Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

10/31/2022

In a seriously well-argued presentation to a Cambridge Union debate, Laura Dodsworth blesses us by filing her transcript on Substack.

Yes, primarily she has the Covid-type experts in her cross-hairs but the psychology experts in the infamous (and if it's not infamous yet then it should be) nudge unit come in hard on their heels (to mix my metaphors).

It's a polite but uncompromising indictment of government by "experts", but it's also a criticism of the many who, despite all the signals that conflicted with seemingly everything we should have known, still meekly, even gladly, did as we were told.

A tour de force.

If I have a criticism (yes I do) it is that she too ignores the possibility that the Covid exercise wasn't merely an innocent overreach by deluded experts safe in their own bubble, but may have been a criminal conspiracy by an unelected global mafia, driven by the lust for money and/or power.

The fact that the majority of world governments (what's the collective noun for governments? Oh yes, the United Nations) in startling synchronisation and with pitifully few honourable exceptions suddenly turned all previously accepted epidemiology and statistical good practice upside down, should have been enough to alert us that something was seriously amiss. It alerted me anyway.

That this could have happened by chance seems remarkably unlikely, but let's randomly assume that the probability of this happening by chance is 10% - high enough to be within the bounds of possibility (and almost certainly much higher than the true probability, given the number of governments and "independent" scientific and media agencies involved).

It is also pretty unlikely that certain healthy African presidents who had the temerity to refuse to fall into line should have just happened to die soon afterwards in mysterious circumstances. Let's say that the chance of this too happening quite at random is (an also improbably high) 10%.

Put only these two facts together and the chances of it all just happening at random becomes 10% of 10% = 1%.

This on its own is more than enough for us to rule the "global conspiracy" theory into consideration, meaning that no serious discourse on what happened should exclude it.