2023-09-06
We have waited a long time for someone to connect the dots.
Remember, it is the responsibility of the MHRA to monitor the results of the distribution of medicines - including those labelled as vaccines - to pick up any safety signals and ensure that potential problems are investigated.
The ONS has published statistics on excess deaths that can be correlated with the different rates of vaccine uptake across the age ranges.
So, the analysis is based upon the principle that if there is no connection between vaccine uptake and excess deaths, then the excess deaths would not obviously be related to the vaccinated/unvaccinated status of those who died, and the percentage of excess deaths in both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated groups will be (more or less) expected to be the same as the overall proportion for these groups combined.
So if the proportion of excess deaths overall is 10%, then both the unvaccinated and vaccinated classes taken separately will also both be 10%. Vaccination will be inconsequential.
If however 15% of the unvaccinated succumbed to excess deaths and only 5% of the vaccinated succumbed (assuming an equal spit between vaccinated and unvaccinated classes to keep the maths simple!) then we might suspect a link between vaccination and excess deaths (correlation does not prove causation but does indicate the possibility).
Such a result (lower rate of death in the vaccinated) would be consistent with the notion that the vaccines had prevented deaths, whereas a higher rate of deaths in the vaccinated would be a safety signal consistent with the idea that vaccination may be the cause of some of these deaths, and the MHRA would be bound to investigate.
Over to Covid19 Saving the Next Generation.
Meanwhile, this from the British Medical Journal re Covid / flu vaccines:
"The level of threat from this new variant, its transmissibility and pathogenicity, and indeed how effective the vaccines we already have will be, are all unknowns"
So what is the basis upon which these treatments are being offered? Does it constitute "informed consent"?
"Since the Office for National Statistics’ covid surveillance programme was abandoned back in March this year, it’s difficult to know what variants are out there and how quickly they’re spreading"
Clearly, in the face of so many unknowns, your best response is - just say "NO".
But the BMJ, for reasons unstated, has other ideas:
"Clearly, it would be sensible to get the “best guess” vaccine into as many arms as possible, beginning with the most vulnerable patients. GPs will do our best, but don’t be surprised if we’re a bit short tempered about it. The repeated changes to dates and payments make it clear that our colleagues at NHS England have little idea of the logistical challenges involved in providing these clinics."
Over to you when your doctor's receptionist calls.
For my part, I told mine that wild horses wouldn't get me in there - but sadly they said they were fresh out of wild horses so couldn't oblige.
