Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Operation Talla Exposed as Unconstitutional

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 443

2025-11-29

(11 minutes)

2025-11-28

It is now common knowledge, or at least knowledge in the public domain, that the police forces nationally were ordered not to investigate allegations and evidence of unlawful activity in connection with the 2020/21 and later Covid vaccination drives.

They are alleged to have behaved as an arm of government rather than as impartial enforcers of the law.

Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and Mark Sexton (retired police constable) have been investigating how this came about.

They now address the top tier responsible for Constitution and Justice (the Lady Chief Justice, the Secretary of State for Justice, the Attorney General for England and Wales, the Chair of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, and the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service) to invite their views.

"Why were all vaccine-related crime reports, including CRN 6029679/21, shut down under an unlawful national directive?"

"The evidence proves a systemic collapse of constitutional safeguards and the rule of law."

“The police must be seen to be enforcing criminal law, not to appear to act as the coercive agents of ministers.”

“ ... public health advice was incorrectly enforced by the police as though it were law.”

"The gravity of these issues ... requires immediate and direct action. Every other avenue of reporting has been exhausted and involved institutions have simply engaged in a circular loop of non-accountability, which is why this current correspondence to yourselves is an essential step"

"Given the criminality, concealment and constitutional implications, this matter cannot be delegated to subordinates. We require a direct response from each of you"

Although marked "Private and Confidential" this (redacted) document is in the public domain and  sourced from Mark Sexton.

Read the (redacted) communication.

It has also to be noted that the events of 2020/21 and subsequent were driven globally but probably primarily from within the United States. That cannot excuse guilty parties within the UK, since we are not member of the United States. 

 

 

"We Can Do This the Easy Way, or ... the Ugly Way"

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 185

2025-11-27

Once more Alex Krainer shares his view of the on-going negotiations posturings over Ukraine, and whither the Donald's new "peace plan" (same as the old "peace plan") is likely to lead.

Venezuela also features ... along with the same playbook that kicked off WW1 ...

As always, he is worth listening to -- except for the mention of the Hallett Inquiry, of which our readers are already aware, although there may be more to this than meets the eye ...

(90 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Stand With Us!

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 331

2025-11-26

First up, a plea from Mark Attwood to those NHS and other medical staff who now realise that maybe, just maybe, inoculating the public at large with novel medical technology that

  • had been developed "at warp speed" within months whilst earlier vaccines had required years of testing,
  • had not been approved for general use except under an Emergency Use Authorisation,
  • to allegedly defend against the "emergency" of a deadly "pandemic" that had no statistically significant effect upon the normally expected rate of "deaths from all causes", 
  • which overwhelmingly "killed" people with comorbidities at around their expected lifespan, and  had no measurable effect on children who were nevertheless inoculated anyway,
  • which was administered without any pretence at "informed consent", and indeed for some people under coercion, 
  • and for everybody, under a pervasive institutional psychological campaign to instill an unwarranted pathological fear of "the pandemic" 

was

a) Not a good idea
b) Would likely entail unacceptable risks
c) Would leave doctors and medical staff open to criminal charges under the Nuremberg Codes

If you now realise this failure, it's not too late to come clean, admit it, and act accordingly. It will drive another nail into the pandemic narrative's coffin, and it really is your own judgement that will now count.

Think on.

Secondly: Following on from a previous article, Interest of Justice reminds us how the pandemic was a fraud, that the WHO failed to defend itself in Costa Rica:

"The significance of this institutional testimony lies in its establishment of mens rea—the requisite mental element for establishing that the violations were not inadvertent policy failures but rather deliberate institutional actions undertaken with full knowledge of the legal and medical implications"

"The Costa Rican Constitutional Chamber has rendered decisions establishing that governmental actions violated constitutional protections. International litigation mechanisms are now examining state obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Disciplinary proceedings against governmental and institutional actors are proceeding through multiple jurisdictions. The vindication, though delayed, is becoming institutional reality."

Quite so.

Stand with them if you can. This won't happen without public support. Not only do "many hands make light work", in this case "many hands make legal history".

Be part of it!

 

"Our" National Harms Service

Details
Category: Child Abuse
Hits: 648

2025-11-26

The NHS is showing its "progressive" tendencies.

Despite the many good people still trying to make this unstable top-heavy unaccountable progressivistic leviathan work for our benefit, its leadership is myopic, management is treated as a specialism in its own right and thus populated by expert managers, and the stench of rank stupidity has become intolerable.

Other than that the NHS is wonderful of course and we wouldn't have it any other way ...

 

The Jury is Out!

Details
Category: Legal
Hits: 233

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the "mess of pottage" loosely but misleadingly known as "Progressivism" (AKA modern Parliamentarianism). And yes, we are well down that road today already ...

And yes, indeed we do need "progress", but toward what end? Is it to be toward the sovereignty of the people over their government, or toward the sovereignty of those self-righteous scoundrels miscreants (AKA politicians) and technocrats who would set themselves up to rule over the people for their own ends? 

Will Jones reports.

 

Page 96 of 414