2022-10-07
No normie in their right mind takes a blind bit of notice of the proceedings at the WEF-United Nations, couched as they invariably are in dry and frankly turgid UN-speak, using words and phrases that seem wholly unobjectionable, even desirable, to any normal thinking person. Behind these phrases however lurk specific agendas and intentions which if spelt out would incite disbelief and fury.
The Brownstone Institute republishes a Substack article by Dr Robert Malone, who points up the wholly unscientific idea that the UN now believes that it controls "the science" and can demand that no "other science" should be accessible.
In other words, group-think officially guaranteed.
If this isn't the pinnacle of absurdity and arrogance I don't know what is.
The implication is that only UN-affiliated "scientists" trained and paid by UN-affiliated institutions can be allowed to voice their UN-approved opinions in the media.
Censorship? Good Lord no, the "other science" will still be there, it's just that nobody with a normal life to lead will ever find it, since it won't appear in any of the usual places.
Still, this isn't new, it's merely publicly admitted. It has been going on for much longer than most of us realise.
I'm not sure that I hold out much hope for Dr Malone's suggested solution though - we might need a more substantive suggestion before this nonsense is properly terminated.
