Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
Trump to Face Down Putin and BRICS?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 715
2025-01-23
Has Trump overreached himself?
Does picking a fight with President Putin bring peace in the Ukraine any closer?
Does imposing tariffs on the BRICS solve the problem of the weakening US dollar?
Set against Trump's history of coming back from the brink, these moves look odd. Nevertheless, he isn't negotiating with the opposition here, he is more likely setting the mood music for the guidance of US opinion.
"Everything that Trump's doing is just completely contradictory"
So, perhaps he is just making a lot of noise that the BRICS know amounts to very little ... but maybe elements within the US do not.
Or perhaps his primary target is China, whose current exports to the US are probably too large for them to lose on day one to tariffs, so they may need to reduce their prices temporarily whilst they seek alternative markets (and the US seeks alternative suppliers) - nevertheless the prices paid for such imported goods by US consumers would likely rise to some extent.
" ... that's not going to happen because in order to reindustrialise, you have to take down Wall Street ... you can serve the financial sector or you can serve the manufacturing sector, they are antagonistic, you cannot have both ... "
See what you think ...
(1 ht 55 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
Whitty - Not What You Thought He Was?
- Details
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 748
2025-01-23
"Chris Whitty ... told the Covid Inquiry this week that the decision to mandate Covid jabs was “100 per cent a political one” and he was "sceptical" of it"
"Has the public health establishment at least learned something from the last few years?"
If nothing else, these last few years have permitted the "public health establishment" in all its varied forms to demonstrate that they are totally immune to all criticism, whether justified or not. Immune even to the Nuremberg Codes that declared unequivocally that anybody to be subjected to a medical experiment must be (a) fully informed of the risks (b) free to decline to take part. They were coerced at every turn into taking an experimental intervention described as a "vaccine" which was in fact a largely untested gene therapy that turned out to confer no stoppage of onward transmission and negligible effective benefit of immunity. And there are reports that the whole process was managed not by the medical authorities but by the military.
The other principle established at Nuremberg was that "obeying orders" was not a sufficient defence in law.
Continuing denials can only take them so far.
We await - no, we demand - the necessary prosecutions.
Justice must be seen to be done.
Stargate - Not What You Think?
- Details
- Category: Health
- Hits: 796
2025-01-22
From the name itself, one might think of UFOs / UAPs, or some science-fiction portal concept. The truth seems to be more prosaic, but just as topical and probably just as much misunderstood:
AI
Conspiracy Sarah asks the relevant question - what could (possibly) go wrong?
Does Trump believe this stuff?
Or is he indulging his favoured tactic of putting likely miscreants squarely into the limelight for investigation by the public? And if he isn't, it's a good bet that there will be no shortage of public volunteers who will oblige anyway, given the current reputation of the mRNA shots for Covid.
I guess we will know soon enough, but mRNA doesn't sound remotely promising, even allied with AI. Especially allied with AI.
But there again, it's a way to get new data centres built for AI that will have many more likely uses than fancy "shots for cancer". For a start, the NWO fanatics will need them for monitoring and control of the new global internet of human slaves ...
Trump Created the Gaza Ceasefire - What Now?
- Details
- Category: Defence
- Hits: 773
2025-01-22
Scott Ritter reviews the state of play in the Middle East for the Schiller Institute.
It's complicated, but the current situation, whilst not solving the immediate problem, may open additional options ...
(11 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
UK Parliament Doubles Down on Climate and Nature Bill?
- Details
- Category: Green
- Hits: 852
2025-01-22
Tomorrow is the second reading that the Green Blob hopes will send the Climate and Nature Bill speeding its way toward the Statute Book.
So what will it mean for the legendary man on the Clapham Omnibus?
" ... Parliament is due to vote on a Private Member’s Bill that could lead to mass starvation, widespread disease and fatalities and the almost certain collapse of civil liberties and society within a few years"
Is that all? And here I was thinking that it might be serious.
"The bill is a thinly-disguised attempt using meaningless climate and nature crisis verbosity to ration and control almost everything that citizens consume"
Well, my parents had to cope with rationing and much else in WW2 (and beyond), and we survived that ...
"It appears that a near 90% reduction in hydrocarbon use within a decade is sought and this would affect everything from the energy that heats homes and drives a modern economy to the medicines and food that sustains life"
Our food distribution chains are more or less totally dependent upon diesel lorries, so that explains one cause of rationing - it won't be physically possible to move more than 10% of the food that currently gets handled. Can we survive on eating one day out of 10? On the plus side it might make a dent in the obesity crisis.
"People would freeze in winter, there would be no food in the shops or medicines in the hospitals and pharmacies. There would be no power to run sewage treatment plants or hydrocarbon-based chemicals to clean the water. A complete breakdown of law and order would be likely as citizens survive as best they can"
Most of us rely on gas currently for our heating - even those with heat pumps need electricity to run them (currently dependent on gas because no matter how many windmills and solar panels are installed, no wind / no sunshine = no power), so perhaps we can only heat our homes and cook our meals on one day in ten (if the wind happens to blow on the right day)?
And no diesel = no ambulances, so the NHS will have 10% of its previous arrivals to A&E, which might alleviate the insane queuing and trolleying I suppose.
"The bill is short on figures ... "
You don't say!
"But this is not the end of the story since the bill mandates that an account must be taken of emissions released by all UK imports ... "
OK, I give in, this is madness; we get much of our imports from China, who are not going to restrain their fossil fuel consumption for anybody, and even if we do hit net zero (excluding imports) we could never make up for the carbon footprint of the Chinese imports that arrive even if we could measure them, so these objectives obviously cannot be physically implemented.
Maybe our MPs might glance surreptitiously across the Atlantic to see how our brethren of the "Special Relationship" will be holding up their end of the measures to confront the Climate Crisis?
Page 128 of 315
