Legal Legal Repeal

2025-07-02

"I just wanted to share with readers how I am using AI for... a parallel FoI request for the slightly different ghost court name used at an earlier point in the prosecution"

If the "Court" which has summoned you has no legal standing, then its activities are unconstitutional and invalid, of no legal effect.

Is the whole system of UK justice actually fake? Without authority? Bogus?

He dubs his proposal "Legal antimatter for constitutional repair" utilising

"From £100 fine to £250,000 problem: the 'Absolute Zero Protocol'"

...

2025-06-29

There is a movement to recognise and ban mRNA injections as bioweapons.

You might think that banning a bioweapon isn't contentious - and you might be right, so the real question boils down to something like "is the mRNA type of injection a bioweapon"?

But what is an "mRNA" injection? We might know what the pharmaceutical companies say is in these injections, but there are plenty of suggestions that these companies are not truthful.

It seems to me that the real problem is not whether or not they should be classified as bioweapons, but whether or not they are "harmful", and that in itself now appears to be a question that can indeed be endlessly debated, despite (or maybe because of) the existence of very expensive "independent" regulators who many believe have conflicts of interest (seen and/or unseen) with those that they purport to

2025-06-28

Listen very carefully...

(7 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-27

Martin Geddes in his latest Substack addresses his (and our) legal difficulties, and how they might be addressed.

From within, or from without.

What to do when the Police, CPS and Judiciary are all shown to be merely an unconstitutional Kabuki Theatre?

There are several approaches...

The "Carlisle Doctrine": expose, don't escape

But if the whole panoply of justice is no more than a complex and deceitful performative art form with no lawful basis, then who can take it on? Even Parliament would struggle to exert any

2025-06-21

Parliament to the rescue?

"A rarely used tool in the legal toolkit could force unconstitutional acts into the open"

So says Martin Geddes, who has asked his AI to unearth the legal routes by which possible illegal or unconstitutional court cases may be challenged.

Only for use when the legality of the proceedings is disputed.

2025-06-21

"Robin Hood" asserts that all Courts in the UK have been fraudulent ever since at least the 1990s and quite possibly earlier.

When our erstwhile monarchy signed us away into the EU, it thereby lost all the authority previously enjoyed, by failing to defend us against the imposition of rule by foreigners not bound by our ancient constitution.

Some might consider that "treason". 

But he asserts that Courts are anyway no longer "Crown Courts" ever since the Crown Officers were removed.

What we have now are Corporate Courts whose only authority is to mediate differences between Corporate entities under the Law of the Sea. As individual subjects of the monarchy living on the land, we don't come under the Corporate Law of the Sea.

So they bamboozle us with

2025-06-20

John O'Looney is a funeral director from Milton Keynes, who was outspoken during the "Covid emergency" for his work in identifying novel "fibrous clots" in the bodies of the deceased that came his way.

Now he highlights some unexpected changes in the way that police handle sudden unexpected deaths, apparently (according to his local Coroner) as a result of new advice from the government about the requirements when dealing with those who have died suddenly. 

John is not impressed. See what you think:

(20 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video

2025-06-19

In past times the law was essentially Common Law, codified by judges on the simple basis that life, health, and property (roughly in that order) were to be defended, that all were equal before the law, and that justice had to be seen to be done.

This was supplemented by agreements between government and the governed, including Magna Carta's various incarnations, and the Glorious Revolution of 1688 (and its Bill of Rights 1689).

David Starkey explained these admirably here.

We have now reached the stage where MPs, displaying no obvious interest in these protections, claim to legislate for women to kill their own babies for good

2025-06-18

Our legal system is a quagmire that few care to argue with because fundamentally, the fraud is so complex that it's impossible for most to navigate through such a maze of treachery, fraud and deception.

I stand in awe of those who challenge the system.

But does it have one or two points of weakness that if exploited can bring the whole house of cards down?

And what does Roman Law have to do with all this?

