Legal Legal Repeal

2022-10-01

James Harvey has been making a name for himself (Students Against Tyranny, Voice of Wales, UNN) by taking the weapon of publicity to the authorities, and if you have a mind to spend a half hour listening to this interview you will learn how some of those who were arrested at the 2020 Covid demonstrations experienced our police and judicial systems.

It's an interview that makes a pleasant change from the polemics of the commentators, and brings out the human aspects of these experiences in a manner that I found quite engaging.

Our future is safe with young people like these.

And it's not all bad news!

(32 minutes)

2022-09-27

I found this article of interest, not because I am fascinated by the complexities of law but because it seems that these largely unknown unrecognised and unacknowledged complexities may be cause for serious concern, given that the ostensible function of a court is to achieve justice.

I'm sure there is a lot more here than meets the eye, but some of the historical developments noted certainly provide an interesting glimpse of the legal mindset as it has evolved over the years.

I'm sure that this website holds many more items of interest for those that wish to explore further.

Canon 3228 : The Twelve Presumptions of Court

Whilst

2022-09-27

We first reported on this from the viewpoint of Reiner himself, so today we redress the balance by bringing you Viviane Fischer's explanation of the rift.

A sorry tale indeed, and one that should never have been allowed to fester for so long.

As always, it's your judgement that counts.

(10 minutes) German with English subtitles

And here, Reiner responds more directly to Viviane's assertions. The subtitling seems to be by AI and is tricky to follow, but you do get the gist... 

Reiner Fuellmich Leaves the Corona Committee!!

2022-09-23

So what's new you ask?

And anyway, the UK isn't demanding coerced injections any more...   but if any employer in the UK is so doing (or tries it on once more), the law (according to "down under") is on your side.

No, it's not really anything new, but it is a new twist that potentially evens the argument. Instead of arguing against your possibly remote and effectively faceless employer, you can argue with the person waiting to inject you.

This could even the odds up considerably.

Of course the Australian precedent may not be recognised in a UK Court, but coerced medical intervention (especially with a needle) has always been considered assault and battery under Common Law (in my understanding).

So ask the person wielding the needle their identity and tell them that you are being coerced to take the jab, pointing out that they will be guilty of assault if they do

2022-09-22

And not just the Daily Sceptic - the Free Speech Union and Toby Young himself have been adjudged too free with their speech - or something; the reasoning behind this is about as clear as mud, so it's pretty obvious that it doesn't stand up.

In this case it is Paypal that is reportedly acting as judge jury and executioner, no appeal possible.

So if you had a regular donation to either the Daily Sceptic or the Free Speech Union, you will have received an email from Toby directly - if you haven't had the email then you are not affected.

Under Law it should be open to Toby to sue Paypal for restitution and damages. It would be for Paypal to demonstrate that their terms and conditions had indeed been broken. Under our official legal  system this is inordinately expensive, but in a Common Law Court it should be feasible, and simple enough, although enforcing judgement would be

2022-09-20

Announcement by the International Common Law Court of Justice.

This site has no opinion on such proceedings, except to say that the charges are indeed extremely grave and the function of the Court is to try them in public to see whether there is any truth in them. If there is none, then the charges should be rejected.

Let justice be done and be seen to be done. 

Certainly it would be impossible for the King as constitutional monarch to be tried by his own Courts in the UK.

In this instance, this does not appear to be a trial, it is simply an investigation by a tribunal. Presumably if the tribunal concludes that a trial is necessary, it will be called for a later date.

It should be stated that

022-09-13

Learn about Common Law Courts.

No, it's not a court, it's a process legal under common law for the people to hold their own courts.

Common Law Court is also an administrative organisation that provides educational and other services relating to Common Law. 

This Q&A video introduces us to their activities and you can visit their Common Law Court website for the full information.

(28 minutes)

Watch this video here.

NB: The URL for the CLC Currency is https://clc-currency.uk/ 
     

2022-09-11

The destruction of the twin towers in Manhattan resulted in the deaths of around 3000 people, ushering in the "war on terror". 

It was followed up by an official report that many in the civil engineering fraternity flat-out rejected as totally implausible.

The official blanking of all the professional criticism that ensued raised the alarming thought that this was an inside job that had to be kept covered up come what may.

This sober film has been made to show the world why that narrative is still unbelievable and still contended, 21 years later.

