EU e-Privacy Directive

This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.


Of all the preposterous ideas for explaining the rising levels of excess deaths from all causes, "Climate Change" must rank amongst the most implausible - implausible that is unless you take your opinions from "experts" and "authorities" of official kinds rather than from evidence or from genuine practitioners of the art of medicine.

UKHSA's chief doom-monger and blame-dodger Jenny Harries may of course have some sort of undisclosed special interest involved in her unstinting determination to absolutely ignore any possible national side-effect (such as excess deaths) arising from the UKHSA's unshakeable purpose to inject as many unsuspecting people (and their children who by all available statistics are at no discernible risk from the demonised virus) with an experimental gene therapy of no known long-term safety profile - although it does now have a very known inability to prevent both infection and transmission.

A therapy which incidentally comes from a company whose proven track record of fraud and deceit some might think second to none.

Official opinion seems to have an excessively high tolerance of countervailing factors.

Still, I've no idea what that special interest might be. After all, it's the MHRA which is known for being funded by fees from the companies that it is supposed to regulate, not the UKHSA.

But whatever, nothing to see here.