2022-09-10
The Daily Sceptic once again pulls up a "scientific" paper that should never have passed peer review.
This is a recent paper from a team at the Nuffield Department of Medicine in Oxford Radcliffe hospital, concerning the incidence of myocarditis (the now undisputed side-effect of the Covid / Covid injections). No doubt this establishment gets its funding from the NHS-big-pharma-academia-charitable-foundation blob, so can we expect bias?
Once again we find our old friend the unwarranted assumption rearing its phantom form to provide cover for a better result than may be true. Note that this doesn't render the result they obtained false - but it does drive a coach and horses through the idea that the results obtained are proven true.
So their results may be true or may not. Which is pretty much where they started from.
"The reality is that we had a set of under-tested vaccines that were unleashed onto many multiple millions of individuals without any attempts to undertake large prospective matched cohort trials, even though such trials are normal on the release of a new medical product"
" ... we’re now in the era of ‘big data’ where such studies could readily have been integrated with real-time GP and hospital data to get a good and timely understanding of risks as they emerged ... But, then again, if you don’t look you won’t find"
Read the article, make up your own mind.
