Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
"If you’ve suffered loss or injury because of Covid Measures in the UK, you may have a claim against the UK Government for causing these harms" (cacuk.uk)
Mina Dew explains the legal case to UNN's Anthony Webber.
"Their case is different from other Covid cases. First, they challenge the pretext of a pandemic, based on available mortality data. They also highlight that the government's "response" always assumed vaccination was the answer. They challenge that assumption too!
"As well as seeking compensation and declaratory relief, they want to use this case to effect positive changes in our laws and in society, specifically:
"To prove that vaccines must never be mandatory (they are “unavoidably unsafe” according to US...
Independent longstanding journalist Seymour Hersch claims the laurels for the first definitive description of how the culprits took down the Nordstream 2 pipeline... and who they were.
Also the incoming war with China, events in Haiti, and - boosting Australia!
(1 hr 20 minutes)
Del Bigtree of the Highwire summarises the state of America in the wake of the Covid experience, all in less than 15 minutes! Don't blink or you'll miss something.
In so doing he speaks for many around the world, and readers will note that the UK experience has paralleled the US more or less in lockstep, in certain areas less rigorously applied, but to substantially the same effect.
John Rappaport is a journalist of very longstanding.
John doesn't take prisoners (which is why no "reputable" mainstream media will publish his work).
The greek text of Revelation 18/23 uses the greek word φαρμακεία (pharmakeia) to indicate "sorcery".
Sorcery isn't merely a magical art - it is also the art of deception (as any stage magician will testify).
Speaking of "Babylon, the mighty city", Revelation 18/23 prophesies her destruction, listing all the inhabitants who will be extinguished, finishing with:
"Russia ... DIRECTLY accuses the US of being responsible for the creation and release of Covid-19"
"Russia clarifies they have record of over 16,000 biological samples, including blood and serum samples, transported from Ukraine to the US, Georgia, European countries"
"Sounds exactly like ... the US have been producing biological weapons to ethnically cleanse certain individuals of select genome sequences"
"Russia says this activity gives reasonable cause to question US military biologists in the emergence and spread of the COVID-19 pathogen"
Clandestine's newsletter brings us up to date with the latest findings from the Russian military.
None of it is absolutely definitive, but if the cap fits...
Ever since the first 5G-equipped cruise ships docked in Japan with cases of Covid-19, those of us who were alert to the fact that some people are adversely affected by wireless radiation were wondering if these facts were linked.
That suspicion was reinforced when it was reported that Wuhan had turned on its 5G systems at around the same time that the Covid-19 outbreak there first came to global attention.
And finally, a New York doctor made a video where he was saying that the official protocol for Covid-19 patients didn't work because the "pneumonia" wasn't like normal pneumonia where the lungs were filling up - the lungs were remaining dry but the blood oxygenation was still deficient. Not pneumonia then but pneumonitis - a recognised symptom of radiation exposure.
So what to make of it all?
Here is a video made by an independent researcher/tech-nerd who had nothing better to do during the early lockdowns -...
AKA Move along please, nothing to see here...
Like / Dislike this video here.
"The Truth About the Covid-19 Pandemic from Within the NHS (Ex Director of End of Life Care at one of the Largest Hospital Trusts in the UK)"
This is a first hand account of the unfolding Covid-19 pandemic from an NHS employee.
It makes for fascinating reading.
"In 2016, the British government proposed and piloted a change to the process of how deaths were certified across all hospitals in the UK"
"The MCCD states the cause of death"
"The only definitive way of determining a ... cause of death is to refer the deceased patient to HM Coroner (if certain criteria are met), for HM Coroner to accept and take on the case, resulting in a Post Mortem"
"... the government would now hire and pay one Medical Examiner, to sit in every hospital and write all MCCDs...
“All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated”
Which rather begs the question: "On whose advice did the minister take these decisions?". Surely not without advice from its own regulators?
Given that the MHRA are supposedly responsible for regulating new medical products and that the JCVI have their own say somewhere in the mix, it probably isn't exactly clear in the minds of the public exactly where the dividing lines are/were drawn.
