2021-11-26
It is now nearly one year since the Covid vaccines started to be rolled out across the world, and it is striking how many reports critical of the vaccines have been published, and how few reports analysing the ins and outs of the admitted adverse events have so far been published by the responsible regulatory agencies to confirm their contention that these jabs are "safe and effective".
In fact the sheer volume of evidence concerning their apparent decline in efficacy and the still unexplained rise in excess deaths that are reportedly occurring despite low death rates attributed to the pandemic, does seem cause to worry that our regulatory agencies may be (at best) asleep on the job - the job of monitoring the outcomes and reporting their findings to the public.
Once more the Daily Sceptic comes to our aid and presents their view of the vaccination drive. Once more the only "official" data source in the UK is the MHRA yellow card reports, and once more the analysis of these figures has been left to independent sources.
" ... (Dr Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: 'The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans' ... )"
The DS seem to have missed the report that Japan may now be moving away from reliance on vaccines to encouraging the use of Ivermectin protocols - it's not exactly a mainstream report but nevertheless a quick search brought up "fact-checkers" debunking the notion, so perhaps it has merit(!)
Of course, if alternative treatments exist then the legal basis for the vaccination programme may be in jeopardy and the ramifications explosive, so this notion is of immense importance, one way or the other. Keep your eyes peeled.
