Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   


It was either going to be the New World Top-Down Order of the Blair - Cameron - May - Boris - Bush - Obama - Clintons - Kissinger - Schwab - Rockefellers - Rothschilds brigade of Khazarian Zionists and Eugenicists, or it would be the opposite, an expertly crafted and skilfully engineered demolition, on behalf of the freedom of the people, of the centralized power structures of those self-appointed global elites who thought that they would rule the world - AKA the global corporate oligarchs (Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group, World Economic Forum (now "in partnership" with the United Nations) the list goes on ... ).

How were these centralized power structures built in a world of democratic governments? By ancient secret societies and modern secret services of the world who, whilst nominally under government control, were in practice laws unto themselves, and took full advantage of secrecy to coerce those in government and anybody else in positions of influence (it may be no coincidence that media empires are owned by Israeli nationals) to do their bidding.

It is in fact no secret that the Mossad of Israel, the CIA of the USA,  MI6 and other members of the "Five Eyes" have been working together "for our security" for years. One might almost believe that the Mossad rules the world.

But how could these groupings control elected governments?

By any means legal and lawful, or illegal or unlawful - if they control key authorities in the judicial system and - say - the electoral systems and news media (not to mention financial institutions and politicians of all parties), then all events and individuals could be manipulated, alongside public opinion. 

The repetition of propaganda by the media has a long history, and not just in Nazi Germany.

How could such a manipulation be possible?

Consider a hypothetical example: when Britain was struggling to shadow the Euro via the Exchange Rate Mechanism in the 1990s; how did George Soros manage to short the pound to the extent that he suddenly acquired a vast fortune (becoming known in the process as the "man who broke the Bank of England") when we somehow "fell out" of the ERM on "Black Wednesday" 1992? A fortune which no doubt was subsequently of great benefit to his Open Society Foundations, which went on from strength to strength to influence (some suspect manipulate) various official bodies in Europe and elsewhere?

One may surmise that this could have been done by less than a handful of people in key positions (although I can't comment on that). Who lost out? the taxpayer, the man (or woman) on the Clapham omnibus.

I have no information, but the enquiring mind might well ask whether this was a deliberate manipulation.

So how might the downfall of such a criminal oligarchical cabal be brought about? By bankruptcies (follow the money), and by re-education of the people to reassume control over their own futures in a world of peace.

Who would be in a position to do this? Whilst this is still to be revealed (should a formal reveal ever actually occur), the supposition is that a shadowy grouping of patriots in support of the US Constitution (which the US military is sworn to uphold) might be responsible. Perhaps it takes one clandestine group to stalk and catch another? I note (make of it what you will) that Trump has experience in bankruptcy ... and diplomacy ...

This grouping too is supposedly a long time in the preparation for these last days of the ancien regime. 

As well as sections of the US military, it supposedly also includes the "Q" phenomenon which some think had its origins in US Naval Intelligence (and others think may go right back as far as President Lincoln). Or it might just be another psy-op ...

Clif High (is there anything this man hasn't dabbled in / researched?!) believes that there exists what amounts to a self-organising collective (SOC) of individuals not in any formal organisation (or at least without anything more than a central tiny core of key members as an organised group). It seems to me that this would include (but not be limited to) the followers of "Q" and the associated ANONS on social media that spread the word that the mainstream media will not touch, and indeed that the likes of the BBC's fearless Disinformation Unit do their best to smear and decry as peddlers of mis/dis/malinformation.

But it's also pretty clear that this SOC needs support from high places in order to perform its function of identifying the message and getting it out to the people. It's also clear that it's up to the reader to identify who is part of the SOC and who a part of the anti-SOC - this too is part of the general purpose of re-education of the people - we must learn to make our own judgements rather than to rely on "authorities". For instance, is Elon Musk SOC or Anti-SOC? Many personalities both main-stream and social-media seem to run with feet in both camps at different times ...

As Socrates may have said: "The only thing I know is that I know nothing". As the allegedly Chinese curse is supposed to declaim: "May we live in 'interesting' times" !

But as Jesus is helpfully reported to have said: "by their fruits shall ye know them" (Matthew 7:16-20)

But the most promising news is how the great hoaxes are collapsing under the weight of their own contradictions - 

Nobody wants electric vehicles any more.

My old post war Latin master used to drive a red Morgan three wheeler known affectionately as his "fire engine". EVs are becoming known as such for much more serious reasons, as well as lesser problems such as range anxiety, recharge times and associated connection difficulties, not to mention poor resale values and rising insurance costs. So EVs from China are piling up unsold around the world and motor manufacturers are telling their governments that if they don't delay (= "remove") the ban on fossil fuelled vehicles soon, they won't have any motor manufacturing left.

Not to mention that the "renewables" that are getting "less costly every year" are now so cheap that electricity bills are through the roof in spite of all the subsidies (more scams?).

The Covid scam is finally making Big Pharma very uncomfortable as the news of "adverse events" trickles out past the mainstream media, and people begin to understand the real effects of the jabs - even that some very highly respected people are (holy cow!) questioning whether "viruses" even exist, or whether virology itself is ... might be ... just another scam?

This site has long maintained that given that the Covid pandemic was 100% reliant on an unreliable PCR test that gave a high percentage (always unquantified and unmentioned) of false positive results, that there were no significant levels of excess deaths reported in the statistics until the jabs roll-out began (despite heroic misattribution of all other manner of deaths to Covid on the basis of the fake test); followed by truly heroic attempts to cement the notion of an infectious malignant virus being deliberately created at the Wuhan Institute of Virology by nefarious agencies under Dr Fauci; these latter could have had one specific purpose only - to persuade the people to look at the terrible mad scientists that created this supposed plague (that being faked didn't actually kill anyone), rather than to make the less obvious deduction that the virus was a hoax, and maybe virology itself was a hoax, a hoax designed to feed Big Pharma off our "sicknesses" (AKA "side-effects") for ever?

Still circumstantial, but would you bet against it, and in which direction is the tide of information now flowing?

"Q" has long maintained that "the only way is the military". To do what? To round up the criminals who betrayed the public's trust - politicians, lawyers, police, civil servants, press and media, the list is enormous, and such an operation would be gigantic, unprecedented in all of history.

It would also need to be global in reach, because the crimes were global in nature.

Of course the public would never stand for such an operation if they didn't realise that those being arrested were indeed guilty of high crimes and misdemeanours, such as treason against the people, whose interests they were supposed to serve. Hence the need to show the public, to educate them as to the crimes that had been committed. It needed to be a lived experience with unmistakable impact.

Many of these crimes were very obvious - injecting untested and therefore unsafe experimental medical products into anybody without their fully informed consent has been a globally recognised crime ever since the post-war Nuremberg Trials took place, yet somehow the entire world seemed to overlook this most basic legal principle. To try to inject the whole world in this manner surely qualifies as attempted genocide?

To inject children in like manner who according to the statistics were never at any serious risk from the supposed disease indicates total disregard for health and safety, and criminal culpability of the highest order.

But much water had flowed beneath the bridge (and much propaganda had polluted our press and media) since Nuremberg, and we the people had grown lazy, docile, and confused. We were assaulted by psychological operations generated at the highest levels of government designed specifically to scare us into compliance. The majority who had trusted the authorities to look after their interests were taken by surprise, and lacked a coherent ability to push back.

We needed to be reminded of the law, and to relearn to think matters through for ourselves, before arrests could be successfully accomplished and revealed to the people. To our shame, this has taken four years to date.

But Those speaking out are now gaining traction.

If we haven't been paying attention, perhaps the time to do so is now.