2026-06-06
A number of researchers (prominent amongst them being Dr Mike Yeadon) are claiming that virology is the study of something that doesn't exist - the virus particle is so tiny it's invisible without special equipment, and the techniques used to "isolate" a virus are not proven to do any such thing.
So it could well all be make-believe. A vast pyramid of pseudo-science constructed on a foundation of nothing more substantial than a carefully crafted narrative.
Preposterous? Certainly.
Impossible? Certainly not - there are plenty of examples of propagating false narratives for the purposes of deceiving populations, especially during war-time. Usually by governments who can control the media from which the population gets its information.
There's already a word for it: "propaganda".
Why would they lie about it?
Well there are some obvious possible factors, high amongst them being the possibility to medicate a vast variety of symptoms that are claimed to be the work of a vast variety of viruses that will each require their very own vaccine to be developed tested and injected at truly astronomical expense into the entire population whether healthy or not - all paid for by our benevolent governments so we have no excuse to refuse them, even though we still have to pay for them in taxation ...
Sure beats the hell out of any other business proposition, especially given their immunity from prosecution for those unfortunate but "rare" adverse events.
Whilst all the above is extremely plausible (and given the vast profits involved, perhaps as close to "beyond reasonable doubt" as we may ever get), is it really the whole story?
