Health

2022-11-11

There are many now who believe that the Covid jabs have led to increasing numbers of stillbirths and other issues around maternity care, but DR EMMA JONES writing for Unherd catalogues a history of problems in NHS maternity units going back well before the start of the "pandemic", from the point of view of one who has personally lived the experience.

"I thought I had seen everything. But nothing prepares you for O&G"

"This internal politics put lives at risk"

"Once held up as a beacon of good practice, it is now seen as enabling the 'worst scandal in NHS history' "

"Following publication of the report, ... Police were said have identified 823

2022-11-10

We would all hope so, indeed we should demand so, since nurses need numerical ability in order to get the decimal point in the right place when administering drugs to patients - who may well not think (for any number of reasons) to check their work in this department.

Startlingly, some experienced nursing professionals, writing in the Daily Sceptic, fear that nursing numeracy cannot at all be taken for granted.

"When George Orwell’s Big Brother in Nineteen Eighty-Four taught that two plus two equals five, the point was that authoritarians can make people believe something they know to be untrue. If nurses are innumerate, a pandemic can be presented with whatever numbers that the Government wants to induce fear and compliance"

"Don't be ridiculous!" I hear you say, but - "How many trotted out the mantra about the COVID-19

2022-11-09

I hate to keep banging this drum but whilst the powers-that-be continue, so must we.

The Daily Sceptic brings up a useful article (actually one among several in today's email) which reviews the reasons why some people may not be too keen on Covid vaccines, or even on vaccines in general.

Vaccines have the distinction that they are a class of medical interventions that are routinely given to healthy people who are not sick - yet they pose risks to health that every authority acknowledges, in principle if not in practice.

This means that any justification for such an approach must rely on good statistics properly and very carefully (it's a minefield for experts, let alone the man on the Clapham omnibus) gathered and analysed over the requisite period of time. This was clearly not practicable for the Covid shots

2022-11-08

ICAN draws attention to another side-effect of the jabs in kids - Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). Whilst similar to the flu and not normally problematic, RSV can be serious in the "very young".

Not that that has been recognised by the regulatory authorities...

Read the ICAN Legal Update.

2022-11-05

"I will praise You, for I am fearfully, wonderfully made; Your works are marvellous and my heart perceives it well" - Psalm 139:14 (The Keys of the Kingdom Holy Bible)

Just now though many people are not feeling quite so wonderfully made, for all sorts of reasons - poor nutrition, misguided lifestyle, impact of toxins of all kinds, allergies, you name it.

Speaking personally, I only turned my own health around when I realised that I needed to start forming my own judgements and making my own health decisions. After all, my doctor's role is to inform and advise, not to decide - that's my job! I haven't looked back, except in some relief that things turned out so well and happily, so quickly.

(44 minutes)

2022-11-04

Including who was in charge of the pandemic response, apparently.

Of course the lead was taken by America, but evidence has been uncovered that the Anthony Fauci - Deborah Birx duality was not in charge.

It seems that the legal situation was changed, effectively by presidential fiat:

"An astonishing Government document dated March 13th 2020 ... reveals that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies... but rather by the National Security Council"

"The NSC does not include as regular attendees any representatives from public health related agencies"

"... on March 18th 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – which comprises the CDC, NIAID, NIH and other ... agencies – had no official leadership role in pandemic response"

"On

2022-11-03

And now for something completely different: 

"a new poll finds large parts of the public clamouring for new restrictions this winter. As many as 42% back the return of social distancing, while 20% want to reimpose the Rule of Six immediately and over 60% want mask mandates back on public transport"

A dark winter indeed!

I have to wonder about this poll's selection criteria. Was it properly randomised? Did it include the appropriate percentage of small business owners (for example)? And perhaps MPs? Certainly the fearful and well-off seem to be very well represented.

"A YouGov survey this week shows the same lingering authoritarianism"

Are we all doomed?

...

2022-11-01

Bio-labs are in the news again, this time reportedly at our very own Imperial College, London.

IC have denied the "gain of function" accusation, but in that case it's not at all clear what the purpose of the project was:

"Imperial defended its research. A spokesperson said: 'This government-backed research used viruses no more pathogenic than those already circulating within the population and will provide crucial insights that support government decision-making on how to manage the pandemic"

Surely in these matters, in order to maintain public trust, transparency is essential, especially in times when a not inconsiderable portion of the public already have considerable distrust in both IC and the government.

Technocracy News and Trends

2022-11-01

MEP Mislav Kolakušić (Croatia) challenges our little grey cells... but where is Hercule Poirot when we need him?

(91 seconds)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2022-10-30

Wear masks, don't wear masks, lock down, don't lock down, social distance etc etc.

Now the Daily Sceptic tells us how those who hope we have short memories are trying to spin away the blame.

It wasn't the non-pharmaceutical interventions that did the damage, but the fear of the virus... so it was our fault for believing the incessant fear-mongering?

If this wasn't published in a reputable journal (!) I would think it a well-timed way over-the-top outrageous spoof, but these days one has to move with the times and recognise that what passes for politics is actually just attempted mind-control. If the peasants are revolting against it, then mind-control harder!

Or have I flipped and become mentally incoherent in a totally unwarranted search for the last vestiges of sanity, where

2022-10-28

Or, to put it another way, even if they don't kill or disable you, you still are not out of the woods.

