Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

View from Scott Ritter

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 966

2024-07-06

The situation in Israel, and the symbiotic relationship with the American "inner agency" - AKA the Deep State - and how might "the Donald" make a difference?

(24 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

The View from Moscow

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 984

2024-07-06

Pepe Escobar reviews the recent years' events, and Russia's reaction to them.

(22 minutes)

 

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Aaron Siri Testifies in New Hampshire on Covid Response Efficacy

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 918

2024-07-05

Lawyer Aaron Siri testifies before the New Hampshire House Committee on COVID Response Efficacy.

Part 1:

(87 minutes)

Part 2:

(75 minutes)

 

 

Meet the New Boss - Same as the Old Boss?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 926

2024-07-05

With a new Prime Minister and a new Parliament (inclusive - finally! - of Nigel Farage), what does the future hold for the UK?

And how is the Net Zero programme relevant? And immigration?

Nick Hubble reviews our prospects from a safe distance in Japan:

(28 minutes)

Like / Dislike this video here.

 

Covid "Vaccines" Trials in Context

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 1264

2024-07-02

" ... my written testimony submitted to Congress explaining why it was sheer folly to think that the Covid-19 vaccines were going to be properly safety tested before or after licensure"

Many acres of internet pages have by now been written by many and various authors devoted to all manner of theories about how the Covid jabs were developed, approved, marketed and distributed. This is but the latest in a long line, but it takes as its baseline the traditional notion that the usual regulatory bodies, that normally regulate vaccines and pharmaceutical products, were similarly responsible for the Covid products (other authors may disagree).

Even so, it is still damning.

In fact, it seems to be a dreadful litany of failure to protect the public at every conceivable level.

Of course, this is all perfectly understandable if we assume that the regulatory authorities involved are simply irredeemably incompetent, or merely having a great many bad days.

It is also perfectly understandable if we assume that they are actually working for the pharmaceutical companies (or other agencies) against the interests of the public.

One of the functions of the courts is surely to determine which of these scenarios applies, but perhaps the public would be wise to come to their own self-defence by taking appropriate measures to avoid such products if they feel that they may be unsafe for any reason.

 

Page 247 of 382