Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

Whitty - Not What You Thought He Was?

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 23 January 2025; Hits: 779

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty ... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective benefit of immunity. And there are reports that the whole process was managed not by the medical authorities but by the military.

The other principle established at Nuremberg was that "obeying orders" was not a sufficient defence in law.

Continuing denials can only take them so far.

We await - no, we demand - the necessary prosecutions.

Justice must be seen to be done.

Stargate - Not What You Think?

Details: Category: Health; Published: 22 January 2025; Hits: 839

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

But not just any AI ...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots for Covid.

I guess we will know soon enough, but mRNA doesn't sound remotely promising, even allied with AI. Especially allied with AI.

But there again, it's a way to get new data centres built for AI that will have many more likely uses than fancy "shots for cancer". For a start, the NWO fanatics will need them for monitoring and control of the new global internet of human slaves ...

Trump Created the Gaza Ceasefire - What Now?

Details: Category: Defence; Published: 22 January 2025; Hits: 799

2025-01-22

Scott Ritter reviews the state of play in the Middle East for the Schiller Institute.

It's complicated, but the current situation, whilst not solving the immediate problem, may open additional options ...

(11 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

UK Parliament Doubles Down on Climate and Nature Bill?

Details: Category: Green; Published: 22 January 2025; Hits: 888

2025-01-22

Tomorrow is the second reading that the Green Blob hopes will send the Climate and Nature Bill speeding its way toward the Statute Book.

So what will it mean for the legendary man on the Clapham Omnibus?

" ... Parliament is due to vote on a Private Member’s Bill that could lead to mass starvation, widespread disease and fatalities and the almost certain collapse of civil liberties and society within a few years"

Is that all? And here I was thinking that it might be serious.

"The bill is a thinly-disguised attempt using meaningless climate and nature crisis verbosity to ration and control almost everything that citizens consume"

Well, my parents had to cope with rationing and much else in WW2 (and beyond), and we survived that ...

"It appears that a near 90% reduction in hydrocarbon use within a decade is sought and this would affect everything from the energy that heats homes and drives a modern economy to the medicines and food that sustains life"

Our food distribution chains are more or less totally dependent upon diesel lorries, so that explains one cause of rationing - it won't be physically possible to move more than 10% of the food that currently gets handled. Can we survive on eating one day out of 10? On the plus side it might make a dent in the obesity crisis.

"People would freeze in winter, there would be no food in the shops or medicines in the hospitals and pharmacies. There would be no power to run sewage treatment plants or hydrocarbon-based chemicals to clean the water. A complete breakdown of law and order would be likely as citizens survive as best they can"

Most of us rely on gas currently for our heating - even those with heat pumps need electricity to run them (currently dependent on gas because no matter how many windmills and solar panels are installed, no wind / no sunshine = no power), so perhaps we can only heat our homes and cook our meals on one day in ten (if the wind happens to blow on the right day)?

And no diesel = no ambulances, so the NHS will have 10% of its previous arrivals to A&E, which might alleviate the insane queuing and trolleying I suppose.

"The bill is short on figures ... "

You don't say!

"But this is not the end of the story since the bill mandates that an account must be taken of emissions released by all UK imports ... "

OK, I give in, this is madness; we get much of our imports from China, who are not going to restrain their fossil fuel consumption for anybody, and even if we do hit net zero (excluding imports) we could never make up for the carbon footprint of the Chinese imports that arrive even if we could measure them, so these objectives obviously cannot be physically implemented.

Maybe our MPs might glance surreptitiously across the Atlantic to see how our brethren of the "Special Relationship" will be holding up their end of the measures to confront the Climate Crisis?

Oh, wait ..!

The American Covid Inquiry

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 22 January 2025; Hits: 814

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire medical-pharmaceutical-industrial-media complex.

Much has been made of the infamous "gain of function" research conducted over time at various locations world-wide under the alleged sponsorship of Dr Fauci. Yet when Covid struck in late 2019 and through 2020, the deaths from all causes barely registered any rise.

How so, when so many were "dying of/with covid"?

Well, most unusually, they were no longer "dying of flu". No surprise one might think, given the measures adopted to test for covid and attribute any subsequent death to covid simply on the basis of the test.

Excess deaths from all causes did start to rise in 2021, coincidentally with the roll-out of the jabs. A coincidence that it seems has never impinged upon the consciousness of our medical regulators, despite the obvious possibilities.

So a plausible hypothesis is that the illusion of a pandemic was perpetrated by simply changing the rules to attribute as many ordinary deaths as possible to the pandemic, and letting the media rip with incessant propaganda about covid deaths, and (when those naturally tailed off into the advancing summer) seguing shamelessly into reporting "cases" ie: positive test results in the asymptomatic population.

These were likely not cases at all, but a true measure of the level of false positive test results obtained by testing the largely healthy population.

If this argument holds water, then what are we to make of the good Dr Fauci's investments in illegal gain-of-function research? Surely the above argument must be false?

But maybe, just maybe, Dr Fauci was protecting a much bigger scam that would bring down the majority of the pharmaceutical industry were it to be exposed? What if (as Dr Mike Yeadon, an erstwhile vice-president of Pfizer UK, now proposes) the whole science of virology is the main scam that must at all costs be protected?

Has anybody yet shown that any alleged virus has ever been proven to cause a disease? It does seem that all FOIA requests for confirmation of an isolation of the SARS-Cov-2 virus (to pick a recent example of some importance) have failed to identify the existence any such sample.

Have the Americans had any better success with their "Covid Inquiry", or "Covid Select" as they call it?

Or were the so obsessed with investigating every possible detail that they failed to challenge the elephant in the room?

Page 151 of 338