The Unelected

2021-06-23

Invading aliens from the Planet Zog?

Unspeakable creatures from the Ocean Depths?

Monstrous insects from unsuspected underground hatcheries, primed to emerge in terrifying numbers at midnight on the next full moon?

What could be more scary?

Well, indulge me for a moment in my flight of fancy, for I propose a more scary story yet...

Imagine if you will a scenario where we live comfortable lives in a supportive world, a world where we feel safe and competent to carry out our daily routines, cocooned within a familiar community, managed by benevolent authorities, our life plans progressing as expected. More or less. Which is pretty much the story for most of us in the UK for the last half century. (We should perhaps in passing remind ourselves that it was not always thus - in the preceding half century we had fought two world wars, and in that same half

2021-06-28

I think it was in the days of Tony Blair that I first heard the term "stakeholder" applied to corporate / political affairs. I didn't properly understand it then because it was not an obvious fit with the standard shareholder - employer - employee - customer - lender paradigm, and it wasn't until later that I came to assume that that was the point - it permitted the elites to waffle on about various things political and financial(ie: our future) without most of us having the understanding to challenge their "argument".

Together with the acquiescence (or worse) of the journalists of the time, this helped them get on and do whatever they wanted without the associated inconvenient popular outcry.

Now that the idea of a greedy-minded elite is gaining ground (certain large banking organisations being openly known as "giant vampire squid"

Stealth Network from Amazon?

2021-06-17

Dr Peter McCullough introduces himself (eventually!) and describes how he has been trying to counter the official Covid narrative and provide early intervention to Covid sufferers, with the objective of obviating the need for them to be taken into hospital.

"My quick analysis is that we are under the application of a form of bio-terrorism, that's world-wide, that appears to have been many years in the planning, and the first wave of the bio-terrorism is a respiratory virus that spread across the world and affected... about 1% of many populations, but generated great fear"

"... every single thing that was done in the public health response to the pandemic made it worse"

"... what we have discovered is that the suppression of early treatment was tightly linked to the development of a vaccine... and the entire programme... was really all about keeping the

2021-06-13

Give us the money and all the authority we could (and will) ask for, then we can save the world! What could possibly go wrong?

" ... you will not find one mention of any aspect of a political system in Brave New World - not one! There was no government, there was just 'scientific' management - this is the mind-set of these people - you don't need government, you don't need representation of people, you don't need a constitution... "

Is this not exactly the mindset of those 'scientists' that are currently working our politicians strings?

We have mentioned this proposal before but this video covers more ground:

 

2021-06-05

We have reported on this case earlier - in short, when Dr Shiva was running for elected office in Nov 2020 he was deplatformed by Twitter. He went to court:

"Following the deplatforming of Dr.SHIVA, testimony and hearings in Federal court elicited how government and Twitter have created an infrastructure for government to launder censorship of speech through Twitter"

The case continues, and those who are interested (if they do this in the States then who would like to bet that they don't do it in the UK?) can follow the case on the case web-site created by Dr Shiva, who is representing himself (I guess he wants the job done properly and to his satisfaction).

Dr

2021-06-02

Never before have the world's governments contrived - with the aid of global institutions such as the UN, the WHO, global NGOs such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and global corporate interests such as the big pharmaceutical companies - to destroy the existing economic and political order on a global scale through the apparent use of lies, misinformation, double-speak, fear, confusion, and outright in-your-face censorship.

It is perfectly clear that we are no longer living in ordinary times.

New concepts of nebulous clarity (such as "hate speech") have been proposed and indeed  written into law.

New legislation is proposed to counter "on-line harms", to enable censorship to be applied to on-line publishing of hitherto perfectly legal material.

An alleged pandemic (that nobody would recognise without the now infamous test) has been used to strip citizens across the globe of their historic rights

2021-05-30

The RT-PCR test for Covid-19 is said by some to create false positive results if run for too many cycles.

The labs who run the tests have been reluctant to disclose how many amplification cycles they use.

There have been reports that upwards of 35 or even 40 cycles have been used.

But now, Zerohedge reports that the CDC has published guidance that for vaccinated people, no more than 28 cycles (download) should be used. But wait - is this test not a standardised test? Perhaps the CDC is at last catching up with the situation and laying down a welcome and much-needed standard, but surely a standard is a standard and should apply across the

2021-05-21

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released a report calling for more of everything for itself: more authority, a global surveillance system, and billions more in financing.

More accurately, the report,entitled COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic, is released by The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness & Response which was commissioned by the WHO.

