Tip - If you are using a phone, set the "Desktop Site" option in your browser   

Featured

Habeus Courtus - Legal Necessity or Typo?

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 64

2025-11-25

Yes, Martin Geddes has been up to his illuminations of matters legal and lawful, in terms that I would wager most of us could comprehend.

If we were asked to attend court and found ourselves "had up" before the head teacher in the local secondary school, we might begin to question the genuineness not only of the proceedings but also of those conducting the proceedings.

"When is a 'Court' not a Court?" would be a relevant question, and the Head Teacher should have some explaining to do.

Still, if instead we had attended in a building labelled as a "Court" and been confronted by somebody professing to be a magistrate, would anybody dare to question the legitimacy of the situation? Yet the overwhelming likelihood of just accepting the given as legitimate surely is an open invitation for fraudsters to take advantage? Even unwitting fraudsters who themselves had not validated their higher authority?

Maybe this idea should be further explored ...

View From The Melt Down - Fulford Report 24 Nov 2025

Details
Category: Greater Reset!
Hits: 127

2025-11-24

I seems that the White Hats are circling their prey, and the Black hats are circling their wagons to try to stave off the inevitable.

Israel and Ukraine are key - one is apparently intent on genociding Gaza, and the other is intent on genocide in the Ukraine at the hands of the Russians. Meanwhile the Zelensky leadership seems close to being fingered in an alleged corruption scandal involving the disposition of the "support" that has been flowing into the country from the EU and elsewhere.

There is more of course, but it's behind the paywall for this week.

(Modest subscription required for full access)

 

More Opprobrium Heaped upon the Hapless Hallett

Details
Category: Free Citizen
Hits: 53

2025-11-24

And deservedly so.

No, it was not an "in depth" inquiry, which would have asked the deep questions such as "Why were Prof Ferguson's Covid expected deaths modelling so vastly inflated"? 

Was the supposition that the PCR tests worked infallibly true - to what extent was it not true? All tests produce "false positives" and "false negatives" - was this novel test for a novel virus actually accurate - or was the testing of the (largely asymptomatic) general population actually a good exercise to determine the real rate of "false positives"?

If a mere IT retiree such as myself could think to ask such simple but revealing questions, what does that say about the good Baroness Hallett?

Yes, the UK Covid Inquiry was garbage, fatally flawed by its unquestioning acceptance of falsehoods that were already publicly questioned back in the early days before the quaxxines came out.

Brownstone Institute makes the same point more formally.

Even so, more fundamental questions still should have been asked:

  1. What proof (as opposed to circumstantial evidence) existed that the Covid19 "disease" was actually caused by a virus, as opposed to, for example, the effects of radiation whose symptoms were broadly identical?

  2. What proof existed that the Covid "virus" was indeed contagious via respiratory infection?

They were not.

 

What Happens When You Win in Court?

Details
Category: Covid
Hits: 126

2025-11-23

Interest of Justice found out in Costa Rica.

They have the win, they now have to sue enough national governments to start a global ball of Nuremberg trials rolling ...

... and that costs dosh.

It sounds a lot, but there's a lot of us, so per capita it won't break the bank.

That's the theory anyway, and so far it's been proven correct.

It's doable, and it's down to us.

And they have the win to prove it.

COP30 Cops Out?

Details
Category: Greater Reset!
Hits: 88

2025-11-22

The UN's Climate Control Event COP30 did not go according to plan.

After all, nothing destroys an illusion like reality, and the reality is that none of the much-foretold climate-warming catastrophes deigned to come true, even as the worst effects of the push for Agenda 2030 become glaringly apparent.

So was it all for nothing?

I don't think so.

It has had / will have the singular effect of destroying the trust that uncritical people have reflexively placed in the UN's authority.

Watch what happens now to the WHO, the WHO-WEF partnership, the UN aid programmes and much else besides.

As a fish rots from the head, the crumbling of fake authority has begun.

This could be Biblical ...

 

Page 20 of 337