Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

The Jury is Out!

Details
Category: Legal
Hits: 187

2025-11-26

The administrative government, seemingly oblivious to the constitutional need for our citizens to be judged by a "jury of our peers", now proposes, in order to cut the administrative backlog now denying justice to criminals and victims alike, to abolish the right to a jury for "non-serious" offences.

Magna Carta? What's that? How old-fashioned! We need to be modern, and grasp the benefits that modernity offers! Who would not want justice delivered promptly and without fear? Ancient and outdated tradition must not be permitted to stand in the way of progress!

This is how the ignorant and the mendacious want to convince us to abandon what remains of our Constitution so that they may better rule the people by decree. No matter that it is the people themselves who were sovereign, have always been sovereign, still are sovereign, and will always be sovereign unless and until they give up their sovereignty for the "mess of pottage" loosely but misleadingly known as "Progressivism" (AKA modern Parliamentarianism). And yes, we are well down that road today already ...

And yes, indeed we do need "progress", but toward what end? Is it to be toward the sovereignty of the people over their government, or toward the sovereignty of those self-righteous scoundrels miscreants (AKA politicians) and technocrats who would set themselves up to rule over the people for their own ends? 

Will Jones reports.

 

Down the Rabbit Hole - to the Origins of Christianity?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 307

2025-11-25

This is dangerous territory, so before plunging in, if you have not already, please read Down the Rabbit Hole 1 wherein I attempt to justify taking a critical look at topics which many will find controversial.

Here someone else takes a look at early Christianity (upon which topic the brainwashing has had at least two millennia to get going). He's obviously done a lot more work on this than I have, so I'm very happy to concede the leadership on this one.

But first, to get ourselves into the mood ...

Do we believe that the Bible as we know it today is the uncorrupted Word of God?

Do we think we know the origins of the Church of England?

Or the foundation of Christianity in Rome after the martyrdom of St Peter?

What is the true meaning of the Holy Spirit?

How did we go from there to the burning of heretics at the stake (even for merely translating the Bible into English!), and the notorious genocide of the Cathars? 

If you ask me, these acts alone (and I don't doubt there are many more) indelibly mark the Vatican as the incarnation of Satan on Earth. Or at least the Antichrist. 

But what about our good old C of E?

Read very carefully - it's dark in here! You decide, if you dare.

Exercise for our readers: 
Consider whether the Cathars were similar to the pre-Roman civilisation in the British Isles, and in what ways they are known to have differed?

Note:

To access the Bernician's website, copy this URL ( https://www.thebernician.net/ ) into your browser and carefully negotiate the Captcha procedure to validate your humanity. Good Luck!

 

Habeus Courtus - Legal Necessity or Typo?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 152

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

Maybe this idea should be further explored ...

View From The Melt Down - Fulford Report 24 Nov 2025

Details
Category: Greater Reset!
Hits: 258

2025-11-24

I seems that the White Hats are circling their prey, and the Black hats are circling their wagons to try to stave off the inevitable.

Israel and Ukraine are key - one is apparently intent on genociding Gaza, and the other is intent on genocide in the Ukraine at the hands of the Russians. Meanwhile the Zelensky leadership seems close to being fingered in an alleged corruption scandal involving the disposition of the "support" that has been flowing into the country from the EU and elsewhere.

There is more of course, but it's behind the paywall for this week.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

 

More Opprobrium Heaped upon the Hapless Hallett

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 132

2025-11-24

And deservedly so.

No, it was not an "in depth" inquiry, which would have asked the deep questions such as "Why were Prof Ferguson's Covid expected deaths modelling so vastly inflated"? 

Was the supposition that the PCR tests worked infallibly true - to what extent was it not true? All tests produce "false positives" and "false negatives" - was this novel test for a novel virus actually accurate - or was the testing of the (largely asymptomatic) general population actually a good exercise to determine the real rate of "false positives"?

If a mere IT retiree such as myself could think to ask such simple but revealing questions, what does that say about the good Baroness Hallett?

Yes, the UK Covid Inquiry was garbage, fatally flawed by its unquestioning acceptance of falsehoods that were already publicly questioned back in the early days before the quaxxines came out.

Brownstone Institute makes the same point more formally.

Even so, more fundamental questions still should have been asked:

  1. What proof (as opposed to circumstantial evidence) existed that the Covid19 "disease" was actually caused by a virus, as opposed to, for example, the effects of radiation whose symptoms were broadly identical?

  2. What proof existed that the Covid "virus" was indeed contagious via respiratory infection?

They were not.

 

Page 68 of 385