Censorship

2026-10-02

One might be forgiven for asking a number of pertinent questions about this civil lawsuit, such as why it's a civil suit and not a criminal prosecution?

Perhaps the clue is in here somewhere:

"Plaintiff brings this action exclusively under the laws of the State of Florida... Plaintiff only brings claims as the head of the Department of Legal Affairs under FDUTPA"

Still, it's a step forward rather than backward, and as the burden of proof is a little lower in a civil court it may have more chance of success?

Step into the quagmire here.

2026-10-01

Inappropriate mood music?

Everything is significant.

But only the Chinese can decide...

(16 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2026-10-01

IVF.Saviour of the childless? Or "snake oil"selling for vast profits?

Professor the Lord Robert Winston.

(93 minutes) (If you don't have 93 mins 🙂)

Like / Dislike this video

2026-09-30

Andy and Rich Review.

Make of it what you will.

(15 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

(35 minutes)

Where is the Power-Play Heading?

2026-09-26

"Safe and Effective". Oh good, no worries, it will protect us.

"The sentence does not say “no evidence of a link.” It says the evidence is not sufficient to decide either way."

"Inherently Unsafe".Thereforewe cannot sue the manufacturer, we can only apply to the government for "compensation". The government can afford bigger lawyers than we can.

You pays your money (in taxes) and you takes your choice (in life). 

But is this playing field actually levelled properly?

There is no prize on offer for a correct answer to the

2026-09-26

DMSO is not a wonder drug. It's a solvent made from wood.

And yet...   it turns out according to many that it may be useful to address health problems that mainstream medicine does not.

And it's inexpensive (provided we don't all rush out to buy it at once).

So what's not to like? 

In many cases, whilst showing promise, it's a bit experimental in terms of dosage and the best way to apply/ingest it. 

On the other hand it does of itself seem to be very safe, even if (in common with much else) it may be painful if you get it in your eyes for example. 

And like castor oil, it's penetrative when applied topically, so may be used to "carry" other medications into the tissues concerned.

2026-09-24

In my day it was normal to have measles. Not especially pleasant, but normal. Just a childhood rite of passage, like chicken pox.

In fact, I was asthmatic prior to catching it, and for most purposes not asthmatic afterwards. Although prolonged exertion would still make me breathless, it actually seemed to improve my health.

Walking the 30 mile Tanners Marathon (Leith Hill, Ranmoor Common and all) within 10 hours became a regular annual feat.

As a student I even joined the local TA. 

So I don't buy the "measles is deadly" tale whatsoever. Of course if you are in poor health anyway and your immune system is in bad shape then almost anything may become serious. But I never heard of anybody I knew dying of measles.

"The 1963 campaign was not protecting American children against a lethal disease. The disease had stopped being lethal a generation

2026-09-24

The perils of modern living lurk inside every household appliance these days.

The examples are from foreign climes but who's to say that these pitfalls may not lurk here in the UK also?

It may not be simply our phone, our smart TV or our wifi that we need to consider may pick up on our human foibles...
... anything "smart" (whether or not so labelled) may do.

2026-09-24

The perils of modern living lurk inside every household appliance these days.

The examples are from foreign climes but who's to say that these pitfalls may not lurk here in the UK also?

It may not be simply our phone, our smart TV or our wifi that we need to consider may pick up on our human foibles...
... anything "smart" (whether or not so labelled) may do.

2026-09-24

Probably the title that by now near enough everybody can get behind.

Rich and guests "Burning Bright" and Jim Torma review the Trump performance at the UN (and Carney's performance in Canada).

Trump's version of self-censorship seems to be to make so many contradictory statements and assertions that nobody knows what he really does. At least It makes a change from the heavy-handed censorship of the media.

(33 minutes)

Like / dislike this video here.

2026-09-23

Can institutions (and governments) be designed to be responsive to the need for correction?

It's a problem when a faceless institution (or government) effectively hides behind the internet (and nowadays behind an AI or three) - when "computer says 'no' ", what to do? Whom to call? How long have you got?

The scope for diversion, for sending you around loops that somehow omit the one question that would let you exit the loop, is enormous.

The answer of course is not to deal with such outfits, but when that outfit is effectively (even if not legally) a part of the government, or is a monopoly (gas, water or electricity board billing company) then you may have to simply do as you are told if you want heat, light, and cooking facility. Or fight your way through the courts...or somehow go off-grid and hope to be left alone.

Not before time, concerned folk are giving the problem of institutional imperviance

2026-09-23

Well known pandemic dissidents are losing patience that the Trump regime will ever do anything to reverse the Covid narrative, expose the mRNA shots for the biological weapons of destruction that  they are, and indeed get on with the Epstein miscreants (starting with all those in public office) and the whole public take down of the deep state.

And that it seems to me is the crux of it - once that threshold is crossed there's no going back, indeed the only sensible option is to press forward at full speed with arrests and all the associated works - it's the argument that cannot be lost and further shilly-shallying will not cut it.

So getting public opinion onside before taking that step looks like an essential prerequisite.

And perhaps the public's reaction to this move by the Covid dissenters will be enough to persuade the authorities that the time has come?

We know what to do -

2026-09-22

As if we needed any further examples of the total and utter inadequacy of significant parts (if not necessarily the whole) of  "our NHS", along comes the Thirlwall inquiry to draw completely the wrong conclusions.

Christopher Morris reports for the Daily Sceptic.

2026-09-21

According to the schedule, every newborn is born deficient and requires an injection.

An injection that differs by Anglosphere country.

Informed consent is honoured more in the breach than in the observance.

"Every current package insert opens with a boxed warning against the exact route of administration hospitals universally use"

Read the insert first.

2026-09-21

Plotkin. The name that every proponent of vaccines should know.

Aaron Siri. The lawyer who had the sheer brass face to depose him legally.

Those of us unfamiliar with this story need to read this, and follow the link to the full deposition (yes it's nine hours) if you have the time.

"Safe and effective" or "Inherently unsafe"? 

It's your view that counts.

2026-09-21

The Monroe Doctrine.

Or the Donroe Doctrine?

Is this where the world is headed?

In past centuries the world was divided up by the competing colonial powers. America was a series of colonies of the British, the French, the Spanish, the Portuguese. Oh, and the Danes in Greenland.

By various means the British won out, still retaining Canada under the British Crown, which also facilitated the State of Israel. The Middle East has been a hotbed of violence ever since, much of it under overt American and Israeli oversight. But the British and Americans always had that carefully ill-defined "special relationship", and Israel always exerted a heavy but thinly disguised influence on American politics, so who was really pulling influence behind the scenes?

But the Donald (together with Russia and China) is reshaping the world away from the old

2026-09-20

No-one has consented this...

... but they've got to go somewhere...

... well how about they go back to where they shouldn't have come from? 

The British public have consistently voted against these high levels of immigration for many years, and the government is out of order for continuing to accept all illegal migrants that the French and British effectively conspire to escort across the Channel, and for failing to fulfil their many past promises to "stop the boats".  

Simple really... or is it?

(34 minutes)