Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

2025-11-02

Operation Talla was either:

  • the UK's national coordinated policing response to the COVID19 pandemicie: one UK police force working together (sic) under one national operation, or
  • individual police forces working operationally independently in accord with national statute and NPCC guidance

"The contradiction could not be more striking. The Home Secretary explicitly celebrated centralisation; the NPCC later denied it existed"

(NPCC: National Police Chiefs' Council)

I suppose we might say that the NPCC's guidance to the Chief Constables was just that - guidance - and so still compliant with the law, but when does "guidance" stray into "instruction"? When it's in furtherance of a national Police Operation perhaps?

The fact that no police service stepped out of line despite all of them being served with complaints backed by copious evidence about crimes being committed speaks volumes to the lay mind.

There is no doubt in my mind that informed consent for what amounted to a gigantic experiment based on minimally-tested mRNA technology was effectively bypassed, in full and blatant contravention of the Nuremberg Codes.

Someone - almost everyone - here seems to be skating on the thinnest of thin legal ice, and perhaps one might sue the government for damages, but in practice I doubt any Court will look at any case any time soon if the Geddes Experience is any guide.

Read the full hair-splitting farrago here, courtesy of Ethical Approach UK (with the suggestion that maybe they might get their web-site into a navigable state some time soon ... )