"New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the heart of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths"

But is this really an effect of the Covid infection, as those who can see no vaccine harm under any circumstances might suggest? Not so fast...

"... even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021"

The Daily Sceptic brings us

2022-10-26

The Daily Sceptic highlights some official data that demonstrates exactly why we (and our friends and acquaintances) should perhaps be leery of getting any more jabs.

No conspiracy theories, no dubious medicos that want to plough their own furrow, no unauthorised data sources.

"Information like this seems to me to be the kind of thing people are looking for, particularly now as they become increasingly hesitant about getting ever more shots of vaccine"

A useful article that many of us could perhaps adapt to meet our own needs to communicate within our circles.

Useful not just  because it provides a handle on the effectiveness of the treatment, but also because it highlights a respectable practical and superior

2022-10-24

Today's debate in Parliament on the safety of the jabs.

Readers will form their own conclusions about the level of interest that MPs in general display on this topic.

Starting with what some may consider a totally complacent presentation on behalf of the official position, this debate does include some well argued points presented by those MPs who made the effort to attend:

"Let's look at the facts, and not just be beholden to the MHRA... " 

"The Government seems to be in denial about the risks from these vaccines"

"The Government refuses to provide specialist help for these vaccine victims"

"Many people now would not touch a booster with a barge-pole - and I include myself amongst those... "

"Large numbers of doctors and health

2022-10-22

The title sounds a bit melodramatic, but in the light of

(a) the microscopically insignificant risk of Covid-19 to babies, toddlers, and children of all ages, and 

(b) the vastly higher risk of horrible adverse events including but not limited to death, blindness, heart problems, cancers, and almost any other ailment you can think of...

I recommend that this article should be taken very seriously.

See also the view from the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance.

Look at it this way:

What is the upside possibility of benefit?

2022-10-21

Christine Anderson (Germany), Francesca Donata (Italy), Ivan Vilibor Sinčić (Croatia), Stasys Jakeliūnas (Lithuania), Cristian Terhes (Romania) lay out the lies for us in all their pathetic detail.

Wonderful to see that there are MEPs still determined to tell the truth despite all official obfuscation denial and discouragement.

Their presentation of the truth regardless of whom they may upset is outstanding. True and fearless democrats all.

(40 minutes)

2022-10-20

"the MHRA set out an excellent plan for safety monitoring of the Covid vaccines which was required because of the minimal safety data from trials and the planned extensive rollout"

After two years, they are well overdue. Did they send them by rail? By Carrier Pigeon?

"The only publications from the MHRA in the last two years on safety have been the Yellow Card reports and even these do not divulge the number of people affected or the seriousness of the reports"

HART (the Health Advisory and Recovery Team) wants answers, but I'd bet a pound to a penny that none will be forthcoming.

"Where are these weekly analyses of GP data, proactive surveys of the vaccinated and academic studies of large medical databases? We’re approaching two years into the rollout – where are all these promised reports? And why is no one apart from HART and a smattering of others asking these

2022-10-16

If Clif High and Martin Geddes deal with the spirituality of the individual, does that spirituality of a group of individuals create a spirituality of the crowd?

Certainly there is evidence that a group can work as one in surprising ways - we only have to consider the movements of a shoal of fish or a murmuration of starlings to understand that the individuals in the group are not synchronised by eyesight or sound or any of the usual senses, so is a similar phenomenon discernible in humans?

The Pulse brings us up to date with some startling research that should make us sit up and pay attention:

"as we practice heart coherence and radiate love and compassion, our

2022-10-14

It has been apparent since around May 2020 to many that the NHS is a captured institution that now works for "big pharma".

Anyone that still believes that it works for us should read this testimony, from a nurse who, in the end, could no longer square her employment with her conscience.

This is her letter of resignation.

If the NHS continues on this course, it will surely collapse.

2022-10-07

This is a must-read update from Debi Evans, courtesy of UK Column, that brings us up to date with the maulings/reorganisations that our "much loved" NHS offerings are shortly to suffer/introduce.

As seemingly always nowadays, the emphasis is on removing the need for anybody to actually see anybody in the physical world, replacing the familiar Doctor's waiting room with a plethora of unfamiliar digital access mechanisms that ensure that you will probably never again see the same person twice. Indeed you yourself will no longer be a person, just an avatar in a metaverse watching an advice video, speaking with an AI, or (if lucky) another avatar.

Do read on (deep dive!), you won't want to miss this historic update.

2022-10-06

The NHS has always come in for a certain amount of stick, and some suggest that if a service is free at the point of use then it will inevitably be overwhelmed because the means of rationing a finite resource is simply moved from money to queuing. 

Others think that anything organised by "the government" is bound to fall over sooner or later due to both ever-changing political meddling and management by a remote multi-layered bureaucracy in semi-perpetual reorganisation. There is obvious truth in this - when did you ever hear about a shortage of NHS managers? Or about a new government that didn't have some pet scheme to "fix the NHS"?

In past times when I used to knock on doors to campaign for Brexit, I was "treated" to some horrific stories of those who had been unable to access any sensible treatment from the NHS. I wasn't specifically talking about the NHS but these stories came out anyway. 

Have things improved since then?

...