Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Pay Your (Durham County) Council Tax if You Want To?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 950

2025-02-13

Martin Geddes (yes, he again) now summarises (with a little help from ChatGPT) just why he considers that Durham County Council may be outside the law in terms of its council tax enforcement processes.

That isn't at all to say that all councils are similarly suspect - I have no details - but nor can I rule it out, especially as many of them, like CDOS (see the article) will be members of the CIVEA (Civil Enforcement Association) and may be thought likely to have similar systems to Durham CC.

"These assaults on the public appear to be war crimes (as enemy combatants), crimes against humanity, and terrorist attacks — so fall under international human rights law and military jurisdiction"

Is Your Council Tax Enforcement Really Fraudulent?

Whatever the truth of all this is, it is also true that contesting a legally unenforceable demand within a corrupt system is a different ball-game altogether, and likely to involve much time, worry, and perhaps confrontation - as individuals we should choose our battles wisely to avoid over-extending ourselves.

 

Ole Dammegard Connects the Dots

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 1027

2025-02-13

Weapons of Mass Destruction, NATO, USSR, hot wars, cold wars, Covid, false flags, UN Agenda 21, WEF, Ukraine, biolabs, Putin, Zelensky, etc plus Ole's family history, and a hot tip from his father.

Oh, and look out for a significant sprinkling of bombshell surprises ..!

There are so many dots connected here that 2 hours seems an impossibly short period in which to cover them.

" ... the United Nations ... why did we have to unite? The world was a beautiful place before ... the first world war that was created by ... "

"When you look at the Russian Revolution, it wasn't a revolution at all ... "

"... don't buy into what you're being told ... "

This is an absorbing history lesson - we think we know our history, but its not until we identify the threads that sew it together that we can begin to pick up a fuller understanding of how we really got to where we are today, and those threads are hidden for a reason.

It is sometimes said that those who do not understand history are doomed to repeat it - many a true word is spoken in jest. Let us pray for more revelations of historical importance (although if recent events are any guide I doubt we can actually avoid them).

(2 hrs 9 mins)

 

 

The Trump Train Rolls On Relentless

Details
Category: Greater Reset!
Hits: 849

2025-02-13

Will the Trump Train not pause to allow more passengers to board?

If you are not aboard already, it's not stopping now for anyone. The contrast with the much-quoted EU train that the UK was so earnestly exhorted to join before it too departed (in that case for the wonderfully fabled but ill-defined EUtopia) is unmissable. But whither goes the Trump Train?

Fresh from the successful blitzkrieg on the various federal agencies of corruption (and possibly treason) such as (but not limited to) the now infamous USAID, the next suburbs to be passed through will be the major historical false flag attacks:

The JFK, RFK, and Martin Luther King  assassinations

The Epstein client list and (perhaps) his "suicide"  

The 9/11 attack on the twin towers (and building 7's "spontaneous" collapse)

And (last but by no means least) the origins of Covid.

This could take a while ... or if USAID is any guide, it will all be done by next Friday! Still, if Congress is involved, I'm guessing we may be looking at weeks/months rather than days.

I don't suppose that they will get everything right, but it's hard to see how they could get any of these more wrong than they are already, and it will all likely be done in public, or there would be no point to it.

Let us hope and pray that these investigations will fare better than the UK's "Covid Inquiry", whose terms of reference seem designed to steer it well away from the truth.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth report.

I wonder when the faking of the 2020 election result will appear trackside? Logic says it will be the penultimate stop once the current stage-play is acted out - the pretence that the federal USA government still has any authority or valid basis in law surely couldn't survive that recognition.

The ultimate destination of this train I will leave as an exercise for my readers. After all, you know as much as, and more than, I do.

 

The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 910

2025-02-12

This Bill, currently wending its way through Parliament, looks set to reach the Statute Book just as soon as their Lordships have finished with it and passed it on to the Monarch for his Royal Assent.

Given that the Labour Party has a stonking majority in the Commons, there will be no delaying its arrival before their Lordships.

Given also the Government's obsession with ultimately centralising all powers of any note unto itself, it's no surprise that this bill is long on rhetoric and very very short on devolution (after all, if it started devolving powers to, say, parents, there would be a chaotic free-for-all and the government would have nothing to do except twiddle its thumbs and dream of powers forsaken).

Let us in the interests of brevity quote directly from the government's own "Policy Summary Notes" document:

The ambitions of the Bill are set out in seven key parts:

    • Making a child-centred government
    • Keeping families together and children safe
    • Supporting children with care experience to thrive
    • Cracking down on excessive profit making
    • Driving high and rising standards for every child
    • Removing barriers to opportunity in schools
    • Creating a safer and higher quality education system for every child

OK, it's feel-good verbiage that coming from politicians, tells us nothing useful, but  ...  what exactly is a "child-centred government", and why should we want it?

