Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Are You a Suitable Case for Treatment?

Details
Category: Health
Hits: 386

2026-04-04

This follows on from Questions for the Medic Who Claims that You are a Suitable Case for Treatment.

"Once you see how the vocabulary operates, you will start noticing it everywhere — in your doctor’s office, in news reports, in the diagnosis you or someone you love may have already received"

Truly the spells under which we labour are all in the words used - words that presuppose notions that "they' want us to believe but of which we should be very wary. 

Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean that they're not out to get you!

Four more topic-specific notions of which to be aware:

 

Questions for the Medic Who Claims that You are a Suitable Case for Treatment

Details
Category: Health
Hits: 293

2026-04-02

Following on from our recent article Could You Put Assumed Authority in its Rightful Place? which might help to deal with an unlawful legal challenge, there is scope for some companion article along the lines of "Could You Challenge your Medical Treatment Plan?". Most people (myself included prior to 2000) simply assume that "doctor knows best", but is that true?

It has always been problematic to me that it is illegal for anybody (except our NHS of course) to claim that they can cure cancer. How then is a cure to be found? Only by contributing to cancer research charities, who have been researching fruitlessly for my entire lifetime - perhaps if they had started looking elsewhere than in our wallets they might have had more success.

Then I developed urticaria and subsequently asthma. To be met with prescriptions for steroids /  inhalers that suppressed the symptoms (for a year or two) but didn't cure. I changed my diet and it all became manageable again (and I lost a lot of weight!).

Then I fell downstairs in the night (Doh!) and woke up to be taken into A&E for ... a long and miserable night of waiting for various investigations, none of which turned anything up - except the MRI scan that I was told found a "nodule" somewhere inside my head. Several years and several MRI scans later I was told it was time for surgery to remove it. After a written risk assessment (that was far from reassuring) I demurred, and after another year and another MRI I was told that it would be quite all right to leave it for a while longer ... continuity of staff didn't seem to be their strong point.

Then Covid arrived, I withdrew from the specialist's "care", subsequently concluded that Covid was a heinous scam, and later started this website.

If they would lie to us about Covid, what would they not lie about?

Now I admit that this is my personal opinion, but it's grounded on personal experience and knowledge of pre-Covid pandemic preparedness that was all thrown out of the window without explanation in 2019/2020 (I also had an excellent Statistics lecturer at College so I knew enough to follow the published numbers, which didn't add up).

So we (in my jaundiced view) need some elementary questions that could and should be asked when somebody says that we are a suitable case for treatment ...

1) Beware of the Test. No test is perfect. Ask what percentage of false positives and false negative results arise? If they can't tell you, or if both together exceed 5% of total tests, then it isn't statistically speaking a reliable test. One in twenty wrong answers is statistically regarded as borderline reliable.
No percentages of false results were ever published for the Covid tests, so how could anybody place any reliance on the results?

2) Beware of the scans. Ask to see the results. If you cannot clearly discern the problematic part of the scan with your own eyes after they have explained it to you, then nor can they.

3) Beware of the Treatment. What proportion of treated patients make a full recovery? What are the contra-indications? What are the possible adverse effects (with percentages please!)? Are alternative treatments available either within or without the NHS? What if I take the proffered treatment and it fails (knee/ hip joints especially!)? If they can't tell you then insist or go elsewhere.

You are sure to find some suggestions on YouTube! Don't mock  - I fixed a very painful hip joint in three months by following dietary recommendations from YT, no hip replacement required 😀. (I'm pretty sure that the same would apply to knees).  And there are independent specialists that offer services outside the NHS (but ask them the same questions!).

4) Apply the "So What?" test. So what if I don't take the proffered treatment? If it's not conducive and not urgent then you may have more time to check out alternative measures. 

So for the first in a promised series of similar articles, read

What to Ask Before Your Next PSA Test!

(NB1: the symptoms of radiation poisoning are very similar to the alleged "flu-like" viruses - no space here to elaborate but see our 5G & EMFs menu)

(NB2: there are no physical tests for mental health issues, and for some alleged or borderline issues such as autism, so diagnosis is entirely in the mind of the physician - draw your own conclusions, but ask all the other questions anyway)

This is Not a Conspiracy Theory

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 341

2026-04-03

It's not even a Secret Society, despite the video headline.

Nor is it Party Politics - you don't have to be member to be "influenced" by this society.

Given their openly declared policies of murdering those that they consider useless, one must ask how they got away with advocating such policies, policies that were clearly unchristian in an officially Christian country, and indeed illegal in both Christian and unchristian countries where incitement to murder is an offence (although technically they are not inciting anybody to do anything other than pass ill-advised laws that would have the effect of making what was already a crime legally acceptable - maybe that should be a crime too, although it's unclear whether MPs' activities in Parliament can be prosecuted in the Courts). 

But one does have to ask whether this Society itself is as deep as it goes, or whether there are other hidden hands that guide it to implement such policies on behalf of hitherto unknown / unsuspected entities which do operate in secret. Worth investigating, in my view.

But it's your view that counts ...

(29 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

What Changed in 1901 America?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 274

2026-04-03

"He contended that the concentration of land ownership was the primary mechanism by which wealth extracted from productive labour accumulated in the hands of those who produced nothing"

Our readers who follow investment matters may recognise association with the 18½ year Real Estate Cycle which links the rise in real estate values with preceding investments in infrastructure. This link was recognised by 1879 when "Henry George published 'Progress and Poverty', an examination of why economic depressions occurred and why poverty persisted alongside industrial growth" 

For some reason the Education Curriculum taught in American schools prior to 1901 was changed to exclude not only this information ... but how the problem might be avoided by a change to shift the burden of taxation to those who had actually accumulated the wealth to pay it.

No doubt that too might have produced unforeseen and undesirable anomalies, but that's an argument for another day ...

(17 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

The Self-Sustaining Bureaucracy

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 281

2026-04-03

"Analyses of administrative expansion, technocratic governance, and the erosion of public trust have converged toward a common diagnosis: institutions continue to function, yet their capacity to respond meaningfully to criticism appears to be weakening"

"Closure: a structural state in which institutions maintain the forms of responsiveness while losing the substance of correction"

I feel that Martin Geddes might agree. 

"This condition is not exceptional. It is increasingly observable across a range of Western institutions, including universities, regulatory bodies, and public administrations, where procedural activity coexists with a growing inability to adjust to feedback"

This problem may not be confined to the UK ... 

"The final stage of the process is cognitive closure. At this point, the issue is no longer the attenuation of feedback, but the transformation of how institutions interpret reality itself"

 

Page 6 of 381