So it must be good to see that some clarity is (perhaps slowly) being uncovered via FOI requests to shed light on this obfuscation of...
Lots of questions, but it'snot so much what he says, as what he doesn't say.
In some interviews, body language is all.
I guess that people will just have to keep making these videos until the penny drops and the public takes matters into their own hands.
Like / Dislike this video here.
UK Column News Monday 16 January.
UK Column leads with more medically-qualified testimony.
How long before MPs can question the narrative before being thrown out of their party?
At 28 minutes: Public Order Bill
At 33 minutes: 'Wellbeing' in Scotland
At 44 minutes: Tanks for you know where
At 65 minutes: Sanctions on Iran
If you think you understand our world, then you are wrong.
Vaccines are matter for medical regulators, right?
"the informed consent rules have been amended under Obama - subjects don't have to be informed of what's going on if it is deemed not in their best interests"
I wonder who does the deeming here?
We don't have any emergency but they keep extending it because they need it to bypass all the normal medical rules.
Doctors for Covid Ethics 5th Symposium - if it isn't here, it probably doesn't exist.
I won't attempt to summarise - suffice it to say that whatever you want to know, its here somewhere, and if it's not here then it's in an earlier symposium!
As always, he makes the unanswerable case.
Our MPs are complicit in their absence. They are complicit in the ongoing fake vaccination programme, even though there is clearly no cause for it that has not been long discredited.
Will they be complicit in the next restrictions?
We need to go back to first principles.
What will it take?
"Mr. Najadi, himself and his family fully jabbed and boostered, describes his realization that the entire narrative, especially regarding vaccine efficacy, is based on contradictions, misleading and unsupported claims and perhaps malicious intent"
"He trusts the Swiss judicial system, is confident that the Truth will come to light, and sends a message of hope that justice will indeed prevail"
Reiner Fuellmich continues his work with the ICIC.
"This is the most important case that I can imagine..."
The correlation between excess deaths and certain vaccine roll-outs has been asserted by a number of independent observers during 2022, only to be met by an extraordinary wall of silence from the official bodies who we have always assumed are charged with maintaining the health of the nations.
The first rule of statistics is that "correlation does not prove causation", although some may unhelpfully shorten that to the similar-sounding but fundamentally different "correlation is not causation".
Correlation may well indicate causation - or it may not. Of itself it is unlikely to stand in a court of law as sole proof of causation, but it neither does it deny causation.
So from the point of view of a regulatory body, correlation warrants further investigation - no ifs, no buts.
Similar correlations across several nations enormously strengthens the case for further investigation.
The Covid argument has become mired in emotional warfare - in fact, it was always so enmired from the beginning.
Nevertheless, even if we merely make the general pedantic safety case for the introduction of any new product you can think of, there is an established approach to ensuring that the product introduction will not cause excessive problems through being unsafe, and ensuring that any such (inevitable in the general case) problems will be mitigated rather than exaggerated. Fail-safe is a watchword for a reason.
Martin Geddes reviews the Covid Vaccine roll-out history from this viewpoint alone, and asks whether the normal type of precautions (such as might be appropriate for any commercial product, let alone the major pharmaceutical product of the century) were applied with due care.
It's abundantly clear that they were...
Come on guys, this is 1st January, not 1st April!
And of course, nothing like this could be possibly be happening in the UK could it?
No no, of course not, that would be too ridiculous for words.
Good if belated news - more medicos are accepting that the vaccines are more dangerous than the disease, and calling for them to be stopped.
Dr John Campbell, who strikes me as an honest man trapped for years within our brainwashing system of NHS big pharma big government collusion, has caught up with the facts as we knew them many months ago.
Yet yes, there is truly more joy in Heaven over one sinner that repents than over ninety and nine just men - welcome to the club John Campbell, your example will encourage others to reconsider, until the truth becomes generally accepted.
At that point the understanding of the causes of the absurd demonisation of the unvaxxed can begin.
Page 7 of 36