"It reports to the WHO Governing Bodies, and not to the WHO"

The Co-chairs were selected by the WHO Director-General and these co-chairs then selected the eleven panel members.

Perhaps not so independent then. So who is

2021-04-24

"we spend a billion pounds a year and we get back articles"

"if you control access to the scientific literature, it is to all intents and purposes, like controlling science"

"who is looking after scientific integrity?"

"... of all the scientific literature that is published, surely the medical journals must be the most rigorous"

"... the peer review system is so weak that we really can't trust what's going on out there in the medical literature"

Who are the "key opinion leaders", the "trusted voices" and "trusted interlocutors"?

"in addition, you want to work with the private sector and those who are spreading information generally, to see that they can bring things down that are in fact lies or false information that is put forward, as a way

2021-01-17

Ice Age Farmer analyses the ownership of America's farmland, and examines what these owners intend to accelerate in terms of farming innovation.

The UK Government's role in similarly modifying our own farming landscape also gets a mention.

What do you think about it?

2020-12-22

If you have been wondering about who is pulling the strings behind the greatest incoming global reconfiguration of our lives, and probably of the century, then this is your chance to get to "know thine enemy".

If you want to know about the "Great Reset" (synonyms: "Sustainable Development", "Green New Deal", "UN Agenda 2030"), where it came from and how we got here, and more importantly where we are going, you probably can't do better than listen to James Delingpole interview Patrick Wood (an expert in the Trilateral Commission) who has spent many years investigating the Technocracy movement which started out in the US in the 1930s.

Necessarily this is a deep dive, but a mine of information. Unmissable!

"this is the biggest intellectual sham of history"

"read the UN Agenda 2030

2020-12-14

The Mail on Sunday broke a story this weekend that might give us all pause for thought - and it's not reds under the beds, it's red Chinese in all manner of British and world corporations and institutions, including many household names, not only in the UK.

"This investigation proves that members of the Chinese Communist Party are now spread around the globe, with members working for some of the world's most important multinational corporations, academic institutions and our own diplomatic services"

"Responding to the findings, an alliance of 30 MPs last night said they would be tabling an urgent question about the issue in the Commons"

We know that China has been courting international investment for many years in an effort to educate its workforce in modern

2020-12-12

What is Systemic Corruption?

The American Institute for Economic Research publishes a piece that dares to mention the unmentionable - the possibility that entire systems of government can be corrupt from the top down.

That's a most unwelcome thought as it puts our previous world-view under the microscope and threatens to have us re-evaluate our long-standing assumptions about the way in which we are governed. Surely in a democracy systemic corruption is impossible?

Well is it?

Many of the world's institutions are not democratic. The UN, the WHO, the WEF, the many mega-corporations now global in their reach are all unelected, as are the many "not for profit" global charities and philanthropic outfits and "think tanks" that we read about daily in our newspapers.

The AIER

2020-12-11

When the pandemic subsided in June and deaths became "normal" again, many of us thought that it was all over.

Not so fast! Deprived of their death statistics, the newspapers and governments world-wide simply transferred their attention to "cases", a suspect figure depending solely on a positive result from the now famous PCR Test.

Medical tests are normally applied at the request of a physician in order to confirm or exclude a suspected diagnosis, but today we see a frantic effort to apply it to all and sundry as widely as possible and to regard every positive result as an infection.

I won't rehearse these arguments yet again here, but a result of this strategy is that:

if the PCR Test should not be worthy of the trust that is currently accorded it, then the pandemic narrative is rebutted in short order.

Now "we all

2020-12-10

“A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. It wasn’t the world being round that agitated people, but that the world wasn’t flat.
When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic”
— (Perhaps) Donald James

1. Some think that the present election turmoil in the United States is just the usual American over-the-top way of doing things.
2. That it happens to coincide with an unrelated pandemic which governments around the world are mishandling to a quite extraordinary degree is just the way things are.
3. That coincidentally the World Economic Forum, the UN, the Central Banks all talking about a "Great Reset" is another unrelated exercise.
4. And that elected (and maybe unelected) leaders around the world are suddenly all with

2020-12-09

If it looks too good to be true, it probably is.

It's an old adage, but an adage that has stood the test of time.

Will "the vaccine" stand the test of time?

Drs Wodarg and Yeadon don't like what they see and "filed an application with the EMA, the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42)."

Good luck with that one - as time passes and we study the statistics we can see that the pandemic is primarily political rather than medical in nature, which to my tainted mind almost certainly means that no good will come of it.

Page 39 of 40