Happily, the first part of this question is answered robustly:

  • Make a child-centred government by facilitating a statutory framework to authorise the deprivation of liberty of children with complex needs in accommodation provided for the purposes of treatment and care; strengthening Ofsted’s powers in relation to children’s social care providers by giving them the power to issue fines for breaches of the Care Standards Act 2000, including to unregistered providers, and enabling them to hold provider groups to account for quality issues in the provision of care; regulating the use of agency workers in children’s social care; and protecting 16 and 17 year olds from ill-treatment or wilful neglect.

So ... if my child has "complex needs", the government's first instinct will be to look after my child by locking him/her up in an institution of its choosing, then regulating such "providers" to ensure that they are fined and inspected and punished and work within the statutory guidelines and on no account take any dreadful untried and unsupported initiative outside of those guidelines, because being government-mandated guidelines they are of course perfect for my child - who will now be deprived of the reassuring consistent presence of his/her parents, whilst feeling totally insecure and unprotected in new and strange surroundings under ever-rotating unfamiliar carers who attend according to changeable schedules.

I don't doubt that for the most severe cases of parental neglect or parental incompetence such measures may in extremis be warranted, but if this is setting the tone for thinking about "children's wellbeing" then I am concerned.

Keep families together and children safe by mandating local authorities to offer family group decision making so that all families with children on the edge of care have an opportunity to form a plan of family-led care, improving information sharing across and within agencies, strengthening the role of education in multi-agency safeguarding arrangements and implementing multi-agency child protection teams. 

We can see where this is going. If the local authority (advised by its 'sharing and caring' agencies) in its wisdom decides that a child is being inadequately managed by its parents/guardians then it can effectively compel parental behaviour more to its liking, with the implied threat that if compliance isn't forthcoming then the child can be removed from their care.

The whole family thus becomes subject to state control, and state control means control by AI.

Today, the AI is the Statute book and its surrounding agencies (local authorities, care providers, NHS behavioural specialists, etc, all supported by a plethora of rules guidelines and protocols).

Tomorrow (or at current rate of "progress", later this afternoon) the "family group" will be clustered around the screen to receive its latest "advice" from their AI-Family-Chatbot care-advisor app, which will issue penalties for missed appointments and forfeits for wrong-think, or in the worst case it will notify the goon-squad to come knocking.

Perhaps I exaggerate a little just now ...  but would you bet on it?

And so far I have only looked at the the first couple of paragraphs. We ignore this Bill at our children's peril.

Like most government initiatives, it is based on the presumption that a better world will result if we can only legislate for everything that could possibly go wrong and every risk that we will possibly encounter, and that by following the expert advice we will stay safe and happy in a government-mandated Utopia, enjoying our government supported freedom to comply with all its inevitably-proliferating rules and regulations.

There is no such thing as absolute safety. The first law of the Universe is " If it can go wrong, it will".

The best we can hope for is for it to go wrong safely - but even that can never be ensured.

Bringing up children is best handled by those who have brought them into the world, who have cared for them through helpless babyhood and happy toddlerhood and who share a loving trusting and intimate relationship with them. As kids grow older they will interact with the State as necessary under the direction of their parents, who naturally take responsibility for their behaviour until they become adults.

At what age and for what causes does it become acceptable for Government to override parental responsibility?

There are risks associated with parental responsibility, and there are risks associated with government responsibility, and it seems to me that total avoidance of risk is impossible. 

Where the relationship is based upon love, the risk is lower overall than where it is based upon monetary reward. Motivation is everything.

Draw your own conclusions.

(See links for more information. Read the Bill here)

David Starkey Analyses the State of Britain Today

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 795

2025-02-11

"Here is a man who has never read anything apart from a legal textbook, and an Arsenal Programme"

This may start a bit slowly, but David Starkey makes an interesting and perceptive analysis of our current state/State, and clearly puts across the value of our (now neglected) historical heritage - we don't know what we have until it's been lost.

" ... we f****ed up partly because we became 'experts' ... "

Expertise in a narrow field is no substitute for breadth of knowledge and experience.

He gives us much to think about, and in the process, helps us realise that what we as a society now lack is the influential wisdom of experienced and knowledgeable elders - we no longer value the depth of understanding that such aldermen (using the word in its historical sense) should bring to our new and upcoming generations.

Can anybody seriously imagine that the absurd UN Climate Change Agendas-21/25/50 would ever have survived contact with such aldermen? 

Could our electoral systems ever be capable to facilitate their reintroduction?

(57 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Page 143 of 338