Featured

Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser

The Law to be Applied to the BBC

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 17 December 2025; Hits: 596

2025-12-17

Did the BBC always suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Well, it probably does now. The Donald is suing them in Florida for defamation, and potentially for trying to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election. For $Billions. Nobody can say how much just yet as it may include punitive damages if sufficient intent is proven. Which doesn't seem unlikely to me.

Of course whatever damages are awarded, getting that much money out of the BBC might be an international issue, and affect whether the BBC can survive in its current format. If uptake of the licence fee is any indication, the Great British Public is already voting by closing their wallets, so finance is likely an issue.

"For perhaps the first time, the BBC will face a legal process in which discovery is compulsory. Panorama producers and editors will have to surrender emails, messages, ... "

Of course, it's open to the UK press and media to not bother to cover the case of the century - after all, who is this jumped-up president who doesn't even seem to be in charge of his own political party half the time?

Still, in this age of too easy / too much communication, I suspect that the details will out ...

The Law as Applied in the UK for Operation Talla

Details: Category: Covid; Published: 16 December 2025; Hits: 383

2025-12-16

Operation Talla as investigated by Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) and reported by Mark Sexton has had the effect of preventing the operation of Justice in the UK, by the expedient of censoring the reporting of certain alleged high crimes and misdemeanours.

This article follows on from our earlier report.

Such action by the police (possibly supported by others) has exposed our executive government as a lawless organisation that has deliberately and almost certainly illegally (I am not a lawyer!) denied justice to the people.

However you look at it, the allegations suppressed were so serious that justice had to be seen to be done. Even by setting up the Covid Enquiry, the government effectively ensured that it was marking its own homework.

Far from Justice being seen to be done by an independent judiciary, Justice has very clearly been seen to have been suppressed.

This is not over until the root cause has been identified and justice has been served.

When the separation of powers is sidelined, impartial justice is abandoned and we are ruled by an unaccountable government.

Ian Clayton (Ethical Approach UK) has drawn up documents that expose the problem, together with proposals to mitigate the problem. Whatever we think of these proposals, they deserve careful study.

Whilst it's not clear that any part of the State will be willing to oblige, it is therefore up to the public, and those genuinely independent bodies that remain.

Documents list:

The Tor Garnett Correspondence
Forensic Analysis of the Tor Garnett Letter
Situational Position NPCC/Operation Talla 10 Dec 2025
R v Dytham 1979 Court of Appeal
What really happened to CRIME NUMBER 6029679/21
Forensic report on undated national communication by ACC Owen Weatherill to Chief Constables & Force Duty Gold Officers under OP TALLA

Blueprint Proposal for PIA and PPS

Zipped archive of all of the above

The Law of the World - Routinely Broken?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 16 December 2025; Hits: 239

2025-12-16

" ... there are four international universal crimes that can be committed ... we brought those into English law and we added the bit about 'aiding and abetting' .... "

Likewise for aiding and abetting 'terrorism'.

So how to enforce the law? Is ignorance of the law a defence in Court if we were never told about that law?

Are we now dug into a hole so deep complex and opaque that it has become impossible - even perhaps for our national leadership - to obey the law?

"Our MPs and Ministers are never told the truth about the international agreements and laws that apply to the waging of war ... "

Or would they just lie about it anyway?

"Not only is tax immoral, it's also unnecessary ... "

Oh I say! Steady on. That's another topic altogether ...

Neil Oliver investigates ...

(47 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

Read up about:

The Recognition of Trusts Act 1987,
The International Criminal Court Act 2000,
The Terrorism Act 2000.

Medical Sleight of Logic?

Details: Category: Free Citizen; Published: 15 December 2025; Hits: 590

2025-12-15

The Brownstone Institute wades in where lesser mortals fear to tread - on the toes of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

We have mentioned before the view that Big Pharma may not always have been scrupulously honest with us.

Now the Brownstone Institute (surely a name that simply exudes probity integrity and moral rectitude?) weighs in with their views on vaccinology, and finds it, well, less than persuasive.

As always, it falls to us to be the judge of such matters.

Testing, Testing, 1 2 3 , Testing

Details: Category: Health; Published: 15 December 2025; Hits: 239

2025-12-15

Covid for me was the definitive eye-opener.

What purpose did the tests serve? To identify a "case", or to persuade you that you were (OMG!) infected with consequences too awful to contemplate?

Search as I might, I could not find any published information about the accuracy of the test. Cue "What if it isn't very accurate?" ... "What if it's actually a psy-op and will give you false positives galore - who's to know?"

"They wouldn't do that ... would they?"

So I looked at the stats - official stats - showing that the deaths were largely among the old with comorbidities, at around their expected lifespan ... and deaths overall were staying within normal statistical expectation ... until 2021 broke alongside the quaxxine campaigns.

"Yes, they do seem to be doing that".

And now for my personal anecdote that proves nothing but is all of a piece ...

Having fallen down the stairs a few years ago (2015) and been carted off (against my better judgement, it now seems) to spend a very unwelcome sleepless night in A&E "for my safety", that event kicked off a cascade of tests and investigations, including an MRI scan of my head, all designed to prove that I was about to die of something.

As luck would have it, they didn't find anything that would have caused my accident, but "coincidentally" they found a "nodule" that "shouldn't have been there". "Nothing to worry about, just come back in a year for another MRI to see if it's growing". This I did for several years, Each time they would cluster around the monitor and measure this "nodule" on screen, a nodule that I over their shoulders could never identify from amongst its surroundings. Well, they were probably more practised at this than I.

Then one year, it was "really time to operate now, before it grows any bigger". So I asked for a written risk assessment, which frankly wasn't reassuring, featuring a high probability of resulting facial paralysis ... So I demurred for another year.

What a difference a year makes! "No need to operate yet, it's fine for now".

Hang on, last year it was "Let's go, pass me the scalpels!". Staff continuity didn't seem to be their strong point.

Then Covid arrived. I drew the only sensible conclusion and cancelled all further investigation.

And 5 years later here I still am, nodule or no nodule, still upright and intact, but with a healthy disrespect for all matters NHS. Well not quite all - I've been picked up as a roadside casualty and had minor abrasions patched up, something that they are seemingly good at, but I declined their offer to admit me overnight "to be safe", much preferring to enjoy my safety in the familiar surroundings of home.

There is more, but I won't digress further, beyond saying that I got off very lightly.

Some do not. Caveat emptor - especially when it's "free at the point of use" (but hideously expensive at the point of taxation).

Page 60 of 385