Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Legal "Just in Case" Rule

Details
Category: Legal
Hits: 901

2025-06-21

Parliament to the rescue?

"A rarely used tool in the legal toolkit could force unconstitutional acts into the open"

So says Martin Geddes, who has asked his AI to unearth the legal routes by which possible illegal or unconstitutional court cases may be challenged.

Only for use when the legality of the proceedings is disputed.

 

Robin Hood Asserts

Details
Category: Legal
Hits: 855

2025-06-21

"Robin Hood" asserts that all Courts in the UK have been fraudulent ever since at least the 1990s and quite possibly earlier.

When our erstwhile monarchy signed us away into the EU, it thereby lost all the authority previously enjoyed, by failing to defend us against the imposition of rule by foreigners not bound by our ancient constitution.

Some might consider that "treason". 

But he asserts that Courts are anyway no longer "Crown Courts" ever since the Crown Officers were removed.

What we have now are Corporate Courts whose only authority is to mediate differences between Corporate entities under the Law of the Sea. As individual subjects of the monarchy living on the land, we don't come under the Corporate Law of the Sea.

So they bamboozle us with English words with undisclosed legalese meanings that we as uneducated non-legal people not only do not understand, but we are bound to misunderstand ("misinformation" anybody?) - they give us a capitalised legal fiction name at birth and then let us identify ourselves as that legal fiction when we appear in Court, thus adopting their requirement to appear before them as a corporate entity that can be adjudicated under the law of the sea. That is deceit and the offence is to withhold the whole truth of what is going on.

"In order to make sense of this, you need to grasp how our courts have abandoned constitutional rights in favour of commercial maritime law, as per the Crown Agents Act 1995, with effective dissolution in 1997. This marked a jurisdictional severance: agents once bound by common law fiduciary duty were replaced with corporate contractors enforcing policy."

Martin Geddes notes exactly how this legal switch is both hidden and enforced.

 

Israel v Iran - Update

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 737

2025-06-20

Scott Ritter reviews the state of hostilities.

It all hinges on America, so what will Trump do?

(68 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Police in Chaos Over Sudden Deaths?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 866

2025-06-20

John O'Looney is a funeral director from Milton Keynes, who was outspoken during the "Covid emergency" for his work in identifying novel "fibrous clots" in the bodies of the deceased that came his way.

Now he highlights some unexpected changes in the way that police handle sudden unexpected deaths, apparently (according to his local Coroner) as a result of new advice from the government about the requirements when dealing with those who have died suddenly. 

John is not impressed. See what you think:

(20 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Why Politics is Now Impossible

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 832

2025-06-19

Eugippius is a German commentator, but all of Europe including the UK suffers from the same stultifying political blight, all caused by certain topics being off-limits for discussion.

We all know what they are because if our political classes continue to pursue them in the same way as now, we will all be in the dustbin of civilisation when the lights go out - and trying to claw our way out of that bin will be between impossible and impracticable, because those who lead us are burning the bridges back to sanity, ie: the power-stations that can be proven to power the grid effectively are being shuttered.

No amount of wishful thinking will ever enable the intermittent renewables to reliably do the job. Nuclear is a good power source that can power a grid - but then renewables would be unnecessary! Nuclear as a back-up for intermittent renewables simply turns the economics on its head, since we would be paying the whole cost of nuclear for marginal benefit.

We either pay for nuclear or we don't - there are no half measures.

If we pay for it, there is no point in not using it when the wind blows and the sun shines.

Unlike gas, for which the initial investment is low and the running costs are higher, so as a backup they could perform better alongside renewables (but again, why not run them continuously and scrap costly renewables?).

The logic isn't hard, but in the West, logic and free speech have been demonised as wrong-headed.

Page 138 of 386