2020-12-05

Some of us have been concerned for many years now that our perfidious Parliament will allow the EAW (European Arrest Warrant) to live on well beyond its Brexit end-by date.

Torquil Dick-Erikson writing for Brexit Watch now discloses the confirmation that as far as HMG is concerned "There is no intention for extradition to any EU jurisdiction after the end of transition period to be made subject to a court ruling that there is a prima facie case".

There you have it. i don't doubt that the EAW will be "renegotiated" post "Brexit" and repackaged to look a little more like a new arrangement, but the fundamentals will remain the same.

So much for Habeas Corpus and our freedom from arrest and imprisonment without trial for prolonged, maybe indefinitely prolonged, periods. We can still be summarily arrested and

2020-12-04

The Drive for the Covid Vaccines

Regardless of what we think about the cause of the peak in April, we are now in December and observing what has every appearance of a normal profile of winter deaths from respiratory infections (covid + flu + rhinovirus etc).

I’m by no means the only one who thinks so.

So a number of pharmaceutical companies have spent a lot of money, as little time as possible, and a huge investment in publicity, to develop and sell a vaccine for Covid.

Let us for the moment be trusting and assume that these vaccines will be both “safe” and

2020-12-04

PHE national Influenza and COVID-19 surveillance report Week 48

Public Health England’s week 48 (up to week 47) report on “flu-like” respiratory infections reveals:

“Cases”

Positive Covidt

"The Donald" Tells the Presidential Election How It Is

2020-12-02

Jonathan Saxty writing for Brexit Watch draws our attention to the differences that the Swiss canton system bestows upon Swiss democracy, as compared to our own system.

He also draws attention to the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) Bill  that "affords police – and other public bodies – the power to forgive crimes committed in the interests of national security, preventing or detecting crime or disorder, and for economic reasons".

For economic reasons???

"The Bill provides

2020-12-02

David Banks writing for Brexit Watch reviews the current state of our "withdrawal" from EU defence initiatives, and finds the usual ambiguity (some might think disparity) about our military relationship with the EU post-"Brexit".

Of course, a military relationship doesn't just cover troop and equipment deployments, it must also cover inter-operability, common specifications, procurement and defence contractors.

If we can't manufacture our own arms and equipment then we will be beholden to the EU for such supplies - which could therefore be withheld in the event of policy differences. In any case, what chance do we think UK defence contractors would have of being chosen by the EU to supply their needs? In the short term they might have little option in specific areas but longer-term contracts could be progressively withheld until our defence industries

2020-12-01

To remind ourselves how we got here, I have linked the speeches delivered by "the Donald" to both the World Economic Forum (a.k.a. "Deep State") and the United Nations (a.k.a. the "Great Unelected" through which some think the "Deep State" is trying on the current Covid coup du monde).

Trump spoke at the UN and the WEF in Davos in both 2018 and 2020:

Trump in Davos 2018:

Like / Dislike this video here.

And at the UN in September:

Like / Dislike this video

12/01/2020

Migration Watch UK recently put out a press release covering the performance of the Home Office in managing inbound illegal immigrants.

No prizes for guessing the overall tenor of the report.

"it is hard to avoid the conclusion that it has neither the capacity nor the capabilities, in particular in respect of criminal investigation and prosecution, required to manage this threat more effectively"

To which one might reasonably add "nor the will".

2020-11-30

The European Centre for Law and Justice exposes funding arrangements for European institutions that should make us all pay attention.

2020-11-29

Following an earlier article in the Mail (only slightly provocatively entitled "What they DON'T tell you about Covid and how the facts can be twisted") the Dept of Health and Social Care took to Twitter to contest the DM's message:

"This article is misleading. This is a global pandemic . . . "  (etc - I'll save you the rest as it's entirely unoriginal)

Haven't they heard that they can just ring up Twitter and get them to brand it as "misleading"?  That way they can avoid any repercussions, such as righteous indignation from many quarters, by deflecting them onto someone else.

Ah well, maybe next time.

As it is the Mail was able to publish a follow-up, ramming home the message from their original article and pointing up the absurdity of the government setting up a tweet that was certain to attract many cogent and indignant replies:

"Sir Graham Brady,

2020-11-29

The AIER publishes a review of the USA's Covid-19 death statistics.

“These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States”

"There have been over 262,000 deaths attributed to Covid-19 in the United States, yet total deaths have not increased in any alarming capacity; they have only mirrored existing trends"

"Deaths have remained relatively constant, yet reported deaths due to deadly conditions such as heart disease have fallen while reported Covid deaths have risen"

Worth reading.

Also worth reading - a

2020-11-29

Anna Brees (ex-BBC) interviews Prof Robert Endres of Imperial College. The professor is a German national and brings an interesting German perspective to what is fundamentally an international problem, both at the medical level and at the political level.

"We are going somewhat back to the dark ages... it is not evidence-based anymore"

. 