"... there is no obligation for the government to issue a truthful report"

(2hrs 43mins)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

Unless you are well-advise or well-versed or both, probably best not to try this at home!

Unhappily this is not helped by the poor video quality, but I guess it was shot on a mobile phone. It makes it difficult to pinpoint the precise legal arguments, but I'm certain that this case will not be the last of its kind.

Here is another case (Council Tax) that is wending its way through the courts:

Federal-Social-Media Collusion Hits the Courts

2022-08-31

Do we want a MEGA hat?!

A Make England Great Again hat?

It's a catchy concept that has some allure.

Did you know that there is an English Constitution Party? Nor me, but our English Constitution deserves to be widely known and respected.

How is it not already widely known? Because our schools do not teach it!

It is said that our Constitution is the antidote to slavery - so one may ask what happened to it? Since slavery is a hot topic these days, the antidote should be equally hot, so why do our schools not teach it? Do our elites not want it widely known?

It isn't just England that is in trouble, the whole (mainly English speaking) western world, all of which governments tried to treat their entire populations like slaves

2022-08-29

Philip Flower (former Met Police Chief Superintendent) writes for the Daily Mail:

"... senior officers appear to have completely lost sight of their basic role: to catch and deter criminals... "

"... junior colleagues, the products of a woke education system, often have totally unrealistic notions of what their job entails... "

"Drug-dealing, burglaries, car theft, dangerous driving, mass shoplifting raids and all kinds of other crime seems to go increasingly unchecked"

"As recently as 2014-2015, some 16 per cent of reported offences led to a suspect being charged. That figure has collapsed"

" ‘Pride is one of the many wonderful community events we are there to police,’ he said, ‘but also to allow people to look behind the uniform and see who we are’

2022-08-29

We in the UK might equivalently ask "are you a citizen of England / Scotland / Wales / Northern Ireland, or are you a citizen of the UNITED KINGDOM?

Are we free if we have to pay taxes under coercion?

Are we free if we have to obey the commands of our government under coercion?

Are our make-believe democratic governments really only the "acceptable" face behind which the bankers exert the real control?

It's your decision.

(16 minutes)

Below is the Derek Johnson video referred to above, concerning the status of Donald J. Trump.  Yes it's a bit long, so it takes second place in this article - not everyone has the time.

OnLine Harms Safety Bill - Lord Sumption Comments

2022-08-22

A timely reminder of the Nuremberg Trials and the establishment of the Code with regard to the control of medical experiments on people.

This 75th Annual Commemoration was called by the Action Alliance 75 Years Nuremberg Code.

You can also watch the video (6hrs 38 minutes!) of the event. 

Too few seem to remember the Nuremberg code these days, so perhaps we should offer a handy pocket-sized reminder (A6 double-sided foldable).

We might also remind ourselves that the excuse that "I was following orders" was

2022-08-21

Case Study of a 90 yr old man who died in hospital: Eric Levy.

"How on earth does a patient ... who's voluntarily admitted themselves (due to a bang on the head) for a routine check-up, end up unable to discharge themselves from their hospital, being deemed incapable of making the decision to discharge themselves, being put on an end-of-life "care pathway" which includes the nil-by-mouth protocol, not being fed solid food... eventually leading to their passing away?"

There are legal steps here which we may all feel it wise to take well before we are taken to hospital, if we wish to retain control over our own fate.

(98 minutes)

2022-08-20

The Save Our Rights campaign group tells it like it is.

Never mind the gas/electricity bills (distracting as they are) - take note of these Parliamentary Bills, in the pipeline.

These are in addition to other highly dubious Bills already signed into law, such as the UK - Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill 2019-21.

None of them enhance our freedoms, all of them compromise them.

We are under progressive attack by "our own" government.

Where is the popular demand for these

2022-08-18

Whilst one may be a supporter of Net Zero if one considers the need to be proven and the promoters (the WEF-UN partnership) to be trustworthy, one may also suspect that governments and "public-private-partnerships" could be used to funnel public cash into private pockets via payment for bogus services, possibly via short-lived limited liability companies.

Indeed, given the size of some of these contracts it's quite hard to see how such large sums could otherwise be spent to so little effect.

So if the Net Zero scam can be purposed to bring more clarity (and hopefully integrity) to the opaque world of the award of public contracts, then in principle one should support that.

The Good Law project has demonstrated in the past how much Covid procurement was "mishandled" using favoured