"We know that you are corrupt from head to toe"

(41 minutes)

Like / dislike this video

2025-06-16

In what is widely seen as welcome U-Turn, there is to be a much-demanded national enquiry into grooming gangs.

Could there possibly be a better way of taking the heat off the government on this topic?

And given the extraordinary success of the UK Covid Enquiry in ignoring all the uncomfortable questions and sweeping the whole operation into the long grass of life-threatening tedium, who better to lead this new exercise in self-exculpation than Baroness Hallett?

The Daily Sceptic reports.

2025-06-14

"In this case I have no care whatsoever whether my driving penalty points and fine are overturned; it has zero importance to me. What matters is that insiders within the system become aware of the abuse they have become enmeshed in, and the risks is poses to them personally"

The indefatigable Martin Geddes (assisted by his AI) writes yet another dissertation about the justice system as it operates in this country, this time addressed to those who work within its confines.

You know who you are!

(see also The Trial from Appleby Horse Fair for background information)

(for those unfamiliar with Q - ...

2025-06-12

Well, the trial of Martin Geddes at "North and West Cumbria Magistrates’ Court (1752)"is over.

Read his report.

A legal phantom creates real liabilities

2025-06-11

Neil McCoy-Ward delivers this in an admirably restrained manner despite the utterly unacceptable government overreach that he is announcing.

Do not adjust your device, but feel free to adjust your MP in an appropriately civilised and parliamentary manner.

(32 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

2025-06-10

In pursuing his claim against the UK justice system, Martin Geddes has documented the case(exhaustively!) and submitted it to the High Court in London as a request for Judicial Review.

The High Court is not amused.

Martin's AI is not amused.

Support him tomorrow at "Carlisle Magistrates Court".

2025-06-09

Fresh from Tennessee he will be at "Carlisle Magistrates Court" 9:30am Wednesday.

He is asserting his right to be tried in a real Court of Law - and not as he alleges in a fake Court which has neither legal authority nor even existence. This is as surreal as unreal gets.

The story so far.

"They are running unauthorised courts in broad daylight and hoping nobody notices"

The Wednesday event.

2025-06-05

Continuing on from his impromptu crowd-fund...

Martin shares another update from the Family Court Case in North Carolina / Tennessee.

2025-05-31

This must be one of the best documented legal cases ever - and all over a parking problem!

The Challenge to the Judicial Reality - Do you exist? By what right do you charge me? 

How can we even ask the question? (You just have to be Martin Geddes)

The Story So Far

Almost within Striking Distance (from half-way around the world)

2025-06-03

What is

2025-05-28

Yes, it's Martin Geddes again, rehearsing his case for Judicial Review at the High Court.

We have featured it before and may do so again, as he does it not for himself, but for all of us. He's probably the only man in the UK with the knowledge, the dedication, and the motivation to attempt such a feat. 

If the High Court slaps him down, we will have proof that justice is no longer obtainable in the UK.

Would that be grounds for revolution?  

2025-05-27

Taxes unlawful?

Whatever happened to "nothing is certain except death and taxes"?

Still, if the Bernician is correct (and that's where I would put my money), the Brexit-in-name-only crew in our "mother of parliaments" have perpetrated a massive screw-up which might bankrupt the government. Furthermore...

"... EVERY new tax created by the UK government and every increase in the percentage of income / capital taxed that wasn’t enabled by primary legislation or prerogative power before 1972 is a nullity at law, in the absence it being EU-derived legislation"

"Fiat justitia ruat caelum" could be

2025-05-24

If you're on a roll, keep rollin'.

Martin Geddes is scrambling to push his application for Judicial Review to the High Court as Litigant in Person on time, whilst simultaneously involved in a complex legal case in the US.

It's the UK case that prompts his update this week.

If the SAS ever need a legal beagle, then I suggest he is attempting the legal equivalent of the SAS entry course, with consequences that no man may foresee... but happily, he has A I to back him up and do much of the detailed heavy lifting required.

Onward and upward!