The Unelected

2022-12-31

A slightly facetious title for this article, but in principle, could this be next?

Elon Musk is confounding the FBI (and who knows who else?!) with his revelations from the Twitter Files, but he is also apparently providing YNH (Yuval Noah Harari) and Klaus Schwab with the technology to link our brains into "the cloud" - whatever that may be we don't know, but it's sure to involve the latest AI technology.

OK, certainly it will be used to good effect in enabling the disabled to function again, but when we start talking about augmenting our thinking, we can readily envisage a much darker scenario.

Could we actually control such technology? Clearly there would have to be limits inbuilt. When does augmentation morph into ever more powerful brainwashing, and ultimately into outright control? 

It's not hard to think that our bodies might become little more than robotic extensions of the system, in which case why

2022-12-30

Stop World Control posits an amazing theory - but does he prove it?

And if so, what on earth is going on?

"Biological knowledge, multiplied by Computing power, multiplied by Data, gives us the ability to hack humans"

"Now we are gaining the power to create life, just like God, and in a way, we even go beyond the Biblical God"

"It sounds like the plot of a cheap science-fiction movie, but... it's... the official agenda, published and promoted, all over the world by the World Economic Forum and by their puppets in government... "

Nothing really new here, but in today's world of smoke and mirrors, it's a fascinating and useful, scary, even essential, reminder (where is James Bond when we need him?!).

I suggest however that it's as succinct presentable and informative a summary of the state of

2022-12-29

The CIB (Campaign for an Independent Britain) publishes their view on why the Northern Ireland Protocol is no more than "a sham and a deceit".

Harsh words, but apparently warranted none the less.

Surely our friends and partners across the Channel would never indulge in such measures?

Well, of course not Minister. 

2022-12-28

The evidence does seem to be mounting that the true intent and origin behind the Covid mRNA "vaccines" is quite different than we have been led to believe.

I have no direct information but here are three reports which all seem to point in a similar direction.

First up: State of the Nation bases its analysis on the American VAERS dataset, whereon anybody can report a vaccine adverse event (but maybe only < 10% do).

"It’s of paramount importance to understand that every single physician and scientist in America has access to the official government data and information posted on the VAERS website"

including "every department throughout the U.S. Federal Government, the U.S. Armed Forces and all affiliated NGOs", "every public corporation and private company, every medical center and hospital, every healthcare insurance company and risk

2022-12-27

Nothing especially new but a useful reminder of how we got here.

"The real-world data on incidence presented in that Vaccine Surveillance Report were highly suggestive of a problem that should have been prioritised for rigorous investigation, not explained away with the flick of a pen"

"UKHSA had resorted to including a stern warning in bold in its section on real-world data:

     ... These raw data should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness"

"they preferred to believe that it was the real world that was wrong and that their cleverly constructed experimental studies that were right"

"We’re now nine months from that last table of real world data on Covid infection by vaccination status, and in the meantime studies from from around the world continue to suggest that the vaccines

2022-12-26

An upbeat report indeed to end 2022 on - let us all be hopeful that Ben is not "controlled opposition".

I have to say that I put more store by his earthly reporting than his insight into off-world phenomena, fascinating those these undoubtedly are.

But it still may be true (as far as I know) that the two may turn out to be - shall we say - not independent of each other.

As for the COP15 Biodiversity Agreement, we all know by now how the UN and its agencies are skilled manipulators of ambiguous language that can be interpreted in multiple ways according to the reader's preferences. If these last years have taught us anything at all, it is that no communication from the "Great and the Good" can be taken at face value.

Still, the report that the US and the Vatican voted against it may be encouraging.

2022-12-26

This is a gentle reminder - this site covered the topic earlier in December, but another reminder is appropriate in the light of the severity of the threat.

Serious threats certainly abound (war with Russia, unrest in the Middle East, expiring power supplies courtesy of sanctions on Russia that mostly hurt Europe, ever-growing uncontrolled illegal immigration (at our considerable expense), striking unions, freezing weather ...  )

But just below the surface presented by the global news media, the World Stealth Organisation is moving laboriously on, expressing their intentions in verbiage of stultifying bureaucratic ambiguity which nobody wants to read, let alone attempt to decipher.

Yup - I'm definitely a conspiracy theorist - but remind me - who abolished conspiracies and when did that

2022-12-24

A useful update this week.

Modest subscription required.

2022-12-23

"The High Court has ruled today that the Welsh Government’s controversial plans to force LGBTQ+ teaching on all children from the age of 3 upwards is lawful and does not conflict with parental rights"

What part of this statement do we not understand?

What are the implications?

Parents in the UK have always been free to bring up our children as we see fit.

The presumption of English (and now therefore Welsh) freedom is that the State on behalf of the Crown will not interfere with the conduct of its subjects except (a) in exceptional circumstances and (b) with due authorisation, as for instance: under a court order.

Children are too young to be treated as adults, and so children are subject to the care of their parents (or failing that, of their guardians). So in the case of children it is the parent (or guardian) who carries the responsibility under the law

2022-12-23

It is well recognised that the lie is halfway around the world before the truth has put its boots on. I suppose that in this day and age we should be using an updated metaphor - perhaps that the lie has flashed through all corners of the internet before the truth has booted up it's PC and remembered its password.

Still, the parable of the hare and the tortoise also springs to mind - steady and reliable eventually triumphs over fast fancy and fleeting. The truth will out, as they say, just as soon as the inevitable inconsistencies occasioned by the lie become exposed. It's only a matter of time and perseverance.

Hence the necessity for ever more censorship by those who do not want the truth exposed. Censorship that will in the end prove inadequate to the ever-expanding task of covering up all the  inconsistencies rippling from the original lie. 

In summary - the truth

2022-12-22

In 2016 against all published expectations and in the teeth of "advice" from the massed ranks of the Great and the Good globally, the UK voted to leave the EU.

Quelle Horreur!

How could we possibly succeed without being subject to the wise instruction of the EU Commission?

Outside the infinite wisdom of the ECJ?

And above all, without the doughty rhetoric of Nigel Farage in the EU Parliament to entertain us?

What then unfolded was perhaps the most extraordinarily illuminating Parliament of political and legal contortionist thearter of modern times, which tried everything possible to appear to be leaving the EU whilst determined to remain within its control. 

Ultimately, the Great and the Good decided that the only way they could achieve that aim was to allow Boris Johnson to "take us out" in legal terms whilst taking

2022-12-20

No, not that particular Jeremy (although many may think he was secretly promoted Prime Minister a while back); this is Jeremy Farrar of SAGE, the Welcome Trust, and now right-hand "Chief Scientist" to Tedros of the WHO.

"Shortly after Xi Jinping enacted the strictest lockdown in history in Wuhan, China, and long before that lockdown produced any results, Farrar echoed his new boss, Tedros, in praising China for 'setting a new standard for outbreak response' "

I wonder if Tedros advertised the vacancy? How many applications were received? and what selection criteria were applied?

After all, the WHO is certainly financed by tax-payer dollars / pounds / euros, so should we not be told?

"Farrar is the second former SAGE member who has been rewarded by the WHO with a major promotion ... the first being