2023-06-05
... down the Publication Hole?
We are admonished to "follow the science" repeatedly, especially in recent times when apparently political decisions (lockdowns et al) were more or less nakedly dressed up as "science" despite "the science" that was widely recognised only months previously being entirely different ...
How did that happen?
Net Zero Watch (no, this actually isn't about climate-you-know-what) brings us an amusing (depending upon your sense of humour) but instructive ("follow the science!") and "important" (probably depending upon your paymasters) paper by W.M. Briggs that describes (yet another) "scientific" investigation into (wait for it ... ) the reliability or otherwise of the "published science".
Surely a topic that is well overdue investigation?
But does it fulfil it's own criteria?
It may be too early to tell ... but it sure is worth a read!
