One Small Town initiative, being global in focus and proposing an alternative to the banking system.
Will it work? That my friends is for us to judge, by either taking it up, or by rejecting it.
(71 minutes)
A Spanner in the Greenworks?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 77
2024-03-12
More from Net Zero Watch - or, to dig a little deeper, from the Royal Society, no less.
They have uncovered a problem with the modelling of methods to deal with the intermittency of "renewables". Yes, it's odd that isn't it? But it's becoming almost routine rather than unprecedented to find problems with "the modelling" these days.
I suspect that because modelling is (or can be) rather complex, the public has a tendency to consider it something that scientists do and it must therefore be "scientific" - but that is an error. It might reflect science if done well, or it might just reflect the prejudice and/or error of the modeller. And if the modeller is modelling something that isn't fully understood in the first place, well ... the result isn't likely to be very close to useful.
In this case, they apparently based the model on a minimal real-world climate/weather dataset for a single year, assuming that all other years would be similar - an error that would be unworthy of an undergraduate, let alone a senior government department charged with steering the nation's energy policy into the uncharted waters of Net Zero.
Where was their quality control?
Still, you would think that some of the report's recipients might have noticed that something was adrift, but perhaps Sir Humphrey was elsewhere that day.
(7 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Is This the Future of the World Wide Web?
- Details
- Category: Lucky Dip
- Hits: 155
2024-03-11
Is this another Great British initiative that will lead the world? Or perhaps at least our understanding of it?
"This is insane"
It's also mind-bendingly fascinating. Is this going to make the plans of the WEF for man-machine integration completely obsolete?
Prepare to be baffled ...
(15 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
If You Are Still Hesitating to Give Your Kid the Shot ...
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 76
2024-03-09
It's been a while now since Covid hit the world, so if you are in the minority who still wonder whether you shouldn't just get on with it and take your child to the medics to get the protection on offer, then this quick read is for you!
Freedom of Choice? Of Course Sir, Tory Labour or LibDem?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 87
2024-03-08
I suspect, I hope, I have faith that political life in this country is growing up.
In many places now we see the stirrings of disillusion, the crumbling of the assumption so assiduously cultivated until now, that having a choice of political parties at elections equates to freedom of choice.
What matters to the man on the Clapham Omnibus is not the colour of the party in power, but whether its policies are to the overall benefit of the people. We see now more clearly than perhaps ever before that on the policies that matter to the WEF, all major parties are at one with the monarchy.
There was a time when Parliament was happy to project the views of the people to the monarch and act as a restraint upon the monarch's power - Charles I took the fall in 17th century to achieve that status quo, yet here we are in the twenty first century with Charles III in close cahoots with the WEF corporate global oligarchs, and a supine Parliament in full lockstep with him. Mysteriously, no major political party sees any future in opposing the WEF - "why not?" is the question that should be on everybody's lips.
It's not as though the WEF's ideas are inconsequential - they are actually provoking outright revolt right the way across Europe. Farming is incomprehensibly being attacked as never before - you would think that at least the French should have known better!
Wars were fought in the 20th Century "for freedom", but increasingly it seems that they were fought only in the name of freedom.
Today we have elections in the name of freedom, but increasingly that freedom is freedom only to choose those ways that are demanded by the WEF.
The election of George Galloway in Rochdale may or may not represent the start of a sea-change in voter attitudes, but in truth it's probably too soon yet to expect major upset to the fortunes of the parties of the WEF at the next general election.
The party system is very deeply embedded, and very deeply controlling by nature. It is hedged about and supported by the Electoral Commission whose job is not and never could be to reform the current system, but to perpetuate it. The party system is also entirely dependent upon incorruptible MPs - sadly history (Cyril Smith et al) shows MPs to be susceptible to corruption.
We need to think outside the box.
Somehow the power over the political parties must be removed from their rich donors (and maybe others) and returned to the people, or the political party system itself must be discarded altogether.
After all, an MP is supposed to represent the constituency, and should therefore simply be fed and watered, hired and fired, by the constituency. What else do we need?
What if the Electoral Commission were to be abolished, and each constituency would set its own rules for sending its representative to Parliament? That would prompt a debate at local level and get everybody involved like never before!
"Chaos!" I hear you cry - yet out of that chaos would come a multitude of different ideas whose results would inform a proper debate for those constituencies that wanted one.
If we the people want a bottom-up system rather than a top-down dictatorship, then we will have to roll up our sleeves and make it happen.
- WEF: Wildly Expensive Failure
- When Technocrats Sunk Their Claws Into President Donald Trump And He Rolled Over
- George Galloway the Unmentionable - But Not Unelectable!
- Deep State on the Run? Fulford on Monday 4 March 2024
- NATO's War on Russia, Germany Spills the Beans
- Parliament Debates Excess Deaths, Heart Disease (But not Cancer etc)
- Ukraine - Deal or No Deal?
- Global Radiation Emergent - The Low-Down
- Is There Light at the End of the Regulatory Tunnel Vision?
- Global Radiation Emergency
Page 11 of 123