2025-12-18
Many of us now realise that Big Corporate of all kinds pharmaceutical agricultural petrochemical etc interests work via their "non-profits" and "charitable foundations" to advance the cause of their respective industries, often in collaboration with government "regulators" and "think tanks" and any other interested "independent" NGOs including the United Nations and its diaspora of largely unaccountable "doers of good" like the WEF.
The question that Interest of Justice is now asking is the pertinent one:-
Can this false cornucopia of self-serving corporate-governmental (BTW: is that not the original definition of fascism according to Benito Mussolini?) bodies ever be made to work for the interests of the people, and if so, how?
To make things more complicated, the above unaccountable plethora of those who would rule the world of organised health is in effect split in two - one arm under the UN and all its works, and the other under RFK Jr and his MAHA project, which is struggling to overcome the regulatory inertia so beloved of vested corporate interests in America and elsewhere.
This is a mammoth problem, and the answer to making this particular mammoth extinct is not going to be simple - even to define it is a considerable exercise that I of J should be commended for nailing so precisely.
"The reality is that neither option exists. What’s emerging is a multi-polar competition over who controls global health policy—and every player is compromised"
"The BRICS+ alternative ... could provide middle-income nations alternatives to WHO or U.S. frameworks ... but democratic accountability isn’t the priority"
Quite so.
There is much about "sovereignty" here, but little about the sovereignty of the individual person which is still protected by law almost everywhere. Nobody is entitled to force a medical intervention on anybody else without their informed consent (and certainly no experimental intervention) whilst the Nuremberg Codes hold.
So until this mess gets sorted out, we need to get ourselves informed as best we can, and be prepared to say "no", gently but very firmly.
Maybe we should just remember: "We are what we eat", and diet was 90% of good health for thousands of years before any of these mostly 20th/21st century supra-personal bodies were invented.
