Conspiracy Corner

2025-01-23

"Chris Whitty... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"

"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"

If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective

2025-01-22

From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:

AI

But not just any AI...

Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?

Does Trump believe this stuff?

Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots

2025-01-22

A timely reminder that Davos is still a thing, although whether "of beauty and a joy for ever" may be debatable. 

What tedious extrusions of verbiage must we decode this year? Sadly the event may have been overshadowed by that other show unfolding over in Washington-no-longer-DC (?) that seems to be attracting much global media coverage. Whether the attracted levels of interest are due to the contrasting styles of the chief protagonists, or to the likely success of their respective endeavours, is a question that may be pondered. Time will tell.

See the full timetable here, courtesy of Interest of Justice.

Be sure to mark your calendar to make sure you don't miss your favourite items!

2025-01-22

The continuing UK Covid Inquiry has been, some believe, just a gargantuan whitewash exercise in favour of the team that brought us the Covid "pandemic".

The US too has had its own version of the Covid Inquiry, so how does it fare by comparison? And does anybody care? Should anybody care?

In my view, yes we should, because right or wrong, it betrays much about current thinking and therefore likely future "pandemic" planning. Will such be based upon firmer ground than last time?

We on this site have made our views clear, that the whole operation was a simple scam based upon blatant manipulation of the statistics on a global scale, a manipulation designed to divert attribution of the normal seasonal winter deaths away from the normal flu-like and towards the SARS-Cov-2 Covid label; yet even so a scam so tricky that perhaps it threatened to expose another vastly greater scam, that in turn threatened the reputation and future of almost the entire

2025-01-21

Are you a living breathing human being, with family, friends, acquaintances, aspirations, skills, qualifications, life history, health issues, and opinions that have all been hard-come-by?

Or are you a 64-bit sequence of ones and zeroes on a computer database somewhere "in the cloud"?

Would you prefer to deal with another flesh and blood human being, capable of recognising you for what you are, and your circumstances for what they are, or should you just quote your id number to an AI system that has somebody else's values and objectives (not necessarily known to you) built into its code?

"The Open Society, the Gates Foundation, the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, they are in direct control of the UK"

The problems with government are actually many, but the primary problem is that they want to govern.

...

2025-01-20

Once more Martin Geddes shares his thoughts, this time on today's event, what it may portend, and how he feels at the end of a number of years reacting to the unfolding events, and the understandings that they have spawned.

That he has been brave enough and understanding enough to share much of that journey with us is in itself quite heroic - that he has left us with his work on the Q phenomenon and much else besides leaves us with a debt that we cannot repay, and that he had already forgiven.

We can only try to live up to our own destinies with similar fortitude and generosity.

Today is the Day.

2025-01-20

Goodbye old world, Hello new world, same as the old world?

So we stand at the precipice, yet it's too early to tell for sure how things will develop.

Certainly the ceasefire in Gaza is a positive sign that demonstrates an unlikely level of leverage over an intransigent regime that has myopically and single-mindedly pursued its inglorious aims of expansion and domination ever since the now infamous Balfour Declaration appeared in the wake of the end of WW2. 

Yet the verdict of the American people in the 2024 election has broken a logjam.

Clearly something new is up, but what exactly that is will only be unveiled over time. The geopolitical world has many moving parts, some of which have been immobile and rusting for far too long to now spring swiftly and surely into action - the makers of WD40 should make a killing!

Read

2025-01-19

Dr David Martin tells it like it is - once more.

Let us pray that he doesn't have to say it again.

(26 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-19

"Grooming Gang" territories, to mention three not at random.

These are murky waters wherein the judicial authorities intersected with local and national politicians, police, and indeed the press, evidently to suppress the criminal tragedies that took place over many years.

Consequently, informed and considered discussion about these matters is difficult to find, and prone to degenerate into political point-scoring which isn't productive.

So I welcome this interview between Peter Whittle and Simon Danczuk, a former Labour MP for Rochdale, who gamely answers Peter's questions as best he could - nobody comes out of this topic totally smelling of roses, but it is the sort of discussion that actually does advance our understanding of what took place, how and why, and what might now be best done about it.

You may or may not agree with everything said, but they do bring out some highly pertinent

2025-01-18

The Roman Catholic Church is infamous for its past activities that led to much suffering and death for those honest enough to make up their own minds about its doctrines and to live their lives accordingly. That isn't to suggest that other denominations were always blameless!

Rather than using such diverse opinions as learning opportunities for both parties, the Church sought to stamp them out in manner calculated to scare possible adherents to shut up and conform at least outwardly to Catholic dogma.

But was the Church ever about saving the faithful, or was it set up by the Roman Emperor of the time to corral those unruly Christians under the reliable leadership of his own bishops? Which motivation aligns with the Inquisition?

