Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

EU's Foundations Crumbling?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 754

09/01/2025

The start of the new year has gone badly for the EU, but can anybody really maintain that this was unforeseen?

The gas supplies from Russia to Germany and by extension to the EU via the Ukraine has been turned off. It doesn't matter whom you blame for this, what matters is that this has turned off the EU's ability to maintain its (ever declining) standard of living.

Energy is the lifeblood of industry, and Germany's seemingly unstoppable post war industrialisation has suddenly - well, truly not so suddenly - ground to a deathly silence of shuttered factories and closed shops.

To say that this could not have been foreseen is risible - the war in the Ukraine (with Germany's largest supplier of low-cost energy!) was not exactly likely to turn in their favour when push came to shove. The writing has thus been on the wall since 2014, when the Ukrainian "Maidan revolution" (AKA CIA-inspired coup) took place. One can argue about the precise point in time, but that marked the beginning of the Ukrainian forces' assault on the ethnic Russian region of the DonBas - which successive versions of the Minsk Agreements (with involvement by EU/EU member states) failed to contain.

One can only conclude that Germany has been a NATO colony ever since NATO was founded, and no German politicians were capable of breaking that servitude, despite their post-war status as poster-boy for successful western manufacturing industry. They are now paying the price.

As is Japan, which post-war found itself in much the same situation as a colony of the US deep state.

As will we in the UK if we allow our politicians (AKA illegally indentured servants of the UK deep state) to continue to destroy our energy supply industries.

(10 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

 

A Useful Review of the Transition to Trump

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 738

2025-01-09

This is from the usually terminally tedious group now known as Promethean Action (you remember Prometheus of course?), who for some unaccountable reason now produce a video (or two!) that is not only useful, but tolerable for viewing by normal people.

(There's also a pre-Christmas video that is useful viewing).

And if you are wondering quite where Team Trump is going to take us, this is as good a place as any to start, as it highlights Britain, featuring as well Greenland and Canada, maybe also Panama and even Mexico ... the crumbling EU ... usw.

(17 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Who Is Trump?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 823

2025-01-08

So you think you know your Trump?

Are you sure? 

You may not be so certain after watching this ...

This is a very hard-headed video that will almost certainly challenge anybody's understanding of world events of the past century or so. If you are not prepared for such a challenge, feel free to skip this one.

Bear in mind that many now believe that "everything we were told is a lie". You may or may not accept such a concept, but if you believe in the accepted version of history, the ending sequence of this video may not be for you.

For myself, I am prepared to accept any proposition that is supported by evidence and logic - this attitude does not preclude changing my mind about history, but does mean that I file away a great deal in the "too difficult to know" box, for possible re-evaluation should more information come to light.

Nevertheless this is primarily about the current state of the world, and I'm not prepared to discard the whole video just because I may (or may not) discount parts of it. Truth and untruths have a nasty habit of being interwoven, seemingly even to the point of interchangeability, these days.

That said, carry on:

(46 minutes)

 

 

Canada, Canada, Wherefore Art Thou Canada?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 838

2025-01-08

A tale of incompetence, or of deliberate obfuscation?

We may never know, but it's a salutary story that leaves Canada ...  well, apparently in some sort of legal limbo (don't quote me, I'm not a constitutional lawyer!).

If this could happen to Canada, what other prior colonies might be similarly affected?

And how might this affect the coming changes that 2025/6 may or may not bring forth?

Not to mention anybody with a "Canadian passport"?

(49 minutes)

 

 

We Need a New Paradigm that Implements People Power

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 825

2025-01-07

Since time immemorial, humanity has been organised into groups - some cooperating, some fighting, some dispersed, some concentrated geographically, but in general all under some form of leadership.

If we believe the history books, then these leaders eventually developed into hereditary leadership families known as "Royalty".

Naturally, individual leaders cannot be everywhere at once giving people instruction and judging aberrant behaviours, so the concept of Royal Courts that administered each locality on behalf of the monarch was instituted.

Likewise the monarch could not know everything that perhaps he needed to know, so the concept of the advisory council (Witan in Old England) was born where the monarch could pick the finest brains in the land before determining on any particular course of action. From these beginnings arose our current "Parliamentary Democracy".

Nevertheless, as time moved on, the legal and judicial concepts of the Corporation evolved, to take care of the operation of large enterprises which needed to be organised in order to pursue large projects (good and bad) that reached beyond home shores and were thus beyond the capability of any one person or nation to control - so were the various East India Companies formed, to loot the ships and resources of foreign nations.

We now find ourselves in the situation where the corporate oligarchy has become immensely rich and powerful, indeed sufficiently rich and powerful to control whole nations by corrupt means, and to get away with it, since all information control, alongside judicial control, is also under their own corporate control.

We have sleep-walked into a corporatocracy, accountable only to its shareholders. Thus have the links to the formal power structures of nation states and associated governments of the people been traduced in favour of effective government by immensely rich but unaccountable corporate oligarchs whose motivations do not necessarily align with the normal human scruples of living in peace and prosperity with our neighbour. It's more a case of those who control all the corporations win, and those who exercise the control do not necessarily appear on the shareholders registers.

Secret societies of all kinds also exist for a reason, and that reason doesn't include accountability to humanity.

Result: World Wars and colonialism on a grand scale.

We now appear to be witnessing the collapse of the corporate oligarchy on a global scale. It's going to be messy beyond our imagining, because there is no obvious organisational focus on the other side to which populations may gravitate, but a new world will somehow have to emerge.

It will be out with the old, in with the new ... but what will the new look like?

Well, we've tried "Royalty", we've tried "Parliamentary Democracy", we've degenerated into "Oligarchy" / Fascism (rule by government-corporate "partnership"), and it has not worked. Various attempts both current and historical have also tried theocracy, or rule by religious dogma, but that doesn't work too well either, being inherently inflexible, intolerant, and supremely reluctant to change.

And by now we are all at least acquainted with Klaus Schwab and his nascent New World Technocratic Order where we will all be subsumed into a technocratic control grid, managed by the marvels of AI. In other words, "computer says no" slaves to the system.

What about that old-fashioned American idea, a government of the people by the people and for the people? After all, as someone famous is once reputed to have said, the Americans always come up with the right answer, but only after they have tried everything else first.

Iain Davis explains.

Page 156 of 338