2023-04-18
Th WHO is never one to pass up an opportunity to increase its powers, and if necessary is perfectly prepared to debate and assign to itself additional powers that purport to extend its constitutional powers without reference to any democratic mandate.
" ... this constitution will be fundamentally changed by the two instruments that are in the pipeline following the Covid-19 pandemic ..."
" The WHO is domiciled in Geneva ... it's employees are exempt from tax and they and their families all have diplomatic immunity ... "
" ... it is indeed a supranational body, unelected and unaccountable"
"The original ideals of the WHO and WHA were completely laudable ... "
"Who is now funding the WHO? Like many of our regulators in the UK: The MHRA (86% funded by industry sources), the JCVI member's personal declarations declared more than £1billion of interests in big pharma, the thing it was set up to regulate ... "
"The WHO is no longer anything like majority-funded by its member states, the people it is seeking to control ... it's 86% funded by external sources ... the second-largest donor after Germany is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and GAVI is the fifth, so if we add those together they are the biggest donor to the WHO ... they are also the biggest investors in pharmaceuticals and the experimental mRNA technology ... that proved so profitable to those who proposed and produced it during the last pandemic"
" ... donors direct funding according to their priorities ... their priorities might well not be the priorities of my constituents ... or the electorate in the UK, but 'he who pays the piper calls the tune' "
"Anybody can buy influence at the WHO, it will just cost them money ... "
Words of truth indeed.
(18 minutes)
Like / Dislike this video here.
2023-04-19
2023-04-19
Full Debate:
(2 hrs 15 mins)
Like / Dislike this video here.
