2023-08-28
Regular readers will know that this site is highly dubious about the claims of a coronavirus rampant causing a recent pandemic. This doubt is fuelled by the obviously inadequate nature of the "test" by which the "infection" was "confirmed". The fact that "the science" never condescended to even consider this evidence indicated that this was an argument they would not willingly address, and we must assume that in all likelihood this was because they knew it was an argument that they could not win.
This line of thought alone is sufficient to debunk the reality of the pandemic - especially as (prior to vaccinations being applied) the overall death rate remained largely within normal bounds - some pandemic!
Does this thinking also disprove the whole science of virology? No. It just proves that the supposed SARS-CoV2 virus (if it existed) was not causing a pandemic.
But if "they" would lie to us about the pandemic, we really should ask "what would they not lie about"?
So is virology itself (as we understand it) just another lie?
And how can we be sure?
It's your viewpoint that counts.
(1 hr 56 mins)
