Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser
Featured
Something We Were Not Told About the Pandemic?
- Details
- Category: Covid
- Hits: 1842
2022-11-04
Including who was in charge of the pandemic response, apparently.
Of course the lead was taken by America, but evidence has been uncovered that the Anthony Fauci - Deborah Birx duality was not in charge.
It seems that the legal situation was changed, effectively by presidential fiat:
"An astonishing Government document dated March 13th 2020 ... reveals that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies ... but rather by the National Security Council"
"The NSC does not include as regular attendees any representatives from public health related agencies"
" ... on March 18th 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – which comprises the CDC, NIAID, NIH and other ... agencies – had no official leadership role in pandemic response"
"On March 13th 2020, President Donald J. Trump declared a nationwide emergency under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act ... authorising assistance administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Five days later, the President notified then-FEMA Administrator Peter Gaynor that the agency would assume leadership of the federal pandemic response effort"
OK, so we have an unprecedented (in recent times) pandemic emergency, apparently originating from China, which required resolute, precise and effective action, and the first step was to give control of the federal response to a security agency that had no medical experience to speak of ... what could possibly go wrong?
This is a bit of a deep dive onto the legal labyrinth (as far as so far possible) but the implications for the practical management of the policies measures and staff required to counter the incoming threat can't be understated - the whole raft of established pandemic preparedness planning was turned upside down at precisely the time that it was actually needed.
But there's more ...
"I believe that the national security authorities took control of the Covid pandemic response not just in the U.S. but in many of our allied countries (the U.K., Australia, Germany, Israel and others) because they knew SARS-CoV-2 was an engineered virus that leaked from a lab researching potential bioweapons"
(It seems that the UK was a bit slower off the mark in the reorganisation race, not completing the transition from Public Health England to the UKHSA until April 2021. It still reports to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, although I note that it coexists cheek by jowl with an adjacent military establishment of some repute at Porton Down)
The Daily Sceptic brings an entirely new perspective to our understanding of how the pandemic response was handled, and this is essential reading for those of us who wish to inform ourselves (as well as we may) on this historic event.
Dr Mike Yeadon Tells It as He Sees It
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 2014
2022-11-01
The now famous (or infamous if you prefer) Dr Yeadon has extended his study to include global politics, especially those politics as promulgated by the UN.
What has this got to do with medicine? What has medicine got to do with politics?
Well, he applies the same analytical research and thinking that led him to a successful medical career to the field of global politics, in particular the politics of the United Nations.
And yes, his starting-point is the Covid-19 "pandemic" and all its works.
If you ask me (oh, go on!) he has excelled himself in this exposition for Halloween on CHD.TV yesterday - a must-watch.
Do also check out the links to Hedley Rees, whom Mike mentions at the start of his video.
Why Do We Need an Institute for Responsible Technology?
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 1244
2022-10-30
Well, if the wholesale roll-out of experimental largely untested pharmaceutical gene-editing products across all (healthy!) populations and age-groups regardless of risk isn't enough to convince you, how about the uncontrolled roll-out of untested unregulated and unlabelled gene-edited flora and fauna (including food) all across the world for all manner of profitable purposes?
"Gene editing is cheap, easy, prone to side effects, poorly regulated and can permanently alter nature’s gene pool - a recipe for disaster"
This annoying video with its irritating tinkly muzak sets out the technical risks well enough, but the primary issues that concern me are:
a) Our freedom of choice to accept or reject such foods and products will be quickly (or immediately if labelling is not deemed necessary) reduced to virtually zero. You can eat anything you like but there will no longer be any original natural foods available.
b) The Big-Pharma-Crony-Government axis has conclusively demonstrated that we have absolutely no reason to trust any product of Big-Corporate-Crony-Government.
c) Regulation in the public interest is not the answer where Big-Money can and does buy any regulator. If we are arguing for better regulation then we are on the wrong horse. We should simply make it illegal, break up the corporations who are pushing it, and bury the technology for good (yes, that's easier said than done, but where's our ambition?).
Still interested? Watch the video, read the article (recommended).
EU Parliamentarians Eviscerate the Official Lies
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 1317
2022-10-21
Christine Anderson (Germany), Francesca Donata (Italy), Ivan Vilibor Sinčić (Croatia), Stasys Jakeliūnas (Lithuania), Cristian Terhes (Romania) lay out the lies for us in all their pathetic detail.
Wonderful to see that there are MEPs still determined to tell the truth despite all official obfuscation denial and discouragement.
Their presentation of the truth regardless of whom they may upset is outstanding. True and fearless democrats all.
(40 minutes)
Good Morning CHD - Episode 156 with John O'Looney
- Details
- Category: Free Citizen
- Hits: 1462
2022-10-15
We have featured John O'Looney before, but his testimony is clear, succinct, and as compete a story as we are likely to get on the damages that he attributes to the quaxxines.
He has seen it all, and he tells it all. He's quite extraordinary, and very lucid.
(64 minutes)
"They are hiding it, they are complicit in it ... and they are still trying to ... cajole, coerce and frighten ... people into getting more poison"
"They want to sterilise them ... "
And finally, his take on the current 'energy crisis' ...
"The idea is to make the cost of living so expensive that you're reliant on the State, and the only way that you can get those finances from the State is to be vaccinated and to have your digital passport, and be part of the digital financial system they're about to set up ... "
Good Morning CHD - Episode 156 with John O'Looney
Page 305 of 337
