Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Unavoidably Unsafe

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 51

2026-06-09

Vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. Legally.

OK, so it's like crossing the road, right? You might get run down by a car or a lorry or an omnibus, but that's pretty rare and we live with that kind of unsafe all the time.

Well, no.

We have pedestrian crossings for crossing the road, and traffic in busy places is stopped by traffic lights or school crossing patrols so that we can cross safely. And if somebody does run us over, they can be prosecuted for dangerous driving, running a red light, and we can sue them for damages.

For vaccines, in place of pedestrian crossings we have "informed consent" - the risks have to be honestly explained to us before we agree to take the jab, and if we don't like those risks then the jab can be refused.

When was the last time a medical person did that for you? Told you that vaccines are "unavoidably unsafe" and spelled out the risks?

Infinitely more likely they just intoned that the jab was "safe and effective" without explaining that it was safe for the pharmaceutical company but not necessarily for the patient, and effective at swelling the company's profits (and our tax bill) but not necessarily for defending the patient against catching the disease or defending our health if we do. 

Oh, and if we do have any unfortunate (but rare!) adverse event then we cannot sue the pharmaceutical company as we might sue a motorist, we have to claim under a bureaucratic government compensation scheme that will take forever, require copious paperwork, and is unlikely to provide compensation adequate to the injury as the costs to the public purse must be minimised. Meanwhile the pharmaceutical company suffers no adverse effect whatever.

Add to that the fact that these "rare" adverse events may take a long time to both become apparent and be conclusively linked back to the jab (even if that were possible, unlike the effects of a road accident) and we can see that no, it's not at all like crossing the road.

 

Nothing Happens Until Everything Happens

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 46

2026-06-09

An unexpected reverie from Martin Geddes, now revisiting his earlier direction when he analysed the Q phenomenon in the United States.

Times have moved on since then, but the Q aftermath has yet to play out, and it has taken much longer than at first we believed ...  will it play out at all?

I have a conviction that he is voicing the thoughts of a great many people around the world today, a far greater number than perhaps he reached back in the day. People who still maintain their faith in the future, however long it may take.

 

Appleby Horse Fair - Looking Back in Clarity

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 42

2026-06-09

Appleby Horse Fair is by now indelibly imprinted upon my mind, so many articles by Martin Geddes have flowed from it.

Now Martin has produced a single narrative to tell the story, and of course you can read it here.

Perhaps it marks the end of that chapter, perhaps it doesn't, but it's certainly a milestone of sorts.

Enjoy.

 

World in Flux - Fulford Report Monday 8 June 2026

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 145

2026-06-08

Ben reports that (finally!) the gloves are off and the KM is being hunted down in North America.

And elsewhere - cleaning a single country isn't going to cut it.

It's a long report this week, so dive in. (Modest subscription required for full access)

 

The Root of the Problem Police Force

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 62

2026-06-08

Henry Nowak. I'm sure he never wanted to be the focus of such attention.

Clive Pinder writing for the Daily Sceptic blames the Tories - and not just the Party but also the habitual Tory voters who didn't correct the errant ways of their party.

But it's not that simple, it never is.

The voters'role in our Parliamentary "democracy" is to vote their Party into "power", not to shape their policies or hold their MPs to account - that's the job of the Whips' office.

" ... I ... watched the model being built from the inside ... I was not wrong about the model. I was wrong about the culture it would have to operate in ... "

And who built that culture? Who "educated" virtually the whole public establishment in the ethos that they should follow in the future? It's clear that the intention was to reframe the outdated notion of public service into something else entirely, not just in specific areas, but right across the board. 

And who gave them all the necessary contracts?

 

Page 4 of 410