Good to see Imperial tolerates a variety of viewpoints.

Anna has asked for this video to be shared, and we are happy to oblige.

2020-11-29

The author, Martin Geddes, is a British Computer Scientist and a rather unusual man.

He has probably spent more time than most in reassessing his views on life and reconstructing a world view based on the evidence as he sees it.

He has trodden a path that very many of us are now having to contemplate, so if you don't fancy starting from scratch, his web-sites offer us a crash course in the re-evaluation of our world.

https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/            https://www.martingedd.es/

I would love to see his analysis on the state of play in the United Kingdom,

2020-11-27

Lockdown Sceptics publishes an article by well qualified authors (including Dr Mike Yeadon) which forensically explains how reliance on the PCR test is producing a "pseudo-epidemic".

"A false positive pseudo-epidemic is a well described phenomenon in the medical literature which results in an exponential rise in diagnosed cases and deaths but no excess deaths. PCR testing is renowned for it and the “second wave” of Swine Flu in 2009 was entirely a false positive pseudo-epidemic only stopped by stopping the testing"

This is the simple key point at issue which fatally undermines the whole government-by-big-pharma covid narrative, and the cogent arguments presented in this article deserve everybody's full attention, especially as we learn today that "end of lockdown" most emphatically does not involve any significant relaxation of

2020-11-26

For those wondering about the state of the US Presidential Election (and who isn't?), this video walks us through the remaining process. It's a fascinating crash summary of the US electoral process alongside the legal manoeuvering.

How will this process play out?

Will it deliver President Biden or President Trump?

The video Is a bit of a ding-dong  between opposing positions, doesn't shy away from any of the legal and real world issues, and does predict an outcome with a good measure of confidence - very interesting (70 minutes):

Well, Youtube strikes again - but you can watch it

2020-11-25

Del Bigtree is a long-time journalist campaigning for vaccine truth, and has been diligently researching who benefits from the proposed mass Covid vaccinations of the world.

This is their report - it names names and names vaccines. Conflicts of interest at the heart of a US medical regulatory authority? Surely not?

This follows on from previous ICAN lawsuits:

Sept 2018: "Stipulated Order Confirming non-Compliance with 42 USC 300AA-27C"

"In 1986 Congress charged Health and Human Services (HHS) with the primary responsibility of ensuring vaccine

2020-11-25

This is an article from the British Medical Journal dated 21st October.

"The ongoing phase III trials for covid-19 vaccines are some of the most consequential randomised trials ever done. In September, following months of campaigning for greater openness, four manufacturers made their full study protocols publicly available. The publications create a rare opportunity for “real time transparency” in which the conduct of clinical trials is opened to public scrutiny while the studies are still under way"

The fact that they feel that this new transparency is so significant I find very revealing - were previous vaccine trials not transparent?

"We may not like what we read, but with real time sharing of full protocols comes an unprecedented space for translating critique into action to improve trial design mid-stream. And there is much to

2020-11-25

First let me get my disclaimer in - I am not legally qualified and I am not offering any legal advice here - you take any action on the basis of videos or links on this page entirely on your own responsibility.

However, this just has to be the most eloquent fast-talking and hilarious "legal advice" that you will ever hear should the time come when your "collar gets felt by the plod". Get your retribution in first - watch it now!

This is not to denigrate the police force of any country - it is simply to state the speaker's straightforward lawyerly opinion. OK, he is an American lawyer, but do you think that this in itself is significant?

Watch (46 minutes of spectacularly fast-talking) and see if you don't agree:

Like / Dislike this video

2020-11-24

It has come to something when an "alternative medicine" site plunges into the world of global politics, but I suppose they are only following the lead of Big Pharma and the WHO. Politics and medicine are now joined at the hip, and have been ever since the politicians decided to "regulate" medical practice and monopolise it in the UK via the NHS. Strange how the denationalisation agenda of earlier Tory governments never extended to medicine.

And this is no cursory survey of the politics, but a full blown analysis of how the global "stakeholders" (mega-corporations of all kinds and their cronies to you and me) set out to overturn the rights of peoples across the world:

"The kicker is Article 29(3), which authorises the UN to suspend or remove ANY right or freedom and presumably due process of law that is contrary to their purposes and principles, which could of course change with the wind, with no mechanisms in place of any kind to check that power, they can simply do with you what they like, when they

2020-11-24

Conservative Woman publishes an article by Timothy Bradshaw that goes through the current shenanigans surrounding our zombie still-on-going-long-after-deadline-death EU future relationship negotiations (excluding military matters which are being handled separately - see our article on the Davis Ellis Report).

Are the omens good, or is Lord Frost just putting a brave face on it? Is Boris following Sun Tsu doctrine - appear weak when you are strong (by firing Dominic Cummins) and strong when you are weak . . ?

We should soon find out - resolution one way or the other is long past overdue.

Oh wait! Some of them have tested