Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

This is Not Party Politics

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 523

2025-09-09

No, really. Liz Truss proved that it can happen to any party that's in office but not in power.

And that observation really sums up the state of play in politics all around the world - nothing is as it seems.

It is however illustrative of the folly of central banking. Not enough money from taxes for the government? So borrow more fake money (newly invented with a few keystrokes) from the Central Bank and repay the loan with interest (from genuine money from the product of the taxes on your labours). Central bankers like this because they make a killing.

Still in trouble? So borrow more fake money (newly invented with a few keystrokes) from a Global Bank like the IMF and repay the loan with interest (from genuine money from the product of your labours, via our obliging government's taxes). Global bankers like it because they make a killing.

Did you spot the problem yet?

Every "solution" involves syphoning real money out of the productive economy, either through real money taxes for the government to waste on vanity projects (or worse), or real money loan repayments for the bankers' loans of fake money, so depriving the productive economy of real money that could have been invested for future production. So the economy fails to recover because it cannot expand (or soon enough even maintain) rates of production, while the super-rich fly around from casino to casino in private jets ...

This is the so-called but by now wearyingly familiar "productivity crisis" which is always blamed on businesses' bad management.

Result? Doom loop where every "corrective action" results in a worsening of the situation. As night follows day.
(NB: This is not this financial advice - I cannot exclude their "hot tips" but you follow them up at your own peril!)

"Nobody ever ponders whether the economy is stagnant because of the government’s plans to reinvigorate it. Reagan said it best: 'A big businessman is what a small businessman would be if only the government would get out of the way and leave him alone.' " - Discuss.

Possible solutions:

  • Tax less and reduce government spending so that it can live within its means, and the economy can actually invest for growth.
  • Abolish Central Banks. Make the lending of fake money a criminal offence (it is actually deceit pure and simple).
  • Abolish the government - this is the extreme version of item 1 above, but could we not live pretty happily without their incessant legislating regulating and general "do-gooding" interference in our lives?
  • All of the above ... in phased stages so as to minimise disruption caused by returning government employees to the productive economy. The longer this is delayed, the harder it gets ...

  • or maybe a "Great Reset" where we really will "own nothing and be happy" because all purchasing power will finally have been diverted to the criminals in charge and we serfs will get a monthly pittance that we can spend only as permitted by the CBDC - provided our monitored behaviour is acceptable to the bankers of course.

  • and lastly, the unmentionable "Grand Fenwick" manoeuver (included only for the sake of completeness!).

    Get conquered by Russia, which has demonstrated its ability to remove parasites from its own government, has allowed its economy to prosper (despite sanctions), is now well on the way to performing a similar cleanse of the Ukraine, and on current projections will likely have to do much the same with the rest of Europe in due course. This may however be regarded as a "High Risk" strategy ... and Russia herself may understandably decline our entreaties ...

    Oh Wait! Perhaps this is actually policy ...

And finally, please don't "shoot the messenger" - there will be plenty of other culprits to pick on come the revolution.

 

Strategic Sequencing Rules

Details
Category: Defence
Hits: 489

2025-09-09

So who is really in charge in the US of A?

Is the US President a fake like all the others around the globe?

Should we be thinking bigger than ever before about the extent of the fakery that has infested global politics (not to mention academia, NGOs, charitable foundations, and global governance under the United Nations - WEF "partnership")?

I don't know, but it's the logical inference to be drawn if Brian Berletic is correct in his analysis of who is really in control in the (western parts of) the Ukraine ...

"This demonstrates continuity of agenda. It does not matter who Americans vote for, who is in the White House, who controls Congress; this is a singular agenda that continues no matter what ..."

"The special interests driving this are unelected, monolithic, there ... is no-one else in the US capable of challenging or displacing them ... "

(46 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Trump Trumped by Imposter? - Fulford Report 8 Sep 2025

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 167

2025-09-08

In an outspoken report, Ben asserts that a fake Trump manipulated by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is now appearing in news reports and "White House dinners" with the rich and suspect.

So where is the real Trump? - always assuming that such a personage actually existed ...

If it seems that nothing that we have seen in the media may be true, so that would indeed include the Donald.

And to be consistent we must lump in Ben Fulford for good measure - after all, his contacts at the secret services / secret societies will tell him exactly what they want him to tell us ...

Where does that leave us? With Socratic Wisdom, questioning everything, assuming nothing, and having to fall back on our own perceptions, however ill-informed we may be.

Modest subscription required for full access.

 

If the Judicial System is Broken, What Kind of System Do We Want?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 486

2025-09-08

Martin Geddes writes in from his "holiday" ...

"Not everyone agrees on what a better world should look like, only that the one we have is unsatisfactory"

"How language is twisted so that we trick ourselves into surrendering what is already ours"

If we want a new system, it must be founded upon a common language with the common word meanings so that all participants stand on the same common ground for communication. OK, Geordie isn't the same as Scouse, but all Englishmen should be "King's English" capable, otherwise the Courts become unusable for all except the legal profession.

But I digress.

What else is missing?

The complexity of today's legal systems may not be readily disentangled from the political systems. The latter doesn't so much require reform as take-down and reinvention - so may the legal system.

But to dismantle everything without putting something reasonably familiar in its place may be to court both chaos and anarchy, so probably best to revert everything to a time when the English (Not to Mention Scottish Irish and Welsh) Constitutions, Parliaments, and Legal systems were unsullied by the Act of Union of 1707.

That might form a viable and just starting point (free of the EU and globalist nonsense) for further reform, whilst not relinquishing all current familiarity with our systems of governance, but reverting to the foundation of the presently much-derided English Constitution and according the four nations their own independent systems.

It will be a leisurely journey, rather than a day trip.

Yes that's overly simplistic, but we have to start somewhere.

We will need a plan, and perhaps some doughty people have already given the matter some serious thought.

 

Trump the Inconsistent

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 476

2025-09-08

"It is important to recognize that the mixed messaging exists because you are being lied to and once in a while you are fed a degree of truth to cling to while the technocratic slave system moves forward"

Quite so. Whilst most of us have better things to do than scan all of Trump's pronouncements for inconsistent messaging, some inconsistencies are too large to pass unnoticed!

So it is with "vaccines at warp speed".  Almost everybody knows that "vaccines are inherently dangerous" ever since Ronald Reagan elicited that response when he asked why Big Pharma couldn't make their vaccines safer. Since then they have been given legal protection from claims for damages due to "side effects", pitting individual claimants against the bottomless pockets of governments motivated to deny redress from their "compensation schemes".

That alone should tell us that government does not work for us!

So what incentives did Big Pharma have to ensure the safety and efficacy of the "warp speed" products, products which should normally undergo years of trials to ensure that the "side effects" were not too numerous to provoke the populace to say "enough is enough"?

And so to today's non-sequitur.

 

Page 52 of 337