
Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
Eventually, the Truth Becomes Obvious
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 37
2025-11-10
So, heads must roll.
Heads have been duly sentenced to roll ... but not yet.
After all, this is the BBC.
We must have a proper handover, otherwise the poor benighted staffers wouldn't have a clue what to do without somebody to tell them!
Really?
Isn't that exact attitude part of the problem?
What parts of "truthful" "accurate" "balanced" and "unbiased" do the staff at the BBC not understand?
To which we might add "clearly distinguish fact from opinion" and "quote sources".
I'd wager that there's more than a few who would be delighted to be allowed to get on with the job without interference from what has hitherto passed for "leadership".
It's not rocket science. Those that don't "get it" should all go, and go now. Cancel the licence fee, stop the money, clear the decks. There are others who will fill the void without need for financial subsidy, who pay their way by charging for their services. At least that way we the customers can stop our part of their funding as we see fit, no questions asked, no hand-wringing, no pontificating, no parliamentary huffing and puffing, no long-drawn enquiry to "find out what went wrong" and "identify lessons learned".
We know what went wrong - they falsified their reporting. Deliberately. In any public service media organisation, that has to be a capital offence.
It may well also be a criminal offence, or may involve civil offence such as slander or libel.
Did China Steal Rachel Reeve's Black Hole?
- Details
- Category: Unelected
- Hits: 34
2025-11-09
OK, it's a tongue in cheek question, but the CCP does reportedly have a financial black hole to worry about.
Still, maybe they can blame President Xi ...
(42 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Is There Such a Thing as a Noble Lie?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 50
2025-11-09
Bearing in mind the old adage of "how can we tell when politicians are lying?" - "when we see their lips move", perhaps in this day and age politics has become so unencumbered by truth that this question has no further relevance.
Nevertheless politicians as a class (with noble but limited exceptions) still seem to believe that lying to us plebs is nothing they should be ashamed of. It's routine. Indeed it's fundamental to the way that elected government is run - they tell us that they represent us, their constituents, in Parliament, when in truth they represent those shadowy figures who control the political parties (and possibly also the Civil Service) behind the scenes by means fair or foul. They just don't talk about it.
In the case of America, one could be forgiven for thinking that "behind the scenes" turns out to be the Israeli lobby, without whose financial support it seems impossible to get elected.
The UK polity may also be encumbered by a similar if rather less overt influence - we were even instrumental in the establishment of the State of Israel way back when, at the instigation of Lord Rothschild. Whether that influence still pertains may be something that we should all think about.
Still, I digress. (NB in this case, "Open Society" means what it says, it does not reference George Soros)
Free Reiner Fuellmich - Lawyer for Covid Truth - "Political Prisoner"
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 54
2025-11-09
Reiner is a German lawyer, licensed to practise in California, the original co-founder and the drive behind the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany that did so much work to expose the circumstances behind the Covid "pandemic", work which was brought to a head with a public on-line Grand Jury trial AKA the Covid Court of Public Opinion.
I'm sure that he would agree that this was a mammoth but necessary undertaking to expose the multiple frauds upon which "the pandemic" rested. If it's not covered by the Committee's work, then it's not relevant.
Following this he was detained (some might say kidnapped) in Mexico when he went there to renew his passport, and was extradited to Germany for trial, not on the grounds of his work noted above, but on the grounds of inappropriate financial activity in the conduct of the investigative committee.
Many believe that this trial was not untainted by bias.
He was found guilty and sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
Why Democratic Government Guarantees Failure
- Details
- Category: Greater Reset!
- Hits: 42
2025-11-08
Is good government more about checks and balances, or cheques and balances?
There's a good case to be made that neither are properly working features of our British Governments of recent decades, with results that Nick Hubble points up very clearly in the latest offering from Investors Daily.
And yet ... am I right to suspect that such arguments, whilst admirably correct, are simply the symptoms of a deeper malaise/design defect that afflicts our seats of power: the propensity to dishonesty that results from (a) lack of basic integrity, and (b) lack of fear of being found out, and yes (c) lack of any fear of the consequences of being found out.
The "revolving door" between regulators and the regulated corporates is now so well understood that I don't have to explain it here ...
The inability of any elected government to sack non-performing civil servants is legendary.
There is little personal linkage between cause and repercussion within the Palace of Westminster Yes Minister.
And if there were, the trail always goes cold at the point where policy implementation is outsourced to private enterprise (commercial confidentiality is sacrosanct don'cha know.).
The fate of politicians who carry the electoral can for failed policy implementation by the civil service and its corporate cronies is also well understood. So is accountability broken.
And the role of the media in turning a blind eye (where the interests of its corporate owners and advertisers is concerned) is also beginning to be more widely understood. Fearless champions of truth and integrity they are not.
So if we were to be brave enough to take our cue from the original American ideal of "government of the people by the people and for the people" literally, how might we redesign our government from first principles in compliance with that ideal?
- Deep Dive on Charlie Kirk
- Graham Moore Reports on His Legal Action to Make Election Count Procedures More Secure
- Neil Oliver, Tom Luongo Discuss the World
- NATO, Europe are Cooked?
- What to Say to Our Younger Selves of Today?
- Mystery of Operation Talla
- Mystery of the Fate of Great Britain
- Another Can of Historical Worms?
- The Last Word on 3I/Atlas?
- Russia Moves to Close the Ukraine Battlefield?
Page 2 of 315