One may at least ask similar questions of the social media giants of today - were they set up to promote unfettered legal freedom of speech for the masses, or were they created by the CIA so that governments worldwide could

2025-01-17

As a blast from the past, few come as stormy as David Icke.

And few come as pointedly difficult to disagree with.

Do watch for a cracking video clip, delivered without any sense of irony, that just has to be seen to be believed.

A recommended commentary on the current state of the world. It's your viewpoint that counts.

(41 minutes)

2025-01-17

Well, obviously, when it's a whitewash.

That's rather a blunt start to any article, but I feel that it sets the right tone.

And it's not really even controversial - after all, everything about the Covid "pandemic" has been corrupted from the start, so why should the inquiry in the aftermath be any different?

So specifically for those who can't tear their attention away from this sophisticated study into how the great and the good persist in manipulating a public inquiry to ensure that it produces the desired favourable results, HART bring us their commentary on "Module 4 Vaccines and therapeutics day 1 Tuesday 14th of January".

Enjoy.

The rest of us will no doubt find no shortage of more useful learnings to

2025-01-15

Well, it's certainly an opportune time to review how we got here on a number of fronts, so here is a very useful summary of all the major features of these so far unproven assertions.

"If you still buy into the man-made global warming narrative and are willing to surrender your sovereignty, not just for yourself, but for your family, your community, and your country, to a group of elitist globalists who fear you, then that's truly something"

"If CO₂ were responsible for trapping heat in Earth’s atmosphere, we would see a direct, measurable correlation between CO₂ concentrations and global temperatures. But we don’t"

"The Earth is a self-regulating, closed system. When temperature increases, CO₂ is released from oceans, permafrost, and soil, but it’s the temperature that initiates the release, not the other way around" 

...

2025-01-14

Here is one view of our situation as 2025 commences.

Whilst much of this summary is true, it obviously doesn't cover everything that is going on.

The truth is that no human being has a monopoly on the truth - we have to accept that, and work together to do what must be done.

"... they need us on our knees, they need us begging... hopeless... powerless... completely dependent on them, and they will do whatever it takes to make that happen "

It does appear so. "They" also need us isolated from each other, to prevent communication. If you are reading this, how well is that working?

"... you need to do what you can with what you have where you are, to not just become the best possible version of yourself but to create a life that you are in charge of... "

When push comes to shove, after we have made

2025-01-14

Well, it turns out that British weather in British winters can be quite varied. Some years the thermometer hardly dips to zero, let alone below it, and other years the weather gods send us glacial temperatures for days, even weeks on end, amidst flat calm wind conditions such as have been prevalent this winter.

And strange to say, the sun also is at its lowest ebb, the winter days are short and the nights long, and moonlight and starlight fire up no solar panels just as wind turbines hang listless for want of a gust. Naturally this comes as a surprise to many in government, who despite being told of these realities until the tellers are blue in the face (and not just from cold), they have had their attention fixed inexorably on the UN-WEF/IPCC models which perhaps have not actually modelled the variability of the British climate in particular, with sufficient precision.

After Professor Ferguson's models (of Covid pandemic infamy) one is tempted to say that we are surprised at the level of blind faith

2025-01-13

As far as I know there is no suggestion that the these weapons were used in LA, but they do seem to be available should the authorities (or anyone else with access) decide that they might use them.

Nor is there a suggestion that anybody has specific plans to use them on the civil population.

Still, forewarned is forearmed...

(18 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-01-13

Of course the prime focus this week is on the fires in LA - the similarities with the fires in Maui at Lahaina being noted.

The difference of course is that the victims in Maui were not from the affluent classes, so maybe the motivations were more complex...

An informative article this week, as usual covering multiple topics.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

2025-01-12

This site has maintained that the Covid "pandemic" was a hoax from beginning to end.

Why? Because "they" went to absurd lengths to fix the statistics to make it appear so. If there was a real pandemic, why the need?

Dr Yeadon even believes that the whole "science" of virology is unproven, which would set the cat amongst the pigeons big time. I don't go as far as to assert that, since I don't have the evidence, but I suspect that he's right...

There is so much apparently wrong with the Covid jabs that we might feel non-plussed about where to start.

Dr Mike Yeadon (whom I have followed since 2020) has done a lot of good work in this area, and you can find his substack here.

Dr Roger Hodkinson Speaks to Anna Brees about Covid

2025-01-11

Nick Hubble discusses the power sources of the future, and whether the grid will still be providing our power in the future.

Net Zero CO₂ has come to mean net zero power, which would mean a far smaller population able to subsist off its own land. That isn't what we have become accustomed to, nor is it acceptable to the population at large.

So failing the elusive zero-point energy, or the nuclear fusion that we are still being assured is "just around the corner" (as it, like the cure for cancer, has been for around the last 50 years - just bung us a few squillions more dosh and we'll be wheeling it out in no time), how is our power sourcing likely to